When Teens Just…Snuck onto Antarctic Expeditions

>

In 1928, 17-year-old Billy Gawronski decided it wasn’t enough to dream about going to Antarctica, so he set out to secretly join an outgoing ship. In an excerpt from Laurie Gwen Shapiro’s forthcoming book about Gawronski’s adventures, The Stowaway, we find Billy at a crucial moment in his plan.


As he took his first strokes through the murky, reeking Hudson River, Billy feared the whipping winds. He kept count—one, two, three, four, five; six, seven, eight, nine, ten—feeling a growing ease in the choppy water, even if he wasn’t going as fast as he thought. “Keep going,” he told himself; it was less than a mile to the ship. So long ago, on outdoor swims with the Polish Falcons, he had mastered the right way to breathe. Later, a streetwise immigrant’s kid, he’d jumped off the East River pier at a roped-off swimming area called Central Lanes, where even as a nine-year-old, he faced a harsher current than here. Billy was a veteran of hundreds of river swims.

As he told it later, the only thing on his mind was his one shot to get before Commander Richard E. Byrd and appeal to his mercy. Byrd liked stowaways. All the seventeen-year-old could do was aim for the flagship and hope for the best.

As he approached the City of New York, there was enough light to spot a hawser (a thick tow rope) hanging down to the brackish water. Despite numb fatigue, Billy found the strength to pull himself up and then keep his footing on the slippery deck that smelled of salt and masculine adventure. Covered in river scum, hair hanging down his forehead like oily kelp, he found his way to the hold, clambering on hands and knees, inching crabwise over rough-hewn wooden boards, and picking his way past intriguing crates of explorer supplies to find the out-of-view spot he’d settled on during his reconnaissance mission nine days before.

Billy removed his squelchy wet graduation suit, rolled the jacket and pants out of view, and stripped to his underwear. (One contradictory account claimed that he hid nude.) Secreted in the pitch-black of the smaller of the two forecastles he’d selected when the ship was open to visitors, Billy retold himself there had to be a job on the ship for a determined kid like him with water-clogged ears. Did he think of his mother, so fiercely protective of her only child; a woman who would never have thought him capable of betraying her this way? How long could he hold out without food or water? When should he emerge? There was no official rulebook for stowaways.

He had read about the hoopla planned for the send-off in the morning: the brass bands and relatives and bigwigs invited on deck to say goodbye before the New York loosened her moorings and the city’s official welcoming tugboat brought well-wishers back to shore. Rumor had it that Amelia Earhart, the new Queen of the Air, would loop-de-loop over the Hudson, the grand finale to send the ship on its way. Earhart was a great friend of Commander Byrd, and, unbeknownst to the public, the new mistress of his very married publisher. She had promoted the expedition as a personal favor, endorsing Lucky Strike cigarettes (“Lucky Strikes were the cigarettes she carried on the Friendship when she crossed the Atlantic. For a slender figure, reach for a Lucky instead of a sweet”) and publicly handing over her $1,500 earnings to fund the Antarctic trip.

Finally, snatches of sleep until—something creaked. A rat? Scary shadows flickered across the walls. What happened next felt like a hallucination: just a few feet away from him on the dark second forecastle deck, Billy could just see a kid around his age, equally shocked to have company. The puny boy whispered his name: Jack.

Jack was a happy-go-lucky sixteen-year-old Jewish kid who had dropped out of school. Before this caper, Manhattan was the farthest he’d ever traveled from the Brownsville section of Brooklyn, where he’d been born. Jack told his unexpected competitor that he’d arrived at the City of New York at seven o’clock in the morning, an hour before.

Well, determined Billy, then he was here first, hours ago. This was his spot.

Jack tried to discourage Billy, insisting that it wouldn’t pay for him to make this two-year trip without any of the thought he himself had put in. Why, Jack had brought a suitcase stuffed with warm clothes for once they neared Antarctica. He’d come aboard with extra clean underwear and a $100 bill pinned inside a coat pocket. Billy was practically naked. Negative 74.4 degrees? He’d freeze!

Billy was no dupe. “Is that so?” he shot back. If this was going to be such a rotten trip, why didn’t Jack get off the boat?

The boys argued for nearly an hour, cramped in their almost-adjacent shelves on the lower hidden forecastle, first in whispers, and then louder and louder. But then, to their joint amazement, yet another voice piped up: “Keep quiet! They’ll find all of us!”

Could there really be a third stowaway? Yes, the voice told them, for over two days! It was a deeper voice, manlier, belonging to one Bob Lanier, a black youth of twenty. Even knowing where to look, Billy and Jack could see only his feet.

Well, Jack said, that still left him the “sensible” one who had thought this through. Who goes the cracked step of swimming in the Hudson? Nuts! He’d taken a ferry and entered from the Hoboken pier when the crew wasn’t looking, without getting wet or tired out.

Bob said he had hired a rowboat to get to the ship, remaining as dry as Jack. Then he stopped talking, even when Billy and Jack called out to him. He let the younger daredevils bicker over who had the right to be with Byrd.

As the sun broke from behind clouds above deck, thousands of wistful Byrd fans jammed the pier. Nineteen Eagle Scouts were thickly clustered where the expedition publicists had prearranged for them to congratulate the cherry-picked Paul Siple, who, in full view of the cameras, calmly said goodbye to his tearful parents and his twenty-five-year-old sister, Carolyn, and admitted to curious reporters that, no, he didn’t have a girl. One reporter later described Siple as “[t]he fully-accepted Peter Pan, standing on deck as calm as Capablanca.” (Cuban-born José Raúl Capablanca was world chess champion from 1921 to 1927.)

Nearly six foot four and weighing more than two hundred pounds, Siple was hardly a boy in the same way that Billy or Jack was, and his Boy Scouts uniform bulged with telltale manly muscles. But the media kept up the charade, even though the nineteen-year-old had already completed his first year at Allegheny College in Meadville, Pennsylvania, his double majors biology and geology. (Byrd had shrewdly set an age of seventeen to twenty for his scouting recruitment.)

Below deck, the boys agreed, finally, on something: Siple had to be a ringer! He was a member of the Alpha Chi Rho fraternity. He was not a boy like them.

Up above the boys’ heads, Commander Byrd had joined the flagship crew for a minitrip around the Statue of Liberty before his scheduled return to shore. Dressed in khaki trousers and shirt, and topped with a little khaki sunhat appropriate for the wilds of a jungle, Byrd was the very embodiment of what Americans thought an explorer should be.

As commotion increased above, adrenaline spiked below in the hold. The trio was terrified of being discovered before the ship left port. If only they could hear more than muffled voices.

Journalists fired off last questions, with Byrd pooh-poohing rumors that the two thousand gallons of booze, four hundred gallons of rum, one hundred gallons of port wine, one hundred gallons of sherry, one hundred quarts of champagne, and additional rye and burgundy on board were anything but medicinal. What an undignified question! “Just when we are starting,” he told the goading reporter who dared to raise that issue now, “I can hardly afford to discuss things that are not so. I have issued the order that there is to be no intoxicating liquor aboard except for medicinal purposes, and that this alcohol is to be kept under lock and key by the medical officer of the expedition.”

(The explorers of what’s been called the heroic age did not have to suffer the indignity of American prudency: Ernest Shackleton wisely brought along plenty of hard liquor to cheer his men. In 2006, several unopened cases of the malt whisky his boozy crew imbibed in 1909 were found beneath the floorboards of their expedition hut in Antarctica’s Cape Royds. The whisky was smartly cloned by the original distiller, Mackinlay’s, for sale in the twenty-first century as Mackinlay’s Shackleton Rare Old Highland Malt.)

The City of New York left Hoboken’s Pier 1 with two hundred tons of material aboard and thirty-three people (not including three thrill-thirsty stowaways) shortly before one o’clock. Barges had been set up under spitting skies for hundreds of cheering spectators, and there was a band aboard New York City’s official municipal welcoming tug, the Macom (its name an abbreviation of “Mayor’s Committee”), an iconic boat built in 1894 and still in regular use for greeting visiting dignitaries, from foreign leaders to triumphant sports stars. The band’s playlist included “The Star-Spangled Banner,” “Auld Lang Syne,” “Till We Meet Again,” “While,” and “Laugh! Clown! Laugh!”

Fireworks thrilled.

After a final speech, a Junkers monoplane manned by the expedition’s much-lauded pilots dipped and capered across the voyaging ship’s bows and banked at vertiginous angles over her stem, the most forward part of a ship’s bow. (Although some 1928 reporters thought aviatrix sensation Amelia Earhart was also circling overhead in tribute, others got it right: she had merely come aboard for the send-off.) Ships docked at piers and on the river whistled goodbye. Harold Cunningham, the captain of the largest working American ship, the Leviathan, swung his gargantuan liner to pay respect before heading to Rio de Janeiro. Well-heeled passengers in nautical sweaters and vested suits came to the rails, and—seeing the gold-and-blue banner for the “Byrd Antarctica Expedition” on the ship passing by—waved wildly. Next to the Leviathan, the forty-three-year-old square-rigger looked like a bathtub toy.

Up on deck of the New York stood the assigned Times reporter, Russell Owen, already a well-respected veteran of exploration coverage but not yet nearly the household name he would become by expedition’s end. He’d later describe leaning against the railing and taking his first notes as an unofficial crew member while each swash of wave hit. Owen’s dozens of articles over the next two years would earn him a Pulitzer Prize.

Still down below and having missed all the revelries—and panicking a few times at the sound of nearby footsteps—the three hidden youths felt real motion now. Their bona fide adventure began as the City of New York slowly navigated the tricky waters of New York Harbor, heading toward the Atlantic Ocean and a quick first stop in Virginia to top up her coal briquettes before sailing for the Panama Canal.

Shirtless men in overalls scampered on deck, working to square the yards (adjust the sails) before hitting the Atlantic. Below deck a radio was turned on.

Did the boys discuss a plan to emerge? Did they even have one? Byrd would disembark soon, yes—but even if they were found before he left after sailing a few miles with reporters for show, they’d have plenty of opportunity to meet their hero in Dunedin, after all, in two months’ time.

Nerves frayed, sloppy with exhaustion, Billy and Jack were at it again, not even in hiding anymore. Why wouldn’t a young fellow like Billy be thinking of getting a start in the world instead of traveling around? He’d have to work awfully hard if they caught him, and he wouldn’t be paid for it.

Footsteps! Someone above had heard Jack and Billy arguing: that someone being sharp-eyed Sverre Strom, the six-foot-two, two-hundred-pound Norwegian second mate and ice pilot—one of the very few foreigners invited to join the Americans. Everyone wanted Norwegians. Strom had been hired as a veteran of the Samson when it sailed under his country’s flag. He had ten years’ experience at sea, and, unlike most of the newbie volunteer passengers, he knew how things were supposed to run.

Hearing Strom’s voice, Billy dashed to the bunker in a desperate attempt to hide again. But no luck. He was caught, pinned down by Strom’s strong tattooed arms until backup could come.

Excerpted from The Stowaway: A Young Man’s Extraordinary Adventure to Antarctica by Laurie Gwen Shapiro ($26; Simon & Schuster), available now.

Patagonia Baggies Are the Only Shorts Your Kids Need This Summer

The newest version is well-designed, flattering, and dries within 20 minutes. Get a few pairs for the whole family, and you won’t need to think about your summer adventure outfit ever again.

Summer days are for burning daylight at both ends, maximizing fun, and staying outside until dark. To make the most of the season, you need gear that works, every time, in all sorts of activities. You need a uniform. Not school uniforms, but adventure uniforms: proven, versatile pieces you reach for day in and day out that simplify your closet and streamline your transitions so you spend less time thinking about your gear and more time playing in it. I have backcountry skiing uniforms and running uniforms, Saturday uniforms for the farmer’s market, and mountain biking uniforms. Uniforms save me minutes each day, hours each month, and maybe days each year.

In summer, I turn to Patagonia Baggies. Made from Supplex nylon, Baggies are exceptionally light yet hardy, with a durable water-resistant (DWR) finish that dries within 20 minutes in direct sun. They were the only shorts I wore on a four-day family raft trip down the Rio Chama in northern New Mexico last month. I don them for after-dinner bike rides around town with my daughters, as a layering piece over mini yoga shorts, and I even wore them while taking a break from my chamois on a bikepacking trip to Bears Ears National Monument. I’ve worn them for the past week at our island cottage in Ontario: during morning kayaking and paddleboarding sessions, for cocktail hour on the porch, and DIY yoga on the dock.

(Courtesy of Katie Arnold)

As the origin story goes, Patagonia launched Baggies in 1982 as lightweight, fast-drying “beach shorts,” a technical knockoff of a pair of nylon shorts that company founder Yvon Chouinard spied in a window of an Oxnard, California, department store. Baggies have been a fixture in the summer catalog ever since. Like the Synchilla fleece snap top, they sold like crazy from the start. “Our best selling pieces were our least technical,” writes founder Yvon Chouinard in Let My People Go Surfing. My first pair, which I bought in college, sometime in the early ’90s, were purple with white mesh lining. Sized and styled for men, they were long and droopy, grazing the middle of my thigh, and far from flattering. I didn’t care. For rock-hopping along Vermont rivers and sea kayaking in Maine, there was nothing better; drain holes in the pockets let the water leak out. The mesh lining chafed my thighs when I went trail running, so I snipped it out with scissors.

When I bought my first pair of women’s-specific Barely Baggies last summer, I was a little leery. They seemed impossibly old-school, a retro hangover in a world of slim-fit boardshorts and skin-tight yoga shorts. Had the cut improved? Would they bunch up at my waist? Even without a liner and with the scaled-down 2.5-inch inseam, the sizing was a bit funky, the rise too short, and I had to size up. And yet they were the only shorts I wore, and not just because I had a broken leg and they were the only bottoms that fit over my cumbersome brace. I wore them because they were one less thing to think about in a summer when I had a lot of things, some of which were unpleasant, to think about.

This year’s Baggies are even better: a slightly longer rise on the 2.5-inch inseam makes them more flattering, even slimming. The drawstring waist lies flat without pinching and hides a small interior mesh pocket. The fit is baggy but not boxy; they’re true to size and hold their shape remarkably well, even after a week’s worth of wearing. The leg openings are wide enough for busting out a spontaneous set of squats or sun salutations. Baggies come in bright solid colors, but I recommend at least one pair of multicolor prints, ideal for disguising dirt for days on end.

Baggies come in five styles and inseam lengths for men, four for women, and seven for kids and babies, so you can geek out and pack the same pair of shorts for the whole family. My girls live in them for pack rafting trips, sailing and canoeing lessons, and kicking around the house. Kids’ Baggies come with all the same features as mine, so I know they’ll withstand the littles’ abuse. Best of all, a quick dunk in the lake or river washes them clean, which means less time doing laundry, more time having fun. That’s my kind of uniform.

Buy Now

A Simpsons Writer Takes on the Marathon

Joel Cohen hates running more than you do

As a quick search on Amazon will confirm, there’s no shortage of books on running available today. The spectrum is vast: from training and race guides, to works of memoir, fiction, and reportage. There’s even a 140-page comic book from the author of The Oatmeal on the highs and lows of a pursuit that is both addictive and vaguely masochistic. Perhaps the most prominent sub-category in the world of running literature is the marathon-training guide, typically a work of expertise authored by a former pro or elite-level coach, and brimming with advice on how to master 26.2 miles.
 
Now, Joel Cohen, a novice runner and long-time writer for The Simpsons, has made his own contribution to the genre. In the preface to How to Lose a Marathon: A Starter’s Guide to Finishing in 26.2 Chapters, Cohen touts his own credentials: he was the 26,792-place finisher in the 2013 New York City Marathon. While this might not qualify him to advise aspiring Olympians, it seems to have provided more than enough material for him to write an informative and vastly entertaining guide for beginners, as well as anyone who can appreciate the subtle absurdities of marathoning.
 
We spoke to Cohen about chafing, expo torture, and the obnoxiousness of running snobs.
 
OUTSIDE: Early in your book, you write: “I know I’m bad at sports, yet I still love sports. I love them as much as I hate exercise.” How would you define the difference between sports and exercise?
COHEN: I think sports are anything you are trying to win, even if it’s a friendly game. I’ve never experienced winning of any sort, but I’ve heard of it. Exercise is something like a spin class, or going for a gentle run, which I find is not as engaging as a competition. So I guess the definition of exercise is working out purely for working out’s sake, and sports is working out in a competitive sense. How’s that for a badly worded answer? The first of many, I promise. 
 
You cite (i.e. blame) Christopher McDougall’s Born to Run as an inspiration—specifically the book’s surprising revelation that people could actually enjoy running. Do you still run today and, if so, would you say you enjoy running more now?
I continue to run and continue to hate it. As the book says, when I run, my greatest strength is the volume of my podcast. I just crank it up and try to lose myself in whatever I’m listening to. Never music, because with music my mind wanders and I might realize I’m running. If I could ever afford one of those machines that exercise all your muscles in your sleep, I would never put on running shoes again.
 
You write that you never felt “runner’s high”—that it was more like you’d been sold a bag of runner’s oregano. But you do mention you enjoyed the feeling of having run. Can you explain that?
It’s sort of the way I also feel about writing. I find doing it is tedious and a chore. There are little moments of joy when you phrase something well (I say well because it’s never great), and then I’m so happy when I’m done. There are so many things in life that we just muddle through and never get that clear sense of being finished, but running was one of these things I could do for thirty minutes, an hour, or sometimes much longer, and there was that moment at the end when you were done. I just liked knowing I had done it—probably because I dreaded doing it so much.
 
You lament the attitude of certain running purists and snobs. You even invented a word for it: “pace-ist.” Would you say that this book is a kind of refutation of that mentality?
I literally didn’t know how long a marathon was until I looked it up. Then I researched, on the Internet, what a good marathon time was. There are all these running community chat rooms and there was this consensus where anything under four hours is respectable, but there’s a whole lot of hate out there for people who run slower marathons, slower being anything over four hours. Then I realized that that’s ridiculous. This challenge is so engaging that it’s enough if someone does it—regardless of what the time is. I felt like the world accepted that, although there is still this judgment in the community of pace-ists.
 
On the subject of gear, there’s a chapter in which you make the bold decision to run in shoes, then go on to discuss various types of running gear and what you think is necessary and what isn’t.
Aside from a great pair of shoes, one thing that was mandatory for me was Body Glide. Body Glide, or something similar, to stop the chafing. I write a lot about chafing in the book. I would have smoke pouring out of my shorts quite often if I didn’t use the stuff. So that really saved—maybe not my life—but parts of my anatomy that maybe no one cares that they’re safe.
 
In figuring out what pace you should try to run, you used Oprah as your running muse. Why Oprah?
I had no concept of what a good pace was when I felt started running, and I kind of just fell into a natural pace for the longer runs that I had to do. Once I found out that I was running at near ten-minute mile pace, give or take, I started to look for somebody whom I could kind of identify with and, in my competition-oriented mind, challenge myself against. And Oprah, very famously among the running community as I came to learn, had run four hours and thirty minutes, which is roughly ten-minute miles. So I my mind I decided I was going to be running against Oprah.
 
You ran 4:26:03, which means you were successful in beating Oprah. Congratulations.
Thank you. She felt too humiliated to call me and congratulate me herself. But I see my voicemail light is on, so maybe that’s her.
 
Among other things, you also include a glossary of running terms. Is there a running term or expression that you find particularly silly or amusing?
I still don’t know if I really understand “negative splits.” I came to learn what a split was, but a negative split I never fully understood. But when someone explains it to me now, I’d know how to nod at the right time.
 
In a chapter on injuries, you name a few of the ugly things you can get from running, including blisters, black toenails, and road race T-shirts. Did you get any injuries while training for your marathon?
I definitely got plantar fasciitis. I also lost several toenails. Let’s take a moment of silence in their memory. The big thing is that on a couple of occasions, I just clumsily rolled my ankle in a gruesome, horrible way. I dealt with it by lying on the ground and crying and then limping back to my car and not running for two or three days. Also by wearing this incredibly erotic tensor bandage around my ankle. What are they called? ACE bandages, I think. 
 
On the subject of marathon expos you write: “I had no idea what a marathon ‘expo’ was. Now that I do, I miss those earlier days of blissful ignorance.” Why the hard feelings?
The one thing that’s always bothered me is that they force you to go. You can’t pick up your bib in any other place. And you quickly understand that you’ve been lured into this store, this marketplace for running garbage. It’s like being at a museum or amusement park and exiting through the gift shop. I never liked that feeling of being the forced consumer. That said, at the New York Marathon expo, I bought a shirt, gloves, and a bunch of crap. So I guess the system works. Maybe my book is being pushed on some poor suckers right now at some marathon expo.

Are you likely to run another marathon in the future?
I don’t know. I think the Berlin Marathon would be a fun one to run. But then I also heard recently that you can rollerblade the Berlin Marathon on the Saturday before. Then I thought that is a lot easier and I wouldn’t have to train, and wouldn’t it be cool to rollerblade through Berlin. Also, you get a medal, which I figure I can quickly show and no one will know what I got it for.

Don’t Fall for the Resilient Federal Forests Act

>

If your house is engulfed in flames, you may have a pesky environmental group to blame.

This is the argument made by supporters of the Resilient Federal Forests Act of 2017, introduced by Republican Representative Bruce Westerman of Arkansas.The bill passed the House in November, and is now waiting to be discussed by the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry. 

With each fire this past summer and fall, the bill’s supporters renewed their calls for something to be done to end the devastation, and this bill has an interesting answer to why wildfires have become so large and so deadly in recent years. Essentially, it blames the problem on the conservationists who sue to keep loggers out of forests. As a remedy, the bill aims to scale back public input, reduce wildlife habitat protections, and weaken environmental standards. If passed, a timber company could log an area up to 30,000 acres (twice the size of Manhattan) with barely any environmental review. 

There’s no doubt that the country’s system for managing fires is inadequate. Forest fires are about four times as expensive to fight today as they were 20 years ago, and in many parts of the country, fire season could soon last 300 days. In regions affected by pests or disease, selective logging can do a great deal to stop those ailments from spreading. When old or dying trees are taken out of the picture, competition for sunlight and other resources is less intense, giving younger shoots and smaller flora an opportunity to grow. But when this fuel is allowed to accumulate and crowd, it can turn what would have been a small fire into the type of untamable disasters California has experienced. 

“We saw millions of acres go up in smoke this year, dozens of lives lost, and thousands of homes destroyed, because of unmanaged, unhealthy forest,” says David Saylor, a spokesperson for Westerman. “And that has to change. This isn’t about logging. This is about maintaining a healthy forest.”

The question is, what defines smart tree harvesting, and how is it best regulated? Westerman is a former forester, and he now receives more campaign contributions from the timber and paper industries than any member of Congress save house speaker Paul Ryan. His bill would do away with many of the environment regulations a logging company must satisfy before a sale takes place. It seems to say that the best approach to tree harvesting is to allow logging companies unfettered access and focuses almost exclusively on regulations, ignoring problems like lack of funding, a recent surge of pine beetles in the West, climate change, or the slightly nutty and hubristic tendency to treat every wildfire as an innate catastrophe that must be controlled and contained.

“Thousands of lawsuits have been filed by these groups to prevent the Forest Service from pursuing routine thinning and restoration projects,” wrote Utah representative Rob Bishop, a co-sponsor of the bill, in an op-ed for The Hill. “As more and more time and money are consumed by regulatory analysis and court battles, scarce agency resources are expended and fewer acres of high-risk forest lands are treated.”

Bishop may have a point, if an overstated one. Of the 1,100 land-management lawsuits brought against the Forest Service between 1989 to 2008, the majority were brought on environmental grounds. The Forest Service is also required to foot the legal bill. That cost, however, takes up a tiny sliver of the Forest Service’s overall budget—less than one-tenth of one percent. U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell said as much at an April 2013 hearing before the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. The fees, he testified, “did not have an appreciable effect on program funding.”

Both Bishop and Westerman are critics of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), which requires the government to conduct impact studies before developing or extracting resources on federal land. Bishop has called the policy one of the “greatest burdens” to industry, and accused environmental groups of abusing the act with “an unholy combination of activist litigation designed to manipulate policy.” Among other things, Westerman’s bill would drastically scale back NEPA’s protections, allowing companies to log in forests without first reviewing the impacts on water quality, the habitat, or wildlife. It would allow the Forest Service to bypass consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service when an animal protected by the Endangered Species Act is impacted by logging. If a company did damage the environment, Westerman’s bill would bar people from suing or otherwise holding the government accountable.

The Resilient Federal Forests Act seems to focus almost entirely on addressing complaints from the logging industry—and not on the problem of worsening wildfires. Arizona Representative Raul Grijalva, the ranking Democrat for the House Natural Resources Committee, has criticized the bill as “not about forest health. It’s about increasing the numbers of trees removed from the forest.” 

The crazy thing is, the logging industry doesn’t always seem all that eager to gain access to Forest Service land, even in some of the most valuable old-growth forests. Jim Furnish, a former deputy chief of the Forest Service, says the Big Thorne timber auction in Tongass National Forest is a prime example. In 2014, the Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, the Alaska Wilderness League, and the Sierra Club filed a joint suit against the Forest Service to stop the deal, saying the Forest Service had underestimated the impact on the local wolf population, and overestimated the industry’s appetite. The Forest Service estimated the 150 million board feet of timber up for auction would fetch $2.6 million. But it spent $15.7 million building logging roads, conducting surveys, and all the other things that go into prepping a forest to be cut. In all of Tongass, the Forest Service reported a $108.7 million loss on timber contracts from 2008 to 2012.  The Forest Service won the suit, and last May the deal went through—albeit at a much smaller volume than expected. Citing “market forces,” the ranger’s office reported a sale of only 97.7 million board feet.

“If nobody buys them, nobody buys them,” Furnish says of huge amount of timber leases that go unsold each year.

There’s one benefit Furnish can point to in the Resilient Federal Forests Act: it would allow the Forest Service to more easily tap federal emergency funds during fire season. But on the whole, he says, the bill is “totally unnecessary.” In fact a lot of the bureaucracy that slowed thinning and forest management has already been addressed by the 2014 Farm Bill, which made it easier for the Forest Service to authorize local projects and expedited approval for thinning diseased, insect-infested, or fire-damaged forests. 

So why did Westerman introduce the bill? 

It’s hard to understand how bypassing the environmental review process before a harvest—or reducing the public comment period—will help this country fight fires. As written, the bill seems much less focused on the efficiency of fighting fires than it is on the efficiency of logging. It won’t generate more cash to fight fires, but it will be a great help to anyone trying to log forests with as little interference as possible. And if that’s the bill's goal, then wildfires provide a compelling, urgent, and dramatic excuse.  

5 Last Minute Father’s Day Gifts for Under $50

Still don’t know what to get dad? We’ve got you covered.

Great Father’s Day gifts don’t have to cost three digits. Case in point: the following gear. 


Poler Stuff Dope Dopp Kit ($30)

(Courtesy Poler)

The Dope is just big enough to carry all your dad's grooming essentials on the road. It also works just as well for fishing gear. 

Buy Now


​Epic Animal Oil ($10)

(Courtesy Epic Bar)

Butter is great for cooking. But you know what’s even better? Pure animal fat. If your dad is the family chef, consider one or all of these oils, which can be used as a butter replacement in a variety of dishes. Choose from beef, pork, duck, or bison fat, all made by Epic, which makes jerky, bars, and trail mix for the Paleo set.  

Buy Now


Black Diamond Astro Headlamp ($20)

(Courtesy Black Diamond)

New for 2017, the Astro packs 150 lumens and nearly 40 hours of burn time into a package that’s barely bigger than a box of Tic-Tacs. Consider this headlamp the latest addition to your dad’s day pack. 

Buy Now


United by Blue Inlet Enamel Steel Mug ($20)

(Courtesy United by Blue)

There are fancier coffee mugs out there, and this one doesn't say “World’s Best Dad.” But we dig the design, which shows the sun setting over the San Juan Islands. Plus, it’s burly enough to be set right on a stove or campfire. 

Buy Now


Otterbox DryBox ($40)

(Courtesy Otterbox)

Otterbox’s new DryBox has 55 cubic inches of storage space, which is big enough for a large smartphone, keys, and wallet, but small enough to slip into a daypack. 

Buy Now

2017 Was the Year of Women's Climbing

>

In September, while traveling back from the World Cup in Italy, a young Belgian climber named Anak Verhoeven stopped at Pierrot Beach, in France, and made the first ascent of a very difficult route. Snaking up a partially overhanging wall of limestone, the route traces its way along rough, wheat-hued rock face interspersed with dark gray vertical bands of mineral calcite. For a climber, it requires raw strength and highly technical footwork. Verhoeven had tried the route before, but fog and cold blasts of wind from the north had made it unclimbable. This year, the weather cooperated. After sending the route, Verhoeven gave it a 9a+ grade—a 5.15a in the American system.

If the route is confirmed, 21-year-old Verhoeven will be the first woman to have completed such a demanding first ascent. (Every climbing route that has been sent by someone receives a grade, which is then confirmed or modified by the next person who climbs it.)

Grades like 5.15a describe climbs that are exceedingly difficult. The first widely recognized 5.15 climb, called Realization/Biographie, was done in 2001 by Chris Sharma and has been repeated by only a handful of elite climbers. When Verhoeven sent the route at Pierrot Beach, no one else had ever climbed it before, and only one woman had climbed a 5.15 at all—Margo Hayes.

Almost immediately after Verhoeven sent it, a debate broke out whether the route was difficult enough to qualify for the grade. Some people retaliated against the skepticism, saying the only reason people were raising questions about the route’s grading was because Verhoeven is a woman. “When a woman climbs a first ascent, it’s always difficult for people to accept what she thinks about it,” Verhoeven told me. “I wanted to accept the challenge and go for it. I knew I had done something special.”

Verhoeven’s story should sound familiar to anyone with a passing interest in climbing news. This has been a monster year for firsts by women climbers: In February, Margo Hayes became the first woman to do any route graded a consensus 5.15a, on La Rambla in Spain, and she followed it up in September with a send of Sharma’s Realization/Biographie. Last month, Austria’s Angela Eiter climbed the 5.15b La Planta de Shiva route in Spain, becoming the third person—female or male—ever to send it. While Alex Honnold’s free solo of El Capitan has dazzled climbing spectators and Adam Ondra’s send of the first 5.15d set a new benchmark, the top women athletes in climbing have also been breaking records and generally thumbing their noses at perceptions of gender limits.

“It’s been an awesome year. I think that the whole breaking the 5.15 barrier was a giant thing,” says Chris Noble, author of Women Who Dare: North America’s Most Inspiring Women Climbers. The preponderance of climbing gyms and groundbreaking achievements making women climbers into role models over the past few decades has propelled a new generation into the sport. And as the new generation comes into maturity, they’re likely to push the bar of what’s possible even higher. Hayes’ mentor and climber Robyn Erbesfield-Raboutou told me that the women of this generation are motivating each other and “believing in themselves through the success of the other women who are out there pushing the limits.”

Steph Davis attributed the change to more female role models. “The generations before had very few,” she wrote in an email, “and as a result, it was harder to push forward—we all stand on the shoulders of those who come before.”

But most of this year’s accomplishments by a woman have also been accompanied by a swarm of questions about grading and legitimacy.

That second-guessing has a historical precedent. Climbing traces its roots to the alpinist tradition, which in its early days favored aristocratic gentlemen. When they weren’t literally encumbered by skirts, women were dismissed simply for being women. In a 1934 article for National Geographic detailing her ascent of the Aiguille du Grépon in the Mont Blan Massif, pioneering alpinist Miriam O’Brien noted that a French alpinist had bewailed her success. The Grépon climb, he said, had as good as disappeared, since no self-respecting man would attempt the ascent after it had been done by a woman.

Then came Lynn Hill’s historic free ascent of the Nose route in 1993, for which she climbed the looming bow of El Capitan in a harness but didn’t use ropes to help her up the 2,900-foot ascent. Though it didn’t make big news at the time, Hill’s feat proved to be a paradigm changer. Hill—who had already cemented her name in the sport by being the first woman to free-climb a 5.12d route (1979), the first woman to redpoint (free-climb after practicing beforehand) a 5.14 (1991), and the first woman to on-sight a 5.13b route (1992)—reached the top of the Nose in 1993 after four days of climbing. Afterward, she appeared in a cheeky ad campaign for climbing shoes next to a bold proclamation of her route: “It goes, boys!”

Yet even that triumph didn’t remain untarnished. For years, doubters have dismissed Hill’s feat by saying that it was only thanks to her small fingers that she was able to traverse the most difficult pitches. “There are certain people who want to be locked into the old paradigm because it suits their comfort somehow, that they are stronger just because they’re a man,” Hill told me.

Before Margo Hayes became the first woman to climb a 5.15a, another prodigious climber, Ashima Shiraishi, sent a route that she thought was graded 5.15a because of a recently broken hold. That route was subsequently kept at 5.14d or given a slash grade—although some climbers added another pitch that they claim makes the route a solid 5.15a. In the 1980s and 1990s, champion rock climber Bobbi Bensman saw two routes she sent get downgraded—a boulder problem called Better Eat Your Wheaties that was down-rated to V8 and a 5.14a route in Rifle called Slice of Life that was down-rated to 5.13d. Bensman sees the downgrades as blatant sexism. “I mean, women have been battling this shit for years,” she told me.

Since climbing grades are subjective, there has been a lot of discussion about how valuable they are. Some people say they belie the philosophy of climbing altogether or that they’re a petty obsession of neophytes. Grades can be useful for defining the outer limits of current human capacity, but then again, every climb reflects an intimate synergy between human and rock: The idiosyncrasies of each route will interact differently with the strengths and weaknesses of every climber. Hill told me that her small size did help on some parts of the Nose, but she said that on other parts, it was a challenge. “It’s true that men have an advantage in some ways, but women have advantages in other ways,” she said. “So, as long as we all use our tools and whatever we’re given, then who cares?”

Whether or not men will take them seriously, the young, visionary climbers of this generation are poised to keep breaking barriers. Verhoeven, the Belgian climber, is imminently humble about her 5.15a grade and told me that she is eager to hear the opinions of other climbers. But she is also no baseless aggrandizer. Last year, before inclement weather drove her from the route at Pierrot Beach, Verhoeven visited another wall in southeastern France, called Ma Belle Ma Muse. It’s a short, intense route requiring crimps on narrow handholds. After six days at the wall, she sent the route. Local climbers had suggested a 9a (5.14d) grade for it, but Verhoeven thought that was too high. She gave it an 8c+ (5.14c).

This year, after Verhoeven climbed her first ascent, she named the route Sweet Neuf, because it was a linkup between a route called Home Sweet Home and another called Sang Neuf. It’s an apt name. Sang Neuf, in French, means new blood.

The Ultimate Camp Kitchen

Cooking and eating under the stars is one of the biggest joys of road life. Here’s the gear we’ve settled on to make it work.

When we bought Artemis, the Airstream, the previous owners proudly declared that they had never cooked inside her. We thought that was ludicrous: Why drive around with a full kitchen and not use it? Since then, we’ve come around, prepping and cooking outside as often as we can

There are a few major disadvantages to cooking inside. The heat can make sleeping uncomfortable on hot nights and odors tend to linger in such a small space. There’s also the hassle of cleaning up grease splatter and food mess. More to the point, if you’re cooking inside, you’re not outside, which was a major motivation for hitting the road in the first place. 

In order to cook outside almost nighty, we had to gear up with quality outdoor kitchen ware. First came the perfect grill and, naturally, camp chairs, both of which we procured quickly. Since then, we’ve slowed down on purchases as we weigh our needs and sift through the options. The results are, for us, a small, tightly curated (with the exception of the ice cream medicine ball) selection of things that we love. Here they are. 

The Table 

A table might seem like a simple thing, but it has proved a conundrum. In campgrounds, you already have a picnic table, so a portable secondary feels excessive. However, after too many meals while dry camping of trying to cut elk steaks from precariously lap-balanced plates, we succumbed.

We wanted something nice, easy to set up, simple to stow, and, most of all, stable. After trying quite a few, we went with the SnowPeak Single Action Table Medium ($329), which we like, but don’t yet love. The pros: the bamboo is durable and looks great; it swivels open and closed easily; once erected, it’s as unfaltering as your home table; it has a simple carrying case to protect it. The cons: it’s a bit heavy and bulky; it ain’t cheap; and it's tall. Standing 26 inches, it’s good for eating but sits too high relaxing around before and after meals.

We’re considering trading down for Snow Peak’s low version of this table, or the low round one. The quality and design of all three are impeccable. It’s just a matter of figuring out what works best for the most occasions. Spend some time in the store before you buy to make sure you get it right. Even bring your camp chairs to the store with you, as it’s the only way you’ll know what works.

Buy Now

The Glass 

Dinner in Artemis almost always begins Mad Men style: big and brown. Apart from a full-silver mug, I’ve found nothing better for bourbon than HydroFlask 10-oz Rocks ($30) glass. The insulated stainless steel walls keep ice from melting out and ruining your drink, and the glass just feels good in the hand. It also doubles just fine as a coffee mug in the morning.

Buy Now

The Utensils  

After the table, cutlery was the next biggest challenge. I like a good knife when I’m cooking, but I didn’t necessarily want my fine home stuff bouncing around the inside of a drawer. Then I found the Snowpeak Cutting Board Set L ($56). The knife didn’t arrive quite as sharp as my chef’s knife back home, but it was still sharp and has held an edge since I got it re-ground locally. I love the way the knife packs into the backside of the folding, red birch case, which doubles, once paged open, as a cutting board. Smart! Because our drawer space is limited, we also picked up GSI Outdoors’ Pivot Tongs, Spatula, and Spoon ($6 each), serving utensils that are strong as your home stuff in use, but clock-dial in half to take up less room in the cupboard.

Buy Now

The Cookware

Early on, we bought the Lodge 3.2-quart Cast Iron Combo Cooker ($62), a Dutch oven consisting of a nice nesting saucepan and fry pan. It works great, and I wouldn’t trade it. However, we’ve noticed that the cast iron takes a long time to fully heat, which means you’re either burning off a lot of propane or cooking when the pot’s not ready. As a fix, we went to our local Asian market and picked up an inexpensive (think: $26) wok, which heats super fast and cooks super evenly. We use it basically as much as the cast iron, and though I feel as though I should get rid of one or the other, all three pieces fit in their cabinet, so, for now, I’m hanging onto both. 

Buy Now

The Food Storage 

Because of the bulk and empty space, food storage for leftovers is an issue. I refused to travel with Tupperware for the first year just because of the clutter. Thankfully we found Sea To Summit X-Seal and Go collapsible storage sets. Constructed of silicone sides with hard plastic tops and bottoms, these vessels accordion open and closed and, ingeniously, stow flat inside one another. We got the large set to start, but as these come in all manner of shapes and sizes, our collection is likely to increase.

Buy Now

The Totally Essential Ice Cream Ball 

I hate clutter and never would have bought it, but we received the Industrial Rev Softshell Ice Cream Ball ($35) for a Christmas gift this year, and truthfully, I’ve come to love it. Look: it’s bulky, dorky, and fiddly. But, with a little ice and rock salt, as well as some cream, sugar, and flavors, you can whip up some mean ice cream. If you haven’t eaten homemade ice cream while camping, you’re missing out—there’s possibly no greater extravagance in life. Chucking the ball around camp to help dessert set is a good laugh, too. A word of advice, though: If you’re boondocking and water is tight, make sure you’re on the mixing end of the equation and someone else is on clean-up as mopping out the sticky, goopy leftovers is the worst bit.

Buy Now

Testing the Nike Pro Hijab

>

Muslim athletes are a regular presence on the world’s most elite podiums. Take Ibtihaj Muhammad, the fencer who took home bronze at the 2016 Summer Olympics.And hurdler Dalilah Muhammad, who won gold in the 400 meters in Rio. I am a nine-time marathoner and a two-time sprint triathlete. I have run 15 half marathons and am on a quest to run all six World Major marathons. I was also the first hijab-wearing woman to make an appearance on the cover of a U.S. fitness magazine: Women’s Running, in 2016.

Yet one challenge for those of us who cover our hair while competing is the relative lack of performance hijabs. While Muslim-owned brands like Capsters, Asiya Sport, and Sukoon Active have produced athletic hijabs for almost a decade now, no major U.S. athletic brand had entered this market—until now.

On December 7, the $35 Nike Pro Hijab went on sale online. (Nike's out of stock at the moment but bringing it back in late spring.) The swoosh above the left ear is what excited me the most. My dream as a Muslim athlete is to be able to walk into a running store and shop from various athletic hijabs, Muslim-made or not, and the fact that the biggest sports brand in the world took the initiative to make one is heartening.

Last month, I tried out the Pro while running. I found that it’s best suited to low-impact activities, as they require fewer movements that can cause the hijab to slip. In these environments, I appreciated Nike’s Dri-Fit technology—with tiny holes perforating the polyester—which felt light and breathable in sweaty studios.

I didn’t like the Pro nearly as much for more dynamic activities, such as running and yoga. During my runs around Milford, Michigan, I found that the hijab slipped often. My hair was constantly slipping out the front when I ran, and I kept having to pull the Pro back so my forehead would be uncovered. It’s possible to reduce this slippage by wearing an undercap, yet this would obviously reduce the hijab’s breathability. And the Pro made my head appear—as we hijabis like to say—“egg-headed.”

So how does the Pro stack up to the other hijabs I’ve tried? I’d say it comes in at a solid second place.

Nike’s offering performs better on runs than Sukoon’s, which is made of merino wool and wraps around the wearer’s head with Velcro atop an undercap.This is good for colder weather. Sukoon’s design is street-friendly and the least odd-looking, but I found it too cumbersome for warm-weather activities. The Pro is more breathable than hijabs I’ve tried from Capsters, which are made from a heavy fabric that traps sweat and weighs down my head when waterlogged.

In my mind, the best performance hijabs are made by Asiya Sport. They’re made with an ultralightweight fabric that I found breathes well and feels supersoft against the skin. Composed of a polyester-spandex blend, Asiya’s hijabs are light and versatile, have no fringes to deal with, and are easy to put on. The only downside is that there’s too little material around the neck, so it has a tendency to come loose while I’m running. Asiya hijabs also have that “egg-headed” look, so I wear them under a cap.

Surprisingly, it’s the non-hijab headgear that I find works best. Buffs are often my go-to choice for everyday runs. They’re versatile and easy to put on and, honestly, the best I’ve found as far as aesthetics go. Top one with a hat and high-collared top and I’m good to go. Besides, I can find them at any running shop.

Icebreaker, Smartwool, and the Future of Wool

>

In the past month, two big changes have rocked the merino market. 

First, apparel conglomerate VF Corporation, the parent company of brands including the North Face, Lee, and Timberland, announced its plan to acquire New Zealand-based Icebreaker Holdings. The purchase—valued at more than $100 million—is particularly notable because VF also owns another wool heavyweight: Smartwool, which it bought in 2011. 

Four days after news of that acquisition broke, reports swirled that Ibex, a smaller, high-end merino brand, had laid off nearly half of the staff at its home office in Vermont and was headed for bankruptcy. Late last week, Ibex announced plans to shut down entirely. “As much as Ibex has succeeded and created opportunities for itself, it has also dealt with the headwinds of seasonal volatility, shifts in the retail landscape and an ever-changing consumer,” Ibex CEO Ted Manning wrote in a November statement.

While these two developments aren’t directly linked, they are indicative of an outdoor industry facing a steady attrition of smaller, independent brands. “In general, the outdoor business is not nearly as good as it was three years ago,” says Matt Powell, outdoor industry analyst for the NPD Group. “It’s a difficult time to be a small brand or a small retailer. The pressures have never been greater.”

“The industry seems to be going in the direction where a lot of more niche brands are being snapped up by larger companies,” he says. 

In leaner times, small brands can get overextended if earnings don't keep pace with expenses. Being part of a bigger company, on the other hand, tends to allow for more flexibility, helping companies weather dips in sales. Parent companies can reduce brands’ operational costs, allowing them to tap into large-scale manufacturing, transportation, and other resources. That’s part of why Powell believes the recent acquisition is a good move for Icebreaker, just as it was for its new sister brand six years ago. “The Smartwool acquisition has been a positive for the brand,” he says. “This is going to give Icebreaker a bit more capital and access to distribution that they didn’t have before.”

Consumers may benefit from this boost in efficiency. Increasing sales volume in the U.S., Asia, and Eastern Europe could lead to cheaper Icebreaker goods, company chairman Rob Fyfe told a New Zealand newspaper. “We could double the size of our business in the next five years,” he told the reporter. “That would have a material impact on unit prices.”

Lower price tags aren't the only change buyers should expect. Once competitors, Smartwool and Icebreaker must now reposition themselves as counterparts. What will that mean for their brand identities? A representative from VF Corporation says it’s too soon to say, but one thing is likely: consumers will notice a shift in one or both brands at some point after the acquisition is complete early next year. The merino wool market is still a relatively small segment of the overall outdoor industry, so VF will want to ensure the two brands appeal to distinct customer bases. “You don’t want them competing with each other,” Powell says. “Clearly they will draw a distinction.”

That brand differentiation could take shape in a number of ways. Perhaps one focuses on technical apparel while the other becomes more of a lifestyle brand. Or maybe Smartwool reverts back to its beginnings as primarily a sock supplier. Or the brands might delineate based on price. “Potentially, you could see one being more focused on mid-market and one on up-market,” Powell says. “VF has tremendous strength in mid-market categories, like Lee.”

The bottom line? There are some wolves circling the merino industry, with some brands herding together, and another getting picked off. We'll see if coming together helps them in 2018. 

The Best T- Shirts for $25 or Less

Re-stock your shirt drawer with some of our favorite tees

The T-shirt is the peanut butter and jelly sandwich of your wardrobe; something you absolutely have to have but don’t necessarily need to spend a lot of money on. We found five killer tees, for men and women, made from comfy cotton to fast-drying performance blends, that will keep your t-shirt drawer fresh this summer. 


Meridian Line Captain Bird Beard Shirt ($25)

(Courtesy Meridian Line)

All of Meridian Line shirts are printed from hand drawn sketches by artist Jeremy Collins. Captain Bird Beard is Collins’ interpretation of a folk legend from the Manganese Mountains who was born in a cave and raised by wolves. The shirt itself is a combo of polyester, rayon, and cotton. 

Buy Now


Prana Redlands Shirt ($20) 

(Courtesy Prana)

This lightweight tee is a blend of organic cotton (Fair Trade Certified) and polyester for long-lasting comfort, while the hand-drawn graphic emphasizes your climbing cred. And it’s slim fit, because it’s Prana, after all. 

Buy Now


The North Face Crag Crew ($25) 

(Courtesy The North Face)

The North Face has a surprising number of low-cost T-shirts, but we dig the Crag Crew, a fast-drying performance tank made from their proprietary FlashDry material that wicks moisture and dries on the fly. It’s also UPF 15 rated.

Buy Now


Under Armour Charged Cotton V-Neck ($25) 

(Courtesy Under Armour)

UA calls the cotton polyester blend in this performance tee “Charged Cotton.” It’s soft like cotton, but wicks well and dries fast. We like the casual fit of this V-neck, which is tough to find in a performance-minded tee. 

Buy Now


Stio Van Life Shirt ($20) 

(Courtesy Stio)

Jackson Hole-based Stio uses original artwork by local artist Stephen Brewer on a pre-shrunk, tri-blend fabric. Even if your day job/family/lack of van prohibits you from living the #vanlife, you can still rock the shirt. 

Buy Now