Save 25 Percent on YETI Insulated Drinkware

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

We’re positive that no one on your holiday gift list would complain about finding a YETI Rambler under the tree this year. Fortunately, for you and them, the red and white colorways are currently 25 percent off at REI. Add the product to your cart to see the promotional price. 

Walk around the Outside offices and you’re guaranteed to see one of these tumblers on most editors’ desks. They’re a staff favorite for morning coffee, afternoon tea, and everything in between. The MagSlider lid doesn’t completely seal, but it will stop your beverage from splashing on your morning commute.

Buy Now


If you have a coffee or tea lover on your list, this mug is a good gift choice. The 14-ounce mug sits low and has a sturdy handle that fits three to four fingers for a solid grip.

Buy Now


The big brother to the smaller 20-ounce Rambler, the 30-ounce size utilizes Yeti’s signature double-wall construction but offers a little extra room.

Buy Now


Perfect for coffee or mixed drinks, the Lowball is made from high quality 18/8 stainless steel with double-wall vacuum insulation to keep beverages warm or cold longer.

Buy Now


The Colster is designed to fit perfectly around any standard can and helps keep your beer or soda frosty on hot summer days. The gasket even fits around glass bottles.

Buy Now


This 26-ounce vacuum bottle seals completely, so you can throw it in your bag without worrying about spillage. It comes with a leakproof lid, but if you prefer easy-drinking access, a straw and chug-cap top are also available.

Buy Now

The Best Gear We've Ever Reviewed, Now on Sale

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

REI’s winter sale is one of the best times to stock up on gear for the upcoming season. This year’s sale runs from November 9 through November 19. To help you filter through the deals, we picked out products we’ve already reviewed—and loved—from the sale list. Consider your holiday shopping well on its way.

Looking for more sale coverage? Check out our favorite overall deals, these great deals under $30, the best fitness gear deals, and the gear our editors are most excited to purchase from the sale.

About Our Deals Coverage

We work with top retailers and brands to find the best deals on outdoor gear. Then our editors and writers carefully review the sales to select the products we’ve used and trust. When you click a Buy Now button in this story, it will take you to the brand whose sale we’re covering.

Review our affiliate link policy

The winner of our multitool review a few years ago, the Wave boasts an all-metal design and 18 tools that lock in place.

Buy Now

Our tester loved the Vibe because it has drainage ports and a nonabsorbent footbed but doesn’t look like a traditional dorky water shoe.

Buy Now

This popular fleece is our editor’s go-to fall running layers for its tight-fitting cut and sweat-wicking gridded fleece.

Buy Now

In our 2018 Winter Buyer’s Guide, our tester challenged any reader to wear through the burly nubuck leather of this winter boot.

Buy Now

The Stormtracker made our list of best budget ski gloves, thanks in part to the streamlined design, which offers excellent dexterity.

Buy Now

Way back in 2012, we called the Helio one of the best car camping accessories. We stand by that claim, as numerous Outside editors still use it today.

Buy Now

This hoodie inspired an entire hoodie review in last year’s Summer Buyer’s Guide.

Buy Now

We consider this jacket to be one of the best lightweight rain jackets on the market.

Buy Now

When it was first released, in 2010, we called the Snowshot “one of the least expensive jackets in our test but also a tester favorite.”

Buy Now

If you need simple, functional running pants, look no further than the Threshold, which we featured in our 2018 Winter Buyer’s Guide.

Buy Now

We called the Squad XL, a favorite from this year’s Buyer’s Guide, perfect for “larger faces and smaller wallets.”

Buy Now

Without question, these are among our favorite ski socks. They’re warm, thin, and good-looking, and at $17, the price is right.

Buy Now

The Vantage was the favorite helmet we tested last year for its low-profile design and two-part venting system.

Men's Women's

Don’t skimp on your avy beacon. This one made it into our 2017 Winter Buyer’s Guide for its intuitive usability and range.

Buy Now

The Kamber nails the details, like carefully positioned pockets that can be opened even when you have a snowboard or skis strapped to the pack’s sides.

Buy Now

Our Gear Guy called this “maybe the world’s best flannel.”

Buy Now

We consider these the best snowshoes for moving fast through ice conditions.

Buy Now

The double layer of material on the knee make these quick-drying and stretchy nylon pants a favorite of the climbers in our office.

Buy Now

Most Outside editors have a similar set to this in their camping boxes. Why? Enamelware will hold up to years of banging around a campsite.

Buy Now

A Story About Living in a Van by the River

When your life is a Saturday Night Live skit

From 2012 to 2014, I lived full time out of a 2005 Chevy Astrovan. I had moved out of an apartment and into my car in 2011, and after six months of it, decided it was a little cramped, and dropped my life savings on a questionable all-wheel-drive burgundy van that I bought from a small car dealership called Johnny’s Auto Sales and Pawn on South Broadway in Denver.

I had a remote copywriting job that I could theoretically do from anywhere, so I pushed it as far as I could, driving around the West, hunting down Wi-Fi at coffee shops and public libraries, sleeping on a cheap mattress in the back of my van, climbing, backpacking, dropping in on friends frequently, and generally avoiding staying in one place for very long. It was #vanlife, sort of, but without the aesthetic converted van and high-quality Instagramming of life in said aesthetic van. I drummed up as many adventure/outdoor writing gigs as I could, and eventually, in summer 2012, I quit my copywriting job to be a full time adventure writer, a job I basically made up as I went, and continue to make up as I go now.

Every once in awhile, I would find myself chatting with someone, and they would ask where I lived or where I was based. I would reply, “I live in a van.”

Often, if the person had been alive in the early 1990s or otherwise aware of Chris Farley’s Saturday Night Live character Matt Foley, Motivational Speaker, they would joke, “down by the river?” referencing Foley’s famous line:

Sometimes, I would reply to the Van Down by the River joke, “funny story about that.”

When I was 16 and a junior in high school in New Hampton, Iowa, in 1995, a few friends and I created a five-minute skit for the school’s variety show. Unlike the rest of the variety show acts, which were earnest acting and musical performances (and of course far more well-thought out and practiced), ours was basically a vehicle for our friend Dan to do an impersonation of Chris Farley’s Matt Foley character. We were not in theater, and three of us, Tony, Brian, and myself, were basically just stage props for Dan as he did his thing. Besides Dan, none of us had many lines to learn or rehearse—I only had one line, and I had since sort of forgotten about it until my parents unearthed an old VHS tape of the skit a few years ago.

The audio is fairly muddy, but I remembered almost all the dialogue. At about 2:05, Dan asks me, “Now son, what do you want to do with your life?”

I reply, “I want to be a writer.”

Dan expresses doubt in my dream of being a writer, sarcastically asking Tony (playing my father) if “that looks like William Shakespeare over there,” and then goes on to warn me that, of course, I would end up living in a van down by the river.

A short 17 years later, I was a writer, and I lived in a van, which I usually tried to park for the night somewhere free and dark, since I didn’t have anything covering the windows. Occasionally, I parked my van down by the river.

So I guess dreams do come true.

Interior's Stealthy Plan to Hide Public Records

>

When a government agency wants to attract as little public attention as possible to a new policy, it announces it on a Friday at 4 p.m. Eastern, a time at which many reporters are eyeing the clock in anticipation of happy hour. If the policy is really controversial, the agency will announce it just before a holiday. And if the policy is really, really controversial, the agency won’t even make an announcement, it will simply post it in the Federal Register—ideally between Christmas and New Year’s.

That’s what the Department of Interior (DOI) did on December 28, when it submitted proposed changes to how it will manage public requests under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Such requests are one of the main tools journalists and advocacy groups use to learn details about government activities, and they can lead to kinds of revelations that ultimately forced Secretary of Interior Ryan Zinke out last month. Though he once said he planned to run “the most transparent Interior” in our lifetime, it was hardly surprising at this point that Zinke, who scribbled an inscrutable final goodbye with a chunky red pen last week, would approve an attempt to undercut Americans’ access to information about the workings of the DOI.

The proposed changes would give the agency almost unlimited discretion to deny FOIA requests. In the Federal Registry notice, the DOI says that in “light of the unprecedented surge in FOIA requests and litigation,” it would now deny  “burdensome” or “vague” requests, or those that require “the bureau to locate, review, redact, or arrange for inspection of a vast quantity of material.”

What is a vast quantity of material? What is burdensome or vague? For the time being, it’s anyone’s guess. Because of the government shutdown, DOI hasn’t responded to requests from Outside or other media groups asking for clarification. “You can’t even submit a FOIA request while the government is shut down, but somehow they got this rule out,” says Jayson O’Neill, deputy director of the Western Values Project, a Montana-based conservation nonprofit. O’Neill believes this is the boldest step any government agency has ever taken to limit people’s access to public documents. “With this proposed change, that check on how our government works and the public’s ability to see how decisions are made will go away.”

To justify the rule change, DOI argues that from 2016 to 2018, requests to the department under the FOIA increased 30 percent, and that requests to the Office of the Secretary have increased 210 percent from 2015 levels. (The DOI did not respond to a request from Outside asking for more years to compare these figures with.)

The entire problem, though, might be one of DOI’s own making. Nada Culver, senior counsel with the Wilderness Society, says the department forces groups and media organizations to file requests by not handing over the kind of information previous administrations have readily shared. “Now they’re using [the surge in requests] as an excuse to further restrict disclosure,” she says. “I think part of the irony here is that it’s going to result in more requests, and more litigation.”

Another big factor, of course, is that Zinke has faced unprecedented 18 federal investigations—a fact that was sure to spur a lot of FOIA filings. Many of them have been fruitful. After the administration shrunk Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments, requests led to the discovery that the DOI had tailored its reports to emphasize the benefits of extractive industries over tourism. Other requests revealed a possible conflict of interest violation that linked Zinke to a real estate deal with oil-services behemoth Halliburton. That news prompted the DOI’s internal watchdog to open an investigation. Now, there are rumors of a criminal inquiry.

Almost as concerning as the proposed rule changes is the person Zinke recently appointed to be the Interior’s Chief FOIA Officer. The job typically goes to a career employee, someone removed from politics. In November, though, Zinke quietly named former Koch brothers adviser Daniel Jorjani. One of the first groups to notice the switch, several weeks later, was the Center for Biological Diversity. “With a Koch crony in charge of records requests, the department will work in darkness,” the group’s government attorney, Meg Townsend, stated in a press release. “Public records that might shame Zinke or big polluters will be covered up.”

So far, that seems prescient. Jorjani authored the FOIA changes.

The fact of the matter is that if the changes goes through—lawsuits could hold them up—it will be impossible to measure the impact because we’ll never know what might have been uncovered if the DOI had continued to respect public requests for information. One can imagine how, under the new rules, journalists would never have learned about the potential Halliburton deal. And in that reality, maybe Zinke wouldn't have resigned. 

The public has until January 28 to comment on the change. But with just 189 comments received as of the morning of January 7, the DOI’s effort to push this out quietly seems to be working.

The Case for Varying Your Nutrition and Recovery

You don’t train the same way every day. Here’s why you should periodize everything else, too.

Here’s what a typical Monday looked like for Ron Clarke, the record-setting Australian distance runner who dominated international competition in the 1960s:

6:30 a.m.: 3 miles fast
1:00 p.m.: 6 miles fast
5:15 p.m.: 12 miles fast

As it happens, that’s what Tuesdays looked like too. And Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. That’s what his training weeks looked like in January, and May, and November. “His training from one season of the year to another varies little if at all, and any variation is unintentional,” noted Fred Wilt in his 1973 classic How They Train. “Each workout from day to day is remarkably similar.”

These days, almost no one trains like that. Within any given week, there are hard days and easy days, long and short, fast and slow. Within a season, there’s a progression from general fitness building to specific race preparation. Within a year, there’s an arc that aims to bring athletes to a peak for the most important competitions of the year. These deliberate variations in training are collectively referred to as “periodization,” and their effectiveness is—with rare exceptions—almost universally agreed upon. (Clarke, for what it’s worth, set 17 world records but never managed to win a race at the Olympics or Commonwealth Games.)

Lately, periodization has re-emerged as a hot topic in sports science—but as a much broader concept. If you train differently from day to day and month to month, shouldn’t the same be true of all the other things you do—like eating, resting, and mental preparation? That’s the question posed by a big new mega-paper in the International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, by group of scientists led by University of the Basque Country physiologist Iñigo Mujika.

The authors suggest an “integrated, multifactorial approach to periodization,” and make specific recommendations for periodizing four key areas: recovery, nutrition, psychology, and skill. Here’s an overview of what that means in five training phases: general preparation, specific preparation, taper, competition, and transition/off-season.

Recovery: The big debate in recovery (other than “does any of this stuff actually work?”) is whether it’s possible to have too much of a good thing. The inflammation and other bodily stress that follows a hard workout is the signal that tells your body to adapt and get stronger—so reducing it with an ice bath or a massage may be counterproductive.

This idea is still controversial, but some coaches and scientists now recommend limiting the use of recovery techniques during the general preparation phase, which for a marathoner would be the period of building up big mileage. Then, when you move to the specific preparation phase, where you’re hammering more race-pace workouts, you might throw in some ice baths and so on before those key workouts to help ensure you can nail the desired pace. And once you get to the taper phase in the final few weeks, use all the recovery you can get.

Nutrition: You can think about periodizing nutrition on several different timescales. The shortest is day-to-day variation: eat more on big training days and less on light training days. This might seem obvious, but it’s not what sports nutrition guidelines used to suggest.

At the other end of the spectrum, you might choose to periodize your nutrition over the course of a full year. A recent case study of Canadian Olympic runner Hilary Stellingwerff showed how her weight fluctuated almost sinusoidally from year to year. In the off-season, she would gain weight and then sustain a slightly higher-than-normal weight through the general preparation phase. Then, as specific training proceeded, she would gradually alter her diet to produce very subtle weight loss, then arrive at her target race weight shortly before the most important competitions of the year. There’s an uncomfortable tension in sports like running between the performance benefits of being light and the serious injury and health risks associated with being too light, so periodization aims to avoid spending too much time at race weight.

There are also other possible ways of periodizing your nutrition, such as doing some carbohydrate-restricted training during the general preparation period to boost fitness adaptations—the nutritional equivalent of wearing a weighted vest, essentially. For example, there have been a few studies of a “sleep low” protocol that involves doing a hard evening workout, not eating many carbs afterwards, then doing an easier workout before breakfast the next morning. This is an area of lively debate, but it’s not yet clear whether the benefits outweigh the challenges.

Psychology: This is a form of periodization I hadn’t thought much about, but the discussion has some interesting suggestions. In the general preparation period, you might focus of goal-setting, motivation, relaxation, and other big-picture challenges. During the specific preparation period, you shift to emotion management and increasing your sense of “self-efficacy,” for example by keeping a log of the improvements you’re making.

Once you start tapering, the emphasis changes again to work on focus, optimal arousal, and competition routines. When the competition period finally arrives, there are some obvious keys like confidence, but also some more neglected ideas like flexibility and tolerance of ambiguity—traits that come in handy when, as is almost always the case, a competition doesn’t go exactly as planned. Finally, in the off-season, you shift to self-care, self-evaluation, and new goal setting.

How exactly you’re supposed to achieve all these goals, and whether they’ll really aid your performance, admittedly remains a bit of an open question. But I think the idea of shifting the focus of whatever mental skills work you’re doing to match your training phase makes a lot of sense.

Skill: As a runner, for better or worse, I don’t tend to think a lot about motor skills. But they’re a big factor in most sports, and there’s plenty of research and debate on the best way to learn and optimize them. For skill-based sports, the big theme in the periodization paper is a move from high volume and variability to lower volume and more predictable practice conditions. Initially, you’re learning to hit the shot off-balance, with a hand in your face, with your off-dominant hand, and so on, and your failure rate may be pretty high. As you get closer to competition, you’re focused more on doing it right, and building your confidence by succeeding.

How you might put all these puzzle pieces together will depend a lot on your specific goals, sport, and circumstances. But the big message is relatively simple: if there’s something that you do identically every day, or every week, throughout the year, ask yourself whether it’s serving the same purpose six months before a race as it is six days before a race. If not, maybe it’s time to periodize.


My new book, Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance, with a foreword by Malcolm Gladwell, is now available. For more, join me on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the Sweat Science email newsletter.

Another Voyage for Madmen (And, This Time, One Woman)

The first Golden Globe Race, a solo, nonstop, around-the-world sailing event held in 1968, was a mixture of triumph, tragedy, and madness—all chronicled in a classic bestselling book and recent BBC movie. Fifty years later, 17 sailors are once again setting out for the most ambitious—and loneliest—regatta on the planet.

Facebook Icon

Twitter Icon

sms

email

On July 1, 17 skippers in 17 boats left the French port town of Les Sables d’Olonne and sailed west into the Bay of Biscay. Their destination? Les Sables d’Olonne, but from the other direction, a journey of about nine months and 30,000 miles. The boats are unremarkable. The sailors are a mixed bag: hotshot pro racers, ambitious yachties, ultracompetent old salts, young upstarts, dedicated adventurers, a hopeless dreamer or two—16 men and one woman representing 12 countries, all with a common intention. They’re racing around the world without stopping, without benefit of modern technology, and alone.

This is the second-ever Golden Globe Race. The original, which has been immortalized in several books, including Peter Nichols’ classic account, A Voyage for Madmen, as well as the documentary Deep Water and the recent Colin Firth film The Mercy, began in the summer of 1968 and, by its end, turned into an epic blend of historic triumph, human tragedy, and utter shitshow. Nine sailors started and one finished. One killed himself. This race marks the 50th anniversary of that event, and besides some allowances for safety, the rules limit the racers to technology available in 1968. Sextants, not GPS. Radio, not sat phones. Film cameras and Super 8s, not DSLRs and GoPros. No digital anything. No high-tech materials like Kevlar or carbon composite. No electric autopilot, desalinization, or refrigeration. No blog posts, no video chats, no selfies at sea.

Such restrictions might seem suspiciously like pedantic hipster nostalgia for all things analog, but the throwback nature of the race is an earnest attempt to reclaim radical simplicity in a world addicted to interconnectedness. Just think—no email, no texts, no news alerts for the better part of a year. But no family or friends, either. No human touch. Just one person, one boat, one planet. This is a race about intangibles. The skippers will sail a very long way to see pretty much only a disc of water and a dome of sky, their progress marked by changing angles in the sextant mirrors, lines drawn on charts. Whoever wins won’t even win money—more on that later—but will be symbolically awarded a perpetual trophy.

Not all will finish. If half the fleet succeeds, everyone will be pleasantly surprised. Following the fastest route, as the skippers are obliged to do, means sailing down the Atlantic, turning east around the bottom of Africa, passing below Australia and New Zealand, rounding Cape Horn, and crossing back up the Atlantic. This, in turn, means spending something like four or five months in isolated latitudes known as the Roaring Forties and Furious Fifties, in the ring of water around Antarctica that sailors speak of, with caution and respect, as the Southern Ocean. Strong and reliable westerly winds, unimpeded by land, make for fast sailing but also build into severe gales and massive seas that will break anything on a boat that can be broken and wear on the physical and mental fortitude of any sailor. Boats will fail. Injuries will happen. People will decide they’ve had enough. It’s a war of attrition.

The obvious question is why. Why choose to sail alone in a small boat through the world’s most furious seas, far from comfort or help, guided by the stars? Why attempt such a journey knowing full well that at times you will be horribly lonely, at others frustrated beyond measure, sometimes bored, sometimes afraid, that death by drowning out in the middle of big blue will be a constant possibility?

If you have to ask, you’ll never really understand the answer. In a way, there is no answer.


Les Sables d’Olonne has a broad, curving beach edged by a well-strolled, almost supernaturally shadeless embankment and presided over by a long row of blocky apartment buildings interspersed with elegant Belle Époque villas. It’s a sailing town with a steady breeze, best known as the start and finish of the Vendée Globe, an extravagantly high-tech singlehanded circumnavigation race that happens every four years. Faded posters from the 2016 iteration still hang in windows.

For the second half of June, the Golden Globe boats were tied up at a floating dock, les pontons, in Les Sables d’Olonne’s densely occupied marina for final preparations and inspections. Flags flapped in their rigging. A steady stream of well-wishers, gawkers, and autograph seekers walked up and down the row of boats, chatting in French to the skippers, even those who spoke no French. The French are big sailing fans, and many clustered around the boat of Jean-Luc van den Heede, the oldest racer, a 73-year-old French sailing hero with five solo circumnavigations already under his belt, including two Vendée Globes. Nearby was Susie Goodall’s red-hulled sloop of the same design, a Rustler 36 called Starlight. Goodall, at 28, is the youngest skipper and the only woman. Kevin Farebrother, a firefighter from Perth, Australia, christened his boat Sagarmantha, the Nepalese name for Mount Everest, which he has summited three times.

(PPL Photo Agency)

Mark Slats, a strapping Dutchman, had two gigantic oars on the deck of his boat, which he planned on using to row through calms. (Dread of calms and a strong preference for storms was universal among the sailors. Calms are boring and leave you too much time to think.) Slats thought he could row for about ten hours a day, getting maybe 2.5 knots. This past December, he rowed solo across the Atlantic in 30 days, 7 hours, and 49 minutes, smashing the world record.

Aside from the sponsor logos on hulls and sails, the boats were decidedly basic—cruisers you’d see in any marina. Race rules required them to be single-hulled, mass-produced, designed before 1988, and between 32 and 36 feet in overall length. Farther down the dock, their masts towering over the rest, were a handful of IMOCA 60s, the boats used in the Vendée Globe. Recent designs resemble 60-foot-long squared-off Star Trek insignias and are capable of levitating above the water on retractable foils, reaching speeds over 30 knots. If they are the monohull equivalent of Formula One race cars, then the Golden Globe boats are modestly tricked-out camper vans. Get six knots out of one and you feel pretty good. The Vendée Globe record is 74 days. Golden Globe sailors are planning for 300, even if the speediest hope to shave more than a month off that. But modesty is part of the point.

“All the other races are incredibly expensive,” said Golden Globe race director Don McIntyre. “They’re great to watch, but it’s now got exclusive, very exclusive, and it’s going more so that way.” A competitive Vendée Globe campaign costs millions of dollars, but the Golden Globe requires only a fraction of that. According to McIntyre, $100,000 would be enough to get in the race, and at the end you’d still own your boat, which, he pointed out, you could live in. Some might have to. While a minority of the sailors were comfortably covered by sponsors or personal wealth, five sold or mortgaged their houses to fund their circumnavigations. Others, lacking houses to sell, have had to hustle hard.

“I had no money and no boat,” said 31-year-old Irishman Gregor McGuckin. “I did an overseas in the Caribbean to help get a bit of capital to buy a boat, or at least help trick banks into thinking I had a steady income so they’d give me a loan to buy a boat.” Just a month out from the start, McGuckin was still relying mostly on blind faith and dogged determination when, after much pavement pounding, he secured a sponsorship. But costs still loom for when he is away—payments on the boat loan, for example, even if the repo man wouldn’t have an easy time tracking him down. Taking advantage of a technological recourse unavailable to the 1968 skippers, he has set up a GoFundMe.

As of the start, the race itself was also short on funds. The original plan was for a purse of 75,000 euros (around $87,000), to be split among the four fastest circumnavigators, but without a major sponsor, pride and a sense of accomplishment would have to suffice. (Banners on each of the boats, beneath the sailors’ names, had a blue place-holding rectangle that read simply “Sponsor?”) According to McIntyre, only 35,000 euros in sponsorship funds had come through, and while the local government of Les Sables d’Olonne had contributed the cost of the race village and each entrant had put in a start fee of just over $10,000, he said he’d personally invested nearly three-quarters of a million dollars.

McIntyre, an Australian, has made a colorful career for himself seeking out and facilitating adventure. In the 1980s, he started marine equipment importing and yacht-building businesses to fund his own participation in the BOC Challenge, a solo circumnavigation race with stops. McIntyre was second in his class in 1990. After that, he started running and guiding tourist trips to Antarctica; currently, he and his partner have a long-term lease on an island in Tonga, where they run whale swimming trips. McIntyre’s initial concept for the Golden Globe reboot, which first occurred to him in 1995, had been simpler: He would sail around himself for the 30th anniversary. At the time, he was spending a year in an 8×12-foot hut on Antarctica with his then wife. “I was sitting there in the box in the middle of winter thinking, what’s next, what’s next?” McIntyre said. He made plans and designed a boat, but life got in the way. He missed the 40th anniversary as well when he chose instead to recreate Captain Bligh’s 3,600-mile Pacific journey in a 24-foot open boat. These things happen.

“Finally,” McIntyre said, “we were in Tonga, treasure hunting—this is in 2014, long story—and I thought, jeepers, four years to the anniversary.” The timing had come right. Then he thought, Why not make it a race?


In 1968, no one had ever sailed around the world alone and without stopping. This may not seem like a problem, but to rivalrous sailors from France and the UK, it was. People had sailed around the world singlehanded, but they’d always come ashore at some point for repairs or supplies or to have a good meal and a chat. The first solo circumnavigator was Joshua Slocum, a former clipper captain from Nova Scotia who, rendered professionally obsolete by the rise of the steam engine, set off eastward from Boston in 1895 in a 37-foot oyster sloop and returned three years later. He made many stops, navigating with spooky accuracy despite relying on a rudimentary combination of lunar sights, dead reckoning, and an old tin clock instead of a proper chronometer.

Eighteen others had followed suit by 1967, when an Englishman named Francis Chichester became first to sail around with only one stop. What was left to do but cut out the stop?

The Sunday Times, a weekly newspaper in the UK, hit on the idea of offering a trophy, the Golden Globe, to the first sailor to complete the feat and a cash prize of £5,000 for the fastest circumnavigation. No official entry was required, nor was any kind of qualifying experience. Skippers could sail whatever kind of boat they wanted, no matter how unsuitable. The only nod to safety was the paper’s stipulation that, to be eligible, sailors had to leave between June 1 and October 31, 1968. Departing earlier or later would mean near-suicidal conditions in the Southern Ocean. In the end, the field was made up of six Brits, two Frenchmen, and one Italian.

(Maverick Sport/GGR/PPL; Christophe Favreau/Matmut/PPL)

In early February, four were left. Carozzo, the Italian, had made it only as far as Portugal before stomach ulcers forced him to retire. Others dropped out due to boat damage or the realization that life would be much more pleasant elsewhere. Who was left? In the lead, 29-year-old Robin Knox-Johnston, a straitlaced merchant marine officer who considered hegemony over the sea a British birthright, was on the homestretch, crossing back up the Atlantic in his 32-foot teak ketch, Suhaili. He had left earlier than anyone else remaining, in mid-June, and was likely to be the first back but very unlikely to be the fastest. The only sailor with a chance at overtaking him was the famous French sailor and nautical memoirist Bernard Moitessier, who was sailing very fast in 39-foot steel ketch named Joshua (for Slocum). Moitessier had just rounded Cape Horn. British naval lieutenant Nigel Tetley was in third, having just passed New Zealand in his increasingly beat-up 40-foot trimaran named Victress. Tetley would not catch Knox-Johnston, but if he continued as he had been, he would be faster.

Then there was Donald Crowhurst, the dark horse, whose exact whereabouts were unknown.


In Les Sables this June, skippers and support teams came and went to their boats like bees to a favorite flower. They hauled out and put away sail bags and boxes of hardware and giant plastic bins of canned and dehydrated food, hung off sterns to tinker with the self-steering gear, politely signed autographs when visitors couldn’t be dodged, went up masts, drilled and cranked and coiled and generally enacted sustained, miscellaneous marine busyness.

The busiest boat was Italian Francesco Cappelletti’s, because it was nowhere near ready to sail. While the other skippers had all raced to Les Sables by sea from Falmouth in the UK, Cappelletti, running far behind schedule, had been forced to ship his yellow ketch overland from the south of France. At Les Sables, he’d put it in the water and stepped the masts, but with days to go, countless tasks remained undone, including major ones like wiring and installing pumps and radio. Before he could leave, he’d need to pass an involved safety inspection and spend three days at sea doing 300 additional qualifying miles, and things were not looking good for Cappelletti. His one bittersweet ray of hope was that racers who didn’t make the July 1 start were permitted to start as late as July 7. In fact, in the 1968 race, the only Italian competitor, Alex Carozzo, faced with a similar situation, had repaired to a mooring after the start deadline passed for another week of preparation before setting out.

Russian Igor Zaretskiy’s ketch, Esmerelda, was another hive of activity, due not to desperation but an abundance of helpers: a large and unsmiling crew of men in Yacht Russia T-shirts and shin-length denim shorts who, when Igor went out for a test sail, followed unsmilingly behind in a rigid-inflatable boat, flying the Russian flag. Among Zaretskiy’s supplies were 600 packs of cigarettes—a disincentive against quitting the race, because if he put into port abroad, he’d have to pay duty on them.

Other boats were oases of tranquility. Sailors knew to casually swing by Lazy Otter around lunchtime, when Turkish-born British skipper Ertan Beskardes and his wife, Arzu, purveyors of military regalia in their onshore lives, would inevitably insist they stay for lunch. Abhilash Tomy, a pilot in the Indian navy who’d completed a previous solo nonstop circumnavigation in 2013, sometimes slept the morning away, rolling in midafternoon to do some languid boat tinkering. “It’s just a circumnavigation,” Tomy said. “I don’t know why everyone’s making such a big deal out of it.”


As far as anyone back in Britain knew, in February 1969, Donald Crowhurst was more than a thousand miles east of Cape Town, in the southern Indian Ocean, sailing at incredible speed. They thought this because he had been radioing home false daily mileages and deliberately vague positions, and his overzealous, highly credulous publicist had been spreading and embellishing his story. In actuality, Crowhurst was dawdling off the coast of South America. An inexperienced sailor and struggling electronics entrepreneur with an unfortunate knack for convincing others to believe in his self-delusions, Crowhurst had finagled the sponsorship to build a 41-foot trimaran, Teignmouth Electron, in exchange for a contractual promise that if he didn’t finish the race, he would repay the cost. In effect, Crowhurst would be ruined, and he had a wife and four children to support.

(PPL)

At the time of the first Golden Globe race, multihulls were in their infancy. They were known to be fast, but many doubted their capacity to endure heavy seas. One major problem was that when a multihull capsizes, its submerged mast and sails become a keel, and it does not right itself. Teignmouth Electron, even setting aside its questionable basic design, especially had no business going anywhere near the Southern Ocean. It was leaky and rattletrap. Its decks were sealed only with paint, not fiberglass, and the great invention Crowhurst had talked up to sell his voyage—an automatically triggered self-righting buoyancy bag at the top of the mast—existed only as bunches of wire running through the trimaran’s cabin, attached to nothing.

Within a few weeks of leaving port, his boat already falling apart with alarming speed, Crowhurst understood that proceeding with his planned journey would mean almost certain death. In December, ensnared by pride and shame, he had begun keeping a second logbook, documenting a false journey. He calculated navigational sights for positions thousands of miles from where he actually was (not an easy bit of math) and cobbled together guesses at distant weather from radio reports. In January, feigning radio trouble, he had cut himself off from the outside world. Crowhurst planned to loiter in the South Atlantic until the other homebound racers passed him, at which point he could fall in line behind them and finish respectably. Hopefully no one would look too closely at the logbook of the third- or fourth-place sailor.

In mid-April, Crowhurst reestablished radio contact, claimed to be approaching Cape Horn, and asked for news of the other racers. Knox-Johnston was nearly home, he learned, and Tetley was in the Atlantic, about two weeks ahead of Crowhurst. Bernard Moitessier, always something of a mystic and concerned about the corrupting effects of competition and fame, had decided to abandon the race and continue on toward Tahiti in pure communion with the sea. In a message he slingshotted onto the deck of a passing tanker near Cape Town, Moitessier informed the Sunday Times, “I am continuing non-stop towards the Pacific Islands because I am happy at sea, and perhaps also to save my soul.”

On April 22, Knox-Johnston arrived back in Falmouth, an immediate hero and celebrity. On May 20, only a thousand miles from home, Nigel Tetley’s trimaran, badly weakened by months at sea, finally fell apart and sank. When he was informed by cable of the sinking (and Tetley’s subsequent rescue), Crowhurst understood, inescapably, that if he continued on, he would be laying claim to the fastest time around and subjecting his account of the journey to impossible scrutiny. There was no way his deception would not be exposed.

His progress slowed. His track became aimless. Early in June, his radio failed, and Crowhurst spent two weeks working obsessively to repair it while the Teignmouth Electron drifted through the doldrums. Once the radio was repaired, Crowhurst tapped out a flurry of messages to his wife and publicist. After that, becalmed in the Sargasso Sea, he opened his logbook and spent eight days writing down incoherent, exclamation point–studded ramblings about Einstein and mathematics and intelligence and morality, working himself up to the less-than-realistic conclusion that “[m]athematicians and engineers used to the techniques of system analysis will skim through my complete work in less than an hour. At the end of that time problems that have beset humanity for thousands of years will have been solved for them.”

On July 1, reaching the end of the logbook, he stopped mid-sentence and wrote no more. Nine days later, Teignmouth Electron was found adrift in the middle of the Atlantic. Crowhurst was gone, and so was the ship’s chronometer. Presumably he’d jumped overboard, leaving behind a confession in the form of the two logbooks.


A few nights before the start of the 2018 Golden Globe, in the tented bar in the Les Sables race village, Jean-Luc van den Heede’s band was playing. Couples waltzed around whatever floor space they could find while the septuagenarian sailor happily crooned away, pausing occasionally to banter in French. Late in his first set, van den Heede invited up a special guest. Robin Knox-Johnston climbed onstage, bearing two beers. He is now 79, Sir Robin, elder statesman of singlehanded sailing with three more circumnavigations under his belt, including another solo voyage in 2007. In 2016, he finished restoring Suhaili its original low-key, slightly tubby glory, and he’d sailed it across from Falmouth with the Golden Globe fleet. Knox-Johnson downed his beer and gave the other to van den Heede. The two men launched into a baritone duet of “Molly Malone.” “Cockles and mussels,” they sang. “Alive, alive, oh.” The crowd went wild.

Bernard Moitessier died in 1994, but Joshua, also restored, was in Les Sables, docked beside Suhaili. (Victress, of course, was at the bottom of the Atlantic, and in a sad and puzzling epilogue, Nigel Tetley had been found hanging from a tree in 1972.) Francis Chichester’s yacht Gypsy Moth IV was also at les pontons. Alex Carozzo, the Italian who’d been undone by ulcers, put in an appearance. Jesse Martin and Jessica Watson were around, both Australians who’d completed solo nonstops as teenagers (Watson with significant assistance from Don McIntyre), and there was a prevailing atmosphere of fellowship among the circumnavigators, both veteran and hopeful, a sense of being at a rare gathering of usually solitary creatures.

(Antoine Cousot/GGR/PPL)

“The thing about singlehanded sailors,” said Mark Sinclair, a 59-year-old Australian skipper known to all as Captain Coconut, after his orange Lello 34, Coconut, “is by nature they don’t conform. They don’t obey rules. They do their own thing. So having an event for singlehanded sailors is like an oxymoron. It’s impossible.”

Or certainly not easy. The competitors complained about all the rules. (The notice of race—the official regulations—was more than 60 pages long and involved the purchase of many expensive bits of safety equipment, including satellite phones they weren’t allowed to use to call anyone except race officials for required check-ins.) The race organizers complained about the competitors complaining. There was some whispering about whether anyone might smuggle aboard a GPS. Not everyone was comfortable with the sextant yet. The rules—those rules again!—mandated that the racers pass a specific mark in the Canary Islands, but not everyone was confident about finding it.

“The reality is,” said Don McIntyre, “the only way you will finish this is if you have a burning passion to finish it. It’s all in the brain. You can have the best boat and the best gear, but if you’re not there for the right reasons, you’ll find a reason to retire.”

But these reasons, the right reasons, resist definition. All the sailors seemed to have decided more or less instantaneously to enter the race as soon as they heard about it, as though the idea had broken a pane of glass inside them, releasing an implacable spirit. They described obsession, sleeplessness, a rush to lock down a spot in the lineup without knowing how they were possibly going to get the money together. But as far as why, they couldn’t do much better than offer platitudes about the challenge or say, well, this is just the kind of thing I do, this is who I am. Fundamentally, the desire to be in the race was just that, a desire, as instinctive and unpredictable and inarticulable as lust.

Minnesotan Nabil Amra, who is competing under the Palestinian flag and is one of the more novice sailors, was something of an exception. When he first heard of the event, he wasn’t initially seized by a personal mania. First he suggested to Mahfouz Kabariti, an activist and president of the Palestine Surfing and Sailing Federation, that a Palestinian enter. Kabariti told him Palestinians are prohibited from competing internationally. “Maybe it was my Midwestern sense of fair play, but that burned me up,” Amra said. “So I thought I would do it. I had an interest in cruising, not necessarily in sailing around the world without seeing anything. But sometimes we make a sacrifice for a greater good.”

He added, “Sometimes anger can be a powerful motivator if you harness it.”

Will a lofty sense of the greater good be enough when you’ve been cold and wet for four months in the Southern Ocean? No one can predict what will happen out there. There’s a randomness to how environment and boat and human will chafe and collide, an unpredictability to internal and external breaking points. At any moment, anyone might hit a submerged shipping container and sink. And there is the uncertain capacity of the self to cope with existence as the solitary center of a disc of empty water. You can’t know how you’ll manage until you try. Some find they can’t get enough.

Abhilash Tomy couldn’t wait to leave Les Sables. He was sailing a newly built replica of Suhaili that had been constructed, like the original, in India. “I know what the mind is going to be like,” he said. “I know what the body’s going to feel. And you just go through it.” What does the mind feel like? “Empty. Blank. Happy. In control. Without emotions.” And the body? “Shit.”

On his previous circumnavigation, Tomy said, “I became very clairvoyant. I could see far into the future, far into the past.” What did he see? “Many, many things. I saw everything.”

Tomy said he would come back completely wiped clean, without memory or guilt or morality or cravings. “Completely deconstructed,” he said. For him, that was what was critical. A self so distilled it became a kind of nothingness. That was what he was looking for.


On July 5, four days after the start, Francesco Cappelletti officially withdrew from the race, acknowledging that he would not be able to meet the safety requirements in time for the July 7 deadline. He still planned to sail around the world, but, no longer bound by the race rules, he would be using GPS, not the stars.

Later the same day, Ertan Beskardes headed for port in northern Spain. In a Facebook post announcing his withdrawal from the race, Beskardes wrote, “After few days, not talking to my family regularly to share the daily experiences has sadly taken the joy and happiness from this experience. The feeling gradually felt worse until nothing else mattered except to talk to them.”

He had not been afraid of loneliness, but it got him anyway.

Before that, though, before the race was quite a reality, the morning of the start was hot and sunny with only a breath of breeze. One by one, the skippers steered out of the marina and through a channel to the open sea, where they raised their sails. A hundred or so boats had gathered to send them off. There were dozens of recreational yachts, a tall ship, a couple IMOCA 60s. There were race officials and support teams in rigid inflatable boats. A helicopter darted and hovered among the masts. “We love you!” Beskardes’ family shouted to him as they motored past. He blew a kiss.

At noon, the boats gathered behind an imaginary line in the sea between Suhaili and Joshua, both under sail. A cannon fired, and they passed between the two old yachts, racing toward the horizon at a sedate pace. Eventually, all the other boats turned back, and they were alone.

4 Rules to Becoming a Bike-Riding Mindfulness Guru

Adjust your mindset and your bike will follow

Cycling is full of contradictions. On one hand, it’s a blissful escape; by riding a bicycle, you can literally pedal yourself into a state of better mental health. On the other, it can be deadly, and unless you’re a first responder or a combat soldier, your rides are pretty much the only times you’re forced to confront the very real possibility of your imminent demise during the normal course of your day.*

Sure, statistically there are a lot of activities that are way riskier than cycling, but the fact remains that you can totally die out there.

So what’s the best way to cope with this? Ride anyway and try not to think about it? Forget the whole enterprise and declare, “Fuck it, I’m leasing a Hyundai”?

Hardly. I believe that there is a middle way, and that you can cultivate a cycling attitude that will keep you both happy and alive. In order to achieve this balance, it can be helpful to meditate on the following as you ride. 

Start Every Ride with a Goal

No, I don’t mean a goal like beating your best time to work or crushing that Strava KOM. I mean start with a noble goal, like having a good ride—and by “good,” I mean one that’s completely free from altercations and injury, and that leaves you happier than you were when you started it. Take a moment to visualize your entire ride going smoothly from beginning to end. Then imagine pouring this optimism into some kind of vessel, placing it into a cupholder on your handlebars, and getting through the entire ride without spilling a drop. While you certainly can’t control every aspect of your ride, you do have full control your own actions, and riding mindfully will help make you make good choices and turn your idealized ride into reality.

Then, when finished with the ride, celebrate with a ceremony in which you drink your optimism in the form of an actual alcoholic beverage. (Repeat as necessary.)

Always Think About How You Could Die

Common wisdom would have you believe that in order to stay in the zone, it’s best not to overthink things—you know, “Don’t look down” and all that. This may be good advice if you’re carrying a tray of drinks or going for that bowling high score, but we're talking about riding a bike and even with the advent of bike lanes, the truth of the matter is that most of the streets you’re riding are basically designed to kill you. (Well, technically they’re designed for cars, but that’s pretty much the same thing.) So ride that way! Think about it: If there was a bounty on your head, would you walk around casually like nothing was wrong? No you would not. You’d dye your hair, stick on a fake mustache, and expect assassins to leap out of every nook and cranny.

Constantly thinking about death would seem to run counter to the whole optimism thing, but in fact it’s the best way to reconcile ourselves with our own mortality, which is the basis for everything from celebrating Halloween to listening to Slayer. On the bike, knowing death is always there ready to pounce reminds me to never take my own safety for granted; it compels me to check over my shoulder, reposition myself on the roadway, or check my speed as necessary. Does it create fear and keep me off the bike? No, nothing keeps me off the bike. But imagining myself not making it through an intersection alive does make me think twice about trying to catch the light that’s about to change.

Flow Like Water

Remember the old “I’m rubber, you’re glue” chant you’d recite when someone called you a name? Well, when someone’s bullying you on the bike, you don’t want to be rubber or glue. Glue is sticky and rubber is non-wicking and uncomfortable. What you want to be is water, and that’s easy on a bike: no other road user can move as fluidly as you can. Use this to your advantage. When an obstacle enters your path, don’t get mad, get around it. Yes, those drivers in the bike lane deserves at least a few choice words and perhaps some broken side-view mirrors. However, if they were reasonable people, they wouldn’t be sitting in the bike lane in the first place. They’re not going to listen to you, so don’t bother. Exhale, go around as safely as you can (which you will because you’ve already imagined the scenario in which you die), and instead channel your energy into putting pressure on your city officials later.

Same goes for pedestrians who step into your path: it’s annoying, but as long as you’re attentive, riding sensibly, and focused on transporting your vessel of optimism you should have no trouble safely avoiding them. Most importantly, don’t heap the same derision onto them that motorists do onto you. They’re even more vulnerable than you are.

Water is power. Use yours wisely.

Know Your Enemy

Lest any of the above give you the wrong idea, when it comes to the streets, we’re not all equal stakeholders who must learn to live together in peace and harmony. Make no mistake: Drivers are your enemy. But when your enemy is legion, has seized control of the infrastructure, and has law enforcement on its side, is it really wise to attack them? Of course not. Instead, find inspiration in the fact that you’re vastly more nimble and adaptable than they are. Use their plodding and lumbering to your advantage. They’re the dinosaurs, destined for extinction, while you’re the small and nimble mammal flourishing right under their moribund noses.

The writing is on the wall for the automobile in the form of endless traffic jams and diminishing interest in car ownership. Evolutionarily speaking, that sedan with the AAA bumper sticker is no match for your bike. So why waste time engaging in conflict when the war is already won?  

*Well, you also risk imminent death whenever you travel by motor vehicle, but as a society we’ve learned how not to confront that.


Illustrations by Taj Mihelich

Vision Matters More Than Sight in 'The Weight of Water'

>

Since biblical times, it has been said that the eyes are a window to the soul. But human history is filled with false assumptions.

The Weight of Water, which premiered in early November at the Banff Mountain Film and Book Festival and won the Grand Prize for film, opens with sublime images of a magnificent natural world, where shadows and light sweep across walls rising from a canyon carved by the Colorado River eons ago. The water continues its course, and soon we see a person in a kayak, riding the tumbling rapids. His blank eyes stare outward. Something looks off. His face reacts with slight delays, out of sync with the waves hitting his tiny boat.

“I’ve climbed Mount Everest, so why am I so fucking scared?” we later hear Erik Weihenmayer asking himself. Given that he is blind, it strikes me as a fairly easy question to answer.

Emmy Award–winning director Michael Brown’s new documentary takes us into Weihenmayer’s journey as he paddles, in a solo kayak, the 277 miles of the Grand Canyon. Weihenmayer is joined by Lonnie Bedwell, who is also blind, and a crew of river guides and camera operators. Weihenmayer, now 50, didn’t start kayaking until he was nearly 40. The technical crux looms large in the film—the boat-flipping rapids of the notorious Lava Falls, a chaotic stretch with holes that can swallow kayaks and drown people.

Life probably would have been easier for Weihenmayer if he were born blind. In a heartbreaking early segment of the film, we learn that young Weihenmayer lost his eyesight slowly, the result of a rare condition called retinoschisis, in which one’s retinas gradually split apart. His mother, Ellen,was ferocious in advocating for her son, going into schools and demanding that he be taught alongside the other kids. Weihenmayer has described her asthe dustpan that swept him up when he was broken. When he was 13, as the remnants of his eyesight were abandoning him, his mother was killed in a car accident, leaving him completely shattered. Soon after, he went totally blind. He describes blindness initially as a prison. His father, Ed, a former U.S. Marine, still has a crew cut and sits bolt upright, using direct language to describe that time in his son’s life. Ed even recites an old saying he had drilled into the boy, imploring him to never quit. But Ed’s voice cracks and his eyes grow damp when he says that he’s never figured out how, at that age, his son wasn’t destroyed by losing both his mother and his eyesight.

In high school, Weihenmayer discovered rock climbing, a slow and methodical activity where his hands and feet provided him a tactile map of his environment. Soon his internal prison opened into a new world. “This is the opposite of what I thought blindness would be like,” he says. He’s climbed the Seven Summits, the Nose on Yosemite’s El Capitan, the 2,300-foot ice route Losar in Nepal, and completed the Leadville 100 bicycle race. 

And still, blindness presents very real obstacles—no matter our feel-good cliché of barriers existing only in the mind.

“I hate it when people tell me anything is possible,” he says.

We see him at homewith his family, preparing for the Grand Canyon trip. He can’t seem to sit still. His teenage daughter helps him sort gear. He tries to not bump into things. He’s good-natured when told that he put his shirt on inside-out.

On the river he bumps into thunderous rapids as his friend and river guide, Harlan Taney, shouts on-the-fly instructions via wireless headset: “Left, hard right, hold that line, hold that line, charge charge charge!” Between Taney’s directions and the ambient soundscape, such as reverberations from crashing waves and echoes off the walls, in his mind Weihenmayer develops a complex mapping system of the rapids and their deadly traps.

No wonder he’s scared.

Throughout the film it becomes apparent that Weihenmayer shares insecurities familiar to most humans, regardless of his superhero list of accomplishments. His inability to see his objective is inconsequential; rather, what matters is the freedom that comes from finding self-control amid the darkness of the world. Like anyone, he grapples with failure, worry, and ego, and the difficulty of being present at critical times, yet something deeper pushes him forward, as if he is incapable of quitting. He says that he wants to be the bravery that others see in him.

We gain glimpses of an inner world perhaps similar to our own, under circumstances incomprehensibly different. How fascinating that a theater full of people watched breathtaking scenes from the life of a man unable to see any of it himself, and who cannot see us watching him. Although I have always been drawn to the natural world, I couldn’t help but wonder what this says about the limitations of the sighted, who so often need to venture afar to explore the depth that lies within. 

Erik Weihenmayer’s eyes serve as a naked and beautiful metaphor for the vast potential of the human experience. And while he is correct about some barriers being real, in The Weight of Water, Brown and Weihenmayer also show us that vision is more powerful than sight.

The Secret Geniuses Behind Your Favorite Gear

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

Let’s just say Patagonia’s current Black Hole 45-liter duffel is your favorite piece of luggage. It packs up into its own pocket, for one thing. It’s also lightweight but burly, waterproof but not a plastic bag. It can be carried as a duffel when you’re toting it to the car and as a backpack when you’re walking to festival camping. When you fly, it’s your carry-on. Something about this inanimate object spoke to you in the gear shop. And ever since, it’s proven itself indispensable. 

In every way, the Black Hole duffel screams Patagonia, what with its long-lasting design and sustainable messaging. But here’s the thing—it’s not purely a Patagonia product. Back in 2014, the environmentally conscious folks at Yvon Chouinard’s brand were struggling with something they didn’t like about an earlier iteration of the pack: wasteful packaging. If you were to buy the duffel at a Patagonia store back then, it would have come in a large plastic bag, which was anathema to the green ethos of the brand. So since Patagonia likes to focus its internal efforts on designing sustainable and rugged gear, not packaging, it asked a handful of independent design firms to pitch some ideas. Patagonia didn’t want any plastic packaging; that was about it for the directions.

A Seattle-area design shop called Ideology took an ambitious approach to the rather narrow assignment. As it sees it, packaging is part of the product, and the product is ultimately an experience. What if, the team asked Patagonia, the new Black Hole rolled up into its own pocket, and that pouch became the packaging? No plastic wrap, no recycled cardboard. Hell, no hangtags. Zero waste. Patagonia loved the idea—so much, in fact, that it asked Ideology to partner on a complete redesign of the duffel.

Together they blew up the old Black Hole, sourced new fabrics, and reconfigured the straps. Every move made the Black Hole better. It’s still a stupid-simple gear hauler, but Patagonia looked to Ideology thinking it’d get a nifty cardboard sleeve, and instead the collaboration kicked in and the company ended up with an entirely new duffel. This, and not designing products from the ground up in a vacuum, is how larger projects often come about for independent design shops, which primarily function as problems-solvers, making existing gear better.

The Black Hole was a crushing success, and today items that stuff into their own pockets is a theme with Patagonia. And yet almost nobody has heard of Ideology—or the scores of independent product-design shops like it worldwide that help create the gear you love. Nobody keeps track of exactly how much design work is contributed to by indie shops, but Ideology’s head of strategy Aaron Ambuske would guess that number is around 10 to 15 percent of truly new products.


Indie product design is inherently a dark field. That’s in part because most big outdoor companies have in-house product-design staffs, too. And it behooves the brand to have you, Mr. and Ms. Gear Lover, believe that every bit of innovation is birthed there. This makes it difficult for the indie shops to market what they do. The shops that I talked with only put about 10 percent of their projects on their websites. Because of that, new business typically comes from existing relationships and word of mouth. This makes sense. Beyond the sensitivities of the nondisclosure agreements indie firms sign when they take on work, shouting from the rooftops that they are the true creators of a successful product isn’t going to please the company whose logo is stamped on the thing. It’s also insincere. “If any independent product designers tell you that they built the whole project, I’d say they were lying,” says Zac West, creative lead at Ideology. “From inception to the factory, it’s a collaboration.”

Maybe, like Yeti Coolers, you’ve released a great series of rotomolded plastic models and you need to tap experts in the fabric world for a new soft-tote line. Or perhaps it’s time to update the suspension on your mountain-bike company’s long-travel 29er. Maybe you’re a shark-tank inventor with Kickstarter cash but no clue how to take the doohickey to fruition. That’s where independent product-design shops come in. Matt Powell, a senior industry adviser with the NPD Group, sees more cross-pollination and a willingness to tap indie design shops in the outdoor world, where many brands already share technology and products elements like, for example, a Polartec waterproof-breathable membrane or a Vibram sole. “In the outdoor industry, as opposed to the athletic industry, the brands tend to share technologies, and that makes them more likely to outsource to a shop,” he says. “Part of it has to do with scale. There are so many small brands in the outdoor space, and it’s easier for them to outsource some R&D. It gives them access to new ideas without huge capital investments.” 

To be clear, not every outdoor manufacturer hires out. Many lean on their internal teams. That can be the perfect system for a ski company, which has deep institutional knowledge, owns the factory, and knows every material supplier in the business on a first-name basis. The need for external help often comes into play when brands want to expand into new product lines or break from tradition or when they recognize their weaknesses. The same company that makes Rossignol and Dynastar skis also makes Lange boots. It knows exactly how to mold a boot that fits and performs well, but it admittedly seeks out help for aesthetics. The nonretail boots that elite skiers race on are kind of ugly and blocky. Consumer boots need a sculpted look.

“On the ski side of the business, outside of graphics, we do everything in-house,” says Lange’s global brand director, Thor Verdunk. “But for boots, we tap into smaller firms. A little design group in Paris makes the lines line up. They come to us and say, ‘Hey, here’s a new concept.’” Verdunk explains that  Rossignol has never received a finished product from a design firm, but a collaboration produced the gridded look of the Rossignol Alltrack LT boot. “Not only did it look cool, but the design let us shave weight and fine-tune the stiffness,” he says. "It’s a coworking process.”


Unlike vertically aligned manufacturers, shops like Ideology employ people with diverse backgrounds. Maybe the founders came from the fabric world, but then as they ramped up, they hired 3-D modeling experts, a carbon-fiber savant, and a seasoned prototyper. The biggest design shops in the global outdoor space spend most of their time and resources working on far more mainstream projects. Target Design, a German firm that’s worked on Dynafit and Marker ski bindings, also added elements to the Porsche Boxster and a BMW ergonomic study. Claudio Franco design, in Italy, works on Atomic ski boots, Pinarello bikes, and incredibly ornate and delicate artistic light fixtures. Which is to say: they’ve got range. And by tapping into that range, a narrowly focused camp-stove or tent or headlamp manufacturer is connecting to materials and techniques beyond their workaday ken.

Consider the example of MSR, which turned to Ideology as it ramped up a redesign of its line of snow tools—avalanche shovels, anchors, snow saws, and the like. One product, a simple snow anchor known as a fluke (because it’s the size and shape of a small flounder), lent itself to a blend of materials. It’s just an aluminum frame with trampoline decking made from urethane-coated nylon. MSR knew aluminum. Ideology knew urethane-coated nylon. Now, thanks to the collaboration, it’s the lightest fluke on the market.

Sometimes, says Ambuske, a brand wants the design shop to stay surgically targeted on a goal and only check in once it has something to show. Other times a collaboration involves frequent Skype calls and constant back-and-forth. Regardless of the nature of the relationship between an outdoor company and a design firm, inspiration for new ideas can come from unexpected sources. Take the recent experience of Utah’s Rocketship, an indie design shop at the top of its game that was tasked with figuring out how to house a two-burner alcohol-burning stove (by whom, they can’t say). The finished product could potentially avert hundreds of C02-poisoning deaths a year in developing nations, but for it to succeed, it had to function differently than your mom and dad’s old box stove. Easy-to-replace parts and a fuel tank with a gauge were musts. Rocketship began by stripping away everything but the two individual burners. Then it found its insight sitting in the shop, in the form of one of those DeWalt jobsite boom boxes that are protected by metal exoskeletons. The Rocketship designers thought, What if we encased the burners, pipes, windscreen, and fuel tank in a similar skeleton? The product—the name and brand are still embargoed—will launch in the next year. The story makes sense once you learn a bit more about Rocketship. “All the product designers here are Eagle Scouts,” says director Michael Horito. “And we all work as Scout leaders. We can’t help but look at gear with a critical eye.”


Ultimately, it’s that type of passion that drives product innovation. David Earle spent most of his career as an in-house product designer in the bike industry at brands like Bontrager, Santa Cruz, Specialized, and Trek. When he left to start his own shop, the Sotto Group, he made a list of everything that worked well with mountain-bike suspension designs—and then set out to beat them. He didn’t wait for a client to commission the work; he just dove in. The result was the original Switch suspension design that he later developed in collaboration with Yeti Cycles. It’s not hyperbolic to say that the Switch (and later, Yeti’s in-house, updated Switch Infinity) is one of the highest-performance suspension designs on the market. “Sometimes brands will come to me and say they want something different,” says Earle. “You can always make something different. It’s harder to make something better.”

Of course, nobody gives the independent product designers props publicly. And that’s exactly how they want it.

How to Build the Ultimate Winter Vehicle for $10,000

>

Driving in winter conditions isn’t just dangerous; it can also do lots of damage to your vehicle. So I set out to build a truck capable of tackling this season’s unique challenges, on a budget low enough that I don't have to worry about rust, dents, and a filthy interior covered in muddy dogs’ detritus.

Here’s how you can do the same. 

Do you need a dedicated vehicle for winter? Of course not. You can just put studless winter tires on whatever you drive already in order to achieve the ability to drive safely in low temperatures and on snow and ice. And you can always take some of the lessons below and use them to convert whatever you’re driving into a more winter-ready machine. For that, skip the part about the truck and move on to the tires.  

All that said, I think a dedicated vehicle makes my family’s life easier and will ultimately save us time, money, and hassle. By buying a cheap old truck, I’m keeping the road salt off my old Land Rover so it won’t rust. By choosing that truck carefully and modifying it specifically to suit winter conditions, I’m also increasing our safety, minimizing the odds of us getting stuck, and giving us the ability to easily get unstuck should the weather turn particularly bad. We’ll still use our other cars during the winter months, only now we have a dedicated machine for handling the gnarly stuff. If you face similar challenges, or also enjoy winter sports, I think you’ll benefit similarly.  

You want something reliable, useful, and nice enough that you won’t mind driving it. For me that was a 1998 Toyota 4Runner Limited with 228,000 miles on it. These trucks were simple and used common components that can be found in many other vehicles from the same era, which makes parts cheap and maintenance easy. (More on that in a bit.)  

I chose a vehicle with four-wheel drive, rather than all-wheel drive. By locking the speed of the front and rear axles together, four-wheel drive doubles your ability to use the traction provided by your tires, making it more capable than all-wheel drive. But you have to switch in and out of 4WD manually. Using 4WD on dry roads can be dangerous, and doing so will damage your transmission. All-wheel drive can’t find quite as much traction but doesn’t require that a driver employ good judgment, so it may be a better choice for many people. Neither system helps while braking or cornering. 

I also drive off-road nearly every day of the week, even in the winter, and want to use this truck to support all of our skiing, hunting, and other outdoor adventures, regardless of the weather. So I opted for a rugged, body-on-frame SUV. Compared to a car-based crossover, this means I end up with less interior space, worse fuel economy, and a taller center of gravity, which can make driving it in slippery conditions tricky. If you’re staying on the road, you may want something that does without those caveats: an old Subaru, basically. 

The 4Runner is also fitted with a few other features that suit our needs. A low-range transfer case helps control speed while climbing or descending steep stuff. This becomes even more important in winter, because things get so slippery. A locking differential on the rear axle adds the ability to find even more traction than 4WD. And the leather interior is just nice enough, even this many miles in, that we don’t mind spending time in it. 

And because third-generation 4Runners are pretty common, I’ll be able to pull all the extras off this one if it ever succumbs to rust or a crash, then just bolt them onto an identical replacement vehicle. Basically, if this car winds up in a ditch this winter, it won’t be a big deal. But I’ve reduced the odds of it ending up in that ditch as much as possible.

Winter tires use a rubber compound that remains pliable in subfreezing conditions and wicks water away the split-second it’s in contact with ice. Those factors, plus a more open tread design, drastically improve traction in the winter when compared with all-season tires. 

All-terrain tires are fitted with a stronger structure beneath the rubber, which helps the tires remain on the wheel at low tire pressures (necessary for good grip and ride off-road), and feature a tread pattern designed to key mechanically with rocks and dirt without retaining mud. 

The only tire constructed like an all-terrain, but fitted with a true winter compound and a tread pattern that compromises between the two, is the Cooper A/TW. Since I still travel off-road in the winter, they’re the perfect tire for this vehicle. I explored them in-depth in this review. 

Buy Now

The larger a tire is, the easier it will roll over off-road obstacles. But the larger a tire is, the heavier it will be. Weight is a particular issue here because tires rotate, and the heavier they are, the harder it will be to accelerate and slow the rotation of those tires. The previous owner, a smart guy, figured that mimicking the stock tire size of a last-generation Jeep Wrangler Rubicon wouldn’t just result in a good compromise between capability and weight but would also give him (and now me) the widest-possible choice for good rubber. 

I’m writing about tire size in a section about suspension because it’s important to keep a vehicle as low as possible while still clearing your tires throughout their entire path of movement. Going up in tire size necessitated a lift, but with these 32-inch tires, that lift can be kept to a modest 1.25 inches. 

Lifting a vehicle can get complicated fast and isn’t possible on everything. If you go the AWD crossover route, do yourself a favor and stick to a tire size that will work at the stock suspension height. You can figure that out using this tool. Lifting those vehicles ruins their good on-road dynamics and doesn’t net you enough added off-road ability to make that worthwhile. 

For the 4Runner, we were able to lift it with the aid of suspension alone, which also gave us the chance to fit higher-quality Fox 2.0 shocks in the front and rear. This helps smooth out the ride and gives us equipment that won’t wear out or overheat through challenging terrain. 

For off-roading in winter, the extra clearance achieved by the combination of taller tires and suspension helps keep the body clear of deep snow. It also adds a little reassurance that I’m not going to whack something important on an unseen obstacle hiding beneath the white stuff. By keeping that lift as low as possible, I’m also keeping the now-taller vehicle as stable as possible. 

Buy Now

The number-one cause of accidental deaths in Montana is deer strikes. Swerving or slamming on the brakes to avoid an animal that jumps into the road, especially when that road is slippery, can be incredibly dangerous. The quarter-inch-thick steel of this ARB bumper is capable of shrugging off animal strikes without damage. 

Bumpers also shrug off light knocks off-road (or in parking lots) and give you the ability to mount other accessories like driving lights and winches. They also provide easily accessible recovery points that are strong enough to withstand winching and snatching. 

Versus a bull bar or similar “protection” parts that retain the stock plastic bumper, ARB’s equipment is also certified to the most stringent governmental standards in the world (Australia’s) to ensure that your vehicle’s crumple zone and airbags still function as intended. And they do this while offering more protection for your car than the alternative. 

Buy Now

Not only are winter nights longer, but winter driving conditions dictate that you must take action to avoid animals, obstacles, or ice as early as possible if you’re to successfully avoid them. Auxiliary driving lights are able to reach much farther, with much more brightness, than your stock headlamps (especially on an older truck), empowering you with the ability to take evasive action earlier. 

There’s a ton of crazy-cheap aftermarket lighting options, but none of them produces anything like their claimed levels of illumination, and those will likely die an early death due to the failure of their cheap components. In contrast, ARB’s Intensity lights live up to their performance claims and will likely outlast the life of this truck—and the next one I fit them to. 

I opted for the smaller AR21 lights. As the name suggests, they’re each fitted with 21 LEDs, contained in a seven-inch circle. Each puts out 6,950 lumens, blanketing everything in front of the car with light as far as you can see. I also fitted a set of amber covers. These reduce light output by 15 percent, but by increasing the wavelength of that light, they actually increase visibility in snow or rain. That longer wavelength of amber light doesn’t refract or reflect off precipitation as much as white light, helping you see through it. And amber light increases contrast, which can be especially useful if you’re trying to parse nuanced surface changes when everything around you is white. 

Buy Now

Using a winch can be very dangerous. The tension created by thousands of pounds of pulling power just doesn’t end well if anything in the system fails, or if you rig a pull improperly. That leads to two conclusions: you should buy the highest-quality winch your budget allows, and you should probably get some training in how to use one. 

Rather than opt for a cheaper brand, I went with the cheapest suitable option from the most reputable winch maker: Warn. Its VR-8S winch has an 8,000-pound pulling capacity and 90-foot synthetic line. To determine how much winch you need, look up your gross vehicle weight rating (the weight of your truck plus a maximum load) and multiply that by 1.5. The 4Runner’s GVWR is 5,250 pounds, so that formula means I need a winch that can pull at least 7,875 pounds. 

Going for a synthetic line over steel adds $200 to the price, but it also adds safety and reduces weight. Not only are synthetic lines stronger than steel, but they do not store energy under tension, meaning they’ll fall to the ground—rather than whip through the air with deadly force—if they break. They’re also 80 percent lighter, significantly reducing the amount of weight carried in front of my truck. Also, synthetic lines don’t corrode like steel does, and since we’re talking winter, that’s another important consideration. 

Buy Now

Cold temperatures and lots of moisture are hell on vehicles. Add in road salt, and all components on your car will wear faster and face challenges in winter weather. So bringing them up to date on maintenance is essential before it gets cold. 

The 4Runner came to me with fresh fluids and a new timing belt. But it needed new brakes and a new rear axle seal. I paid a real mechanic $350 to do the brakes, since they’re so vital to safety, but I saved money by replacing the axle seal in my driveway, with the aid of the former owner. That probably cost about $200, since I needed to buy a seal puller and have the bearing pressed home at a machine shop, as well as replace the rear diff’s gear oil. 

To get it ready for winter, I also fitted new headlight bulbs, tested the battery, and changed the oil. A thorough inspection in the engine bay, and underneath, gives me peace of mind that nothing else is on the verge of failing. 

I strapped a shovel to the roof rack and loaded up a Rubbermaid Action Packer with a tire-plug kit, a small compressor, and a snatch strap with proper shackles. That basic equipment will easily deal with the most common problems any vehicle faces, giving me the ability to excavate the truck from a snow drift, repair a flat tire, or bum a tow, all without waiting for AAA to show up. I also throw a portable jump starter in the glove box any time I’m headed out overnight, just to make extra sure that the truck will start the next morning. I consider this equipment the minimum necessary in any of my vehicles.