Summit Day Isn’t Always About the Summit

Why do we push ourselves, anyway?

A couple hundred feet from the top of Avalanche Gulch on Mount Shasta last Monday morning, my friend Abi and I had a check-in.

“I’ll probably need to cry today at some point,” she said up to me as I leaned on one cramponed ski boot in the frozen snow. The sun had just popped onto Casaval Ridge above the route we had climbed, warming the snow and sending small ice balls down the gulch.

“Sure, whenever you need to,” I said. This was her fourth time on Shasta, and I was sure she wanted to finally summit this time, and we had a pretty good weather forecast and no real reason to rush.

Abi had spent yesterday, her second Mother’s Day as a mother, slogging up from the Bunny Flat trailhead to our camp at Lake Helen, and in our conversations the previous couple days, she mentioned crying—but in a crying-and-then-moving-on way, not a crying-and-giving-up way. She also mentioned a few times that she felt out of shape compared to previous, pre-child years, and she wasn’t convinced she’d be able to get to the top of the mountain. Forest, Mitsu and I, her partners on the trip, said of course, totally no pressure at all, do whatever you’re comfortable with.

In my head, though, I was really rooting for her to summit. Third priority, of course, after getting her back to her son Quin and husband Eddie alive (No. 1), and having fun (No. 2). I figured three times halfway up a big, snowy volcano was fine, but a fourth time with no summit might feel pretty disheartening for her. Still, she definitely wasn’t sure when we reached 8,000 feet, or 10,000 feet.

Abi and I topped out on Avalanche Gulch and sat down to wait for Forest, eat some food, and take a break before trudging up the final 1,300 feet to the top. I have been above 12,000 feet dozens of times in my life, and I have never felt good at that altitude. Food doesn’t taste good, my digestive system usually gets pretty wonky, I’m tired, and I almost always have a headache. That’s usually enough to make me want to quit. But, like most male mountain climbers, I’ve never had my period or been lactating at high altitude. Or, had my period and been lactating at the same time.

“I’m bleeding into my pants and I’m going to need to milk myself when we get down,” Abi said, grimacing and trying to eat some Cheez-Its. We talked about the view to the west, the lingering snow on the peaks of the Trinity Alps, the next few hundred feet of climbing up the snow slope to the bottom of Misery Hill, and smartphone apps to track your menstrual cycle, which is a thing I know about.

When I asked Abi to come with us on this trip a few months ago, I hadn’t realized it was Mother’s Day. And when I realized it the week before, I felt bad that she’d be dragging a heavy pack up a big mountain that day instead of spending the day with her family. But Abi was into it, Eddie was into watching Quin by himself all weekend, and the higher we got on the peak, the more I thought she might finally summit. And maybe that would be a great moment for her.

We stomped up to 13,200 feet, the bottom of Misery Hill, so named because, no shit, it’s a miserable slope of rock that’s in your way of the summit of Mt. Shasta, and the air is thin. My boots crunched through the crust every time I kicked my crampons in, and I started to count my steps as I gasped: A hundred steps, then take a short break. Fifty steps, then take a short break. I turned around to check on Abi a few dozen feet below, and Forest a few dozen feet below her.

At the top of Misery Hill, Abi and I dropped our packs for the last 300 feet to the top. We plodded up the snowy climbers’ trail until it gave way to the final rocky steps to the summit, and then argued about who should go first. I said she should because I’d been there before and it was her first time, and she said I should go first because if she saw me do it, the exposure wouldn’t seem as bad. Finally, she stepped forward and scrambled to the top and as she took in the view, and it was a moment, and the end of a story. Some tears, the happy kind, ran down Abi’s cheeks. Forest came around the corner and he and I scrambled up to take a summit photo with Abi.

“You give up so much of yourself when you become a mother,” Abi said. I didn’t even pretend to know how that feels or what it means because I’m not a parent, let alone a mother who’s spent the last three years carrying, birthing, and then nurturing a tiny human.

(Brendan Leonard)

Sometimes I wonder about all the time we spend doing ridiculous things like climbing mountains, and if there’s a bigger point to it or a point to it at all, and if I should try to move on to something else. I’d been on the summit of Shasta once before, in 2009, via the same route, but for years I’d wanted to ski down it. I’d brought my skis this time, and dragged them all the way up there so I could have a crack at it.

Abi plunge-stepped her way down the softening snow all the way back to our camp, and Forest and I skied ahead of her, stopping every couple hundred feet to wait. I made a hundred shitty turns and maybe five good ones in 3,700 vertical feet, and maybe the climbing wasn’t the point of the whole thing, and maybe the skiing wasn’t the point either.

What Ultrarunner Clare Gallagher Is Reading Right Now

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

You may know Clare Gallagher from her earth-shattering entrance onto the ultramarathon scene in 2016, when she came out of nowhere and won first place, nearly breaking the course record for the Leadville 100. In the two years since then, Gallagher has made a name for herself on the international ultrarunning circuit with multiple podium finishes, including a first place at the 2017 CCC UTMB series. For the Patagonia-, La Sportiva–, and Petzl-sponsored athlete, who frequently runs 80 miles per week, resting right is just as important as training. These are a few favorite books from her year’s reading. 

“I bought this book because the trail and climbing marketing manager at Patagonia, Justin Roth, recommended it. Boy, am I glad I did because it should be required reading for every American. It’s poignant and searing and I can’t stop thinking about it. A must-read novel about what it’s like for many urban Native Americans today.”

Buy Now


“My mom and a college friend both recommended this book to me. I read it in three days because it was so disturbingly captivating and mind-blowing that the author grew up in such an extreme environment and she’s basically my age. It worries me for all of the kids who don’t experience the eduction Westover was able to pursue by escaping the grip of her crazy parents. It’s worrisome even more so from a vaccination standpoint: those rural end-of-the-world, don’t-believe-in-doctors communities are putting the rest of the human population at risk of contracting preventable fatal diseases (that’s not a focus of the book, just my two cents).”

Buy Now


"I picked up this book because it’s been lauded by multiple friends and, again, my mom. It was entertaining and beautifully written, a perfect novel to read while tapering for a big race this past September—and a decent education on early 20th-century Russia.”

Buy Now


“None other than Yvon Chouinard told me to read this book back in April when I was visiting the Patagonia headquarters for a sales meeting. He could have told me to read a coloring book and I would have. Nonetheless, his fervor for the regenerative agriculture movement has been passed on to me because of this book. Regenerative agriculture is the future. By converting commercial farming methods to regenerative, topsoil-health-focused methods, farmers could literally save the world by continuing to feed everyone and sequestering carbon in healthy topsoil versus releasing carbon from dead soil as most commercial farms do today. This book is focused on the revolution in Australia. I’ll admit, I’m only halfway through, but the intro suffices to get the point across: we need regenerative agriculture.”

Buy Now


“My book club in Boulder is reading this book for October. I’ve never read a Murakami novel and reading this collection makes me want to. It’s a collection of short stories about—you guessed it—men without women. Even though I’d rather read short stories about women without men, this was a captivating second option. We’ll discuss the stories in a few weeks and I’m curious to know who else would prefer a collection about women without men. I think the overall tone would be happier and more optimistic than this one.”

Buy Now

Ryan Zinke's Interior Is a Mess

>

Last week was a no good, very bad week for the Department of the Interior and its Stetson’d chief, Ryan Zinke. 

It started with news outlets reporting that Interior’s acting inspector general, Mary Kendall, would be replaced by Suzanne Tufts, from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Tufts has no relevant investigative experience and seems to only be notable for shutting down inquiries into the redecoration of HUD Secretary Ben Carson’s office.

After a full two days of radio silence, the DOI refuted the reporting. “100 percent false information,” an Interior spokeswoman told the Washington Post. The timing of the apparent miscommunication seemed especially odd, as a concurrent report by Kendall concluded that Zinke and others had not followed the department’s travel policies in several instances. When the smoke cleared, Kendall was still the acting inspector general.  

So what does the bumpy week at Interior tell us? Can the events be chalked up to disorganization? Or is something more worrisome afoot?

Perhaps a little of both, government watchdogs say.

“You don’t have to pay close attention to say that what happened last week is so outside the realm of what usually happens,” says Elizabeth Hempowicz, director of public policy for the nonpartisan watchdog Project on Government Oversight.

What went on for those two days? “I very much think they were trying to clean up a mess,” says Kate Kelly, director of public lands for the left-leaning Center for American Progress, who worked in high-level communications in the DOI during the Obama administration.

While it’s impossible to assign motive to last week’s upheaval, the fact that it happened—and in the same week that Kendall issued a report critical of Zinke—may have sent a chilling message to the inspector general, says Virginia Canter, chief ethics counsel for Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The inspector general is a position that’s supposed to operate with complete independence, she says. “Something like this should not happen, at all.”

Among other things, that report found that Zinke had violated some of the department’s travel rules, or else that staff had excepted him from some rules. In another case, relatives who held a fundraiser for Zinke were allowed to accompany him on an official boat trip to California’s Channel Islands, but the relatives were called “stakeholders” so that they wouldn’t have to pay for the trip. The report also found that the department paid $25,000 for a security detail to accompany Zinke and his wife on their vacation to Turkey. Zinke told the inspector general that he did not request the protection. Watchdogs found that a thin excuse, however; upon hearing of the security detail, he never canceled his plans. “It doesn’t show good judgment in terms of exercising appropriate oversight of government expenditures,” says Canter.


Last week’s events bring upanother issue.

Deputy Interior Secretary David Bernhardt last week lamented to the Postof the top inspector general position, “the job has been vacant… for almost a decade. That’s not good, because that’s not the way we run the country.” But that’s not true. In fact, the events of last week point to an emerging pattern of the Trump administration not filling vacant top positions—jobs so senior that they require Senate approval, claims the organization Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER). 

Nearly two years into the Trump administration, the DOI, for instance, has nearly as many of these vacant positions that must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate (eight), as it has filled (nine). And there is currently no nominee for seven of those eight jobs, points out Jeff Ruch, PEER'sexecutive director.

Instead, the administration is staffing these jobs with “acting” chiefs, who can be selected by the administration and who therefore don’t need Senate approval. Such fill-in roles are supposed to be temporary. That’s not happening, watchdogs say. “It is becoming clear that, except when unavoidable, such as Supreme Court vacancies, the Trump Administration is bypassing the bother of Senate confirmation,” PEER wrote this week in an op-ed.

The result of this tactic is that actions by the executive branch are less accountable to both Congress and the public, the group claims.

At Interior, for example, Karen Budd-Falen, a property-rights attorney for the Bundy family and other Sagebrush Rebels, was recently named deputy solicitor for Fish, Wildlife, and Parks—a position that does not require Senate confirmation. She was long rumored to be a Trump nominee to lead the Bureau of Land Management, but given her views, it was unclear whether she could have been confirmed.

Budd-Falen will work foracting Solicitor Dan Jorjani. Solicitor is another president-appointed post, but as acting solicitor, Jorjani avoids the confirmation process. PEER noted that Jorjani issued the legal opinion earlier this year that dramatically weakened enforcement of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The change was criticized by a bipartisan group of officials from both parties.

Congress enacted a law in 1998 to keep an administration from dodging its ability to “advise and consent” on people placed in high positions. Under that act, actions taken by an official who’s later deemed to be in that job inappropriately can be disputed. “Consequently,” PEER wrote, “these acts of executive hubris may become an Achilles heel.”


As for the top man at Interior, the disarray doesn’t seem to have threatened Zinke’s security. That could change quickly, if any of several outstanding investigations involving him turn up still more problems. One investigation involves his business affairs inMontana. 

Still, there’s little serious talk of Zinke feeling pressure to leave or quit. “He’s got the president’s support. He’s got industry backing him up. He’s had a free ride from the committee in terms of oversight. He’s got a very protective cocoon around him,” says Representative Raúl Grijalva, a Democrat from Arizona and the ranking minority member on the House Natural Resources Committee, which oversees affairs related to the nation’s public lands and waters.

But some things could change come November 6. If Democrats take the House, they would again take the reins of Grijalva’s committee, and with it the ability to exercise subpoena and investigative power. Of course, the administration wouldn’t change at the midterms. But, says Grijalva, “the rules of engagement change.”

John Wesley Powell's Perilous Journey Down the Colorado

In 1869, John Wesley Powell led nine men and four boats on the first documented descent through the Grand Canyon. As is made clear in this excerpt from ‘The Promise of the Grand Canyon,’ it was a hell of a challenge.

Facebook Icon

Twitter Icon

sms

email

The Colorado River Exploring Expedition had an ambitious goal: float more than 900 miles from the Green River in present-day Wyoming, down to the Colorado River, and through the Grand Canyon to the confluence with the Virgin River, in what is now Utah. Led by John Wesley Powell, a one-armed Civil War veteran and geologist, the expedition consisted of ten men and four wooden rowboats. They launched on May 24, 1869, and things quickly went sideways: rations were lost in the river, one man abandoned the expedition, and boats were routinely damaged—one of them irreparably. After more than two months, the remaining nine men arrived at the Grand Canyon battered and running low on supplies. In this excerpt from The Promise of the Grand Canyon (July 2018, Viking, $30), author John F. Ross documents how even then the biggest test of the journey remained in front of them.


On August 5—the expedition’s 74th day—3,100 feet above sea level, the expedition finally pushed off into the Grand Canyon, just downriver from today’s Lees Ferry, nine miles south of the present Utah-Arizona border. They had half the vertical distance left to descend, but only one-third of the mileage in which to do it. Several days earlier, George Y. Bradley, a former soldier, noted that only 15 pounds of bacon remained. About that time, mountain guide John Sumner had shot a mountain sheep, the last of the game they would find. Although unaware that they had entered the Grand Canyon they certainly understood that something was up. “With some feeling of anxiety we enter a new canyon this morning,” recalled Powell. “Below us are the limestones and hard sandstones which we found in Cataract Canyon. This bodes toil and danger.” Powell could now read the canyon walls with increasing sophistication. Horizontal rock layering, he noted, often meant an absence of rapids. When those same layers tilted downstream, they generally signaled that the river would flow faster, although probably not arousing any serious whitewater. But when the layers inclined upstream, the river often turned violent.

At Lees Ferry, the whitish-gray Kaibab limestone at the water level would provide a benchmark of sorts for the next 300 miles. The Canyon would altogether cut downward through 19 distinct rock formations, some of them many hundreds of feet deep. Each new layer pushed the Kaibab higher until it gleamed a mile above their heads. No geologist—or non-geologist for that matter—had been able to experience the unfolding of Earth’s history in such a fashion. From the merely 270-million-year-old Kaibab they would push deeper and deeper into the past, until they encountered the so-called basement rocks, hard granites and schists that had lain there for 1.7 billion years— among the oldest exposed rocks in the Southwest and nearly half the age of the Earth. Their descent left them feeling that they were penetrating the very bowels of the Earth.

Powell turned to literary metaphor: the Grand Canyon as the “library of the Gods . . . The shelves are not for books, but form the stony leaves of one great book. He who would read the language of the universe may dig out letters here and there, and with them spell the words, and read, in a slow and imperfect way, but still so as to understand a little, the story of creation.” This book was replacing the narrative in Genesis. The stories of Adam and Eve, and the great flood, were yielding to visions of dinosaurs roaming the Earth, of great inland seas, volcanic disruptions, mountains thrust up and worn away. Powell could read it all in the rock. Even to a man of Powell’s formidable imagination and ability to confront the unknown, the experience proved overwhelming. Powell would not be the first to feel the cold realization of humanity’s relative new-coming, yet few would experience it so viscerally as did Powell that summer of 1869. It would force him to reflect in powerful new ways about the relationship of humans and the natural world.


In the Canyon, the Colorado River Exploring Expedition would encounter 360 rapids and the worst whitewater of their journey. The men entered the Canyon a ragged mess, not one of them owning a complete set of clothes. Nor were their boats in any better shape.

Now, at most every stop, they caulked leaky seams. On August 7, after running ten bad rapids and portaging three times in Marble Canyon alone, they replaced the ribs of one boat. Never had they worked so hard, and now they had to cut rations even more. Portaging admittedly became easier with fewer supplies to haul, but their steadily weakening bodies now made more mistakes. Two days earlier, the exhausted men had dropped Emma Dean while portaging, busting a hole in its side that required major repair.

The lightened boats did appear to ride the waves better. On August 10, Powell seemed to brush away some degree of caution; and so they ran 35 rapids—some of them bad ones—in 14 miles, emerging from Marble Canyon where the Little Colorado River comes in from the left. Here they took a two-day break, Powell taking the latitude by fixing on the North Star, which indicated that they were as far south as their destination, Callville—“so that what we run now,” noted Bradley, “must be west from this point.”

They now prepared to enter the Inner Gorge, the core of the Grand Canyon. Years later, in the sanctuary of his government office, Powell would mark that pivotal moment with the words for which he is best known: “We have an unknown distance yet to run, an unknown river to explore. What falls there are, we know not; what rocks beset the channel, we know not; what walls ride over the river, we know not. Ah, well! We may conjecture many things.” Grand sentiments indeed. He noted that the men joked before setting off, “but to me the cheer is somber and the jests are ghastly.” In that day’s journal, Bradley reported that the men were “uneasy and discontented and anxious.”

After running 15 miles in two hours of near-continuous whitewater, they heard a roar unlike anything they had encountered before and quickly pulled ashore. Powell climbed the cliffs to scout what others would later call Hance Rapid, returning with somber news. A mile downriver, the Colorado passed over hard granite—a situation the men would come to dread, for it often equated with hellish whitewater. The river’s course through softer sedimentary rock, which they had run and labored through since Green River City, now yielded to metamorphic rock, forged by continental-scale pressure and heat from within the Earth’s interior to come out as hard, sharp, and unforgiving. The jet-black Vishnu Schist seemed to suck the light from anything near it, except when occasionally—and surprisingly—veins of raspberry sherbet–colored Zoroaster granite shot through it. Unable to erode this unyielding rock as easily as the sedimentary formations, the river becomes a caricature of a whitewater passage, cutting through vertical walls now thousands of feet high. “No rocks ever made can make much worse rapids than we now have,” noted Bradley gloomily. The jagged rock gnawed on their ever-weakening boats.

The next morning, “emphatically the wildest day of the trip so far,” wrote Bradley, they lined and portaged Hance, then ran a bad rapid at its foot. Two miles later they heard the throaty rumble of yet another menacing rapid, so thunderous that they had to shout to be heard—“a long, broken fall, with ledges and pinnacles of rock obstructing the river,” wrote Powell, the torrent breaking “into great waves on the rocks” and lashing itself “into a mad, white foam” for a third of a mile before the river turned sharply to the left and out of view. Sumner, never one to show fear, noted that a line of 15-foot standing waves made his hair curl. The steep walls offered no point of purchase to line the boats or any places to portage. “We must run the rapid,” wrote Powell, “or abandon the river.”

“Who follows?” Sumner shouted. The young men on the expedition, Andy Hall and Billy Hawkins, yelled back, “Pull out! We’ll follow you to tidewater or hell.” Sumner, Powell, and William Dunn, a hunter and trapper who had most recently been working in Colorado, shoved out into the turbulence, riding one wave to its top like a roller coaster, then dropping precipitously into the trough. Again and again they bounced and thrashed through these mad waves until they struck the crest of one as it broke. The boat plunged underwater, its center compartment filling completely, Sumner and Dunn desperately trying to avoid the rocks. Powell frantically bailed as best he could. A whirlpool spun them, but the boat did not sink, and somehow came through.

“I have been in a cavalry charge, charged the batteries, and stood by the guns to repel a charge,” wrote Sumner. “But never before did my sand run so low. In fact, it all ran out, but as I had to have some more grit, I borrowed it from the other boys . . .” They named the rapid Sockdolager, a 19th-century term for a bare-knuckled knockout punch. They had just entered what later boaters call Adrenaline Alley—40 miles of chaotic whitewater. That night, denied any place to lie down, the men wedged themselves painfully into niches in the wall.

Mistakes and mishaps piled up. The day after Sockdolager, hunter and editor Oramel Howland lost his notes and river map; then 16-foot Emma Dean broke her bow rib on a rock. The following day, the cook knocked the baking soda tin into the river, so their musty bread would now also be unleavened.

Near constant rain, which often turned torrential at night, served as its own plague, extinguishing their driftwood fires almost immediately. For several nights, they huddled two to a blanket, shivering against the cliff until dawn. Powell wrote that they were more exhausted by the night’s discomfort than by the day’s toil. No matter what they did, they could not keep their food dry. The constant alternation of soaking and heating had ruined their bacon, leaving them with a thin ten days’ rations of flour, some dried apples, but plenty of coffee at least.


On August 22, they returned to the limestone, which enabled them to run a dozen rapids in a similar number of miles. At midday they passed an odd rock in the middle of the river, like nothing they had seen before: a 50-foot plug of dark volcanic basalt standing as a silent marker to a world that would transform itself just a mile downstream. They pulled up shortly thereafter at the head of a massive rapid, today known as Lava Falls.

Everywhere black lava coated the older rocks like tar. Gone was the symmetrical limestone and sandstone layering, now yielding a geological chaos. Beginning about 850,000 years before, waves of molten rock had erupted from numerous vents both on the rim and within the canyon, flowing through the side canyons, then pouring into the main river channel. The expedition bestowed the name Vulcan’s Throne to a cinder cone volcano, its 4,000-foot peak sitting high above on the north rim on the boaters’ right. Some 13 lava dams had blocked the lower canyon, one of them filling it to a height of more than two thousand feet, another flowing 86 miles down the river course. “What a conflict of water and fire there must have been here!” wrote Powell. “Just imagine a river of molten rock running down into a river of melted snow. What a seething and boiling of the waters; what clouds of steam rolled into the heavens!”

The formidable hydraulics of Lava Falls forced them once again to line and portage. But afterward, the whitewater eased and they swept along for 35 miles. They began on their last sack of moldy flour.

The next day, they again traveled 35 miles, which elicited a glimmer of optimism. But the river was not yet done with them. The following day, August 27, the Colorado darted south, then west, then south again. Worst of all, the dreaded dark granite reappeared downriver. The hope blooming among these desperate men withered, then blacked out altogether when they heard the roar of a rapid that made all of the others pale in comparison.

They pulled over and gazed silently at it. Two side canyons entered the river nearly opposite one another. The river first bounced through boulders washed out of the side canyons coming in from the left, then hit rapids caused by the rocks from the canyon on the right. A granite reef reached one-third of the way across the river. The resulting Z-shaped rapid had no apparent way through. “The spectacle is appalling to us,” wrote Bradley dramatically even for the master of the superlative. “The billows are huge and I fear our boats could not ride them if we could keep them off the rocks.”

That morning and afternoon they spent climbing the rock walls, first from the right bank, then the left, searching for a path around this monster. Scrambling for a mile or more over the granite, they found their way entirely impeded. A portage would work only if they could haul the boats up eight hundred vertical feet then come back down, which Powell calculated would take ten days, an impossible feat with only five days’ rations left. They had already wasted half a day on the search itself. Three more rapids—all looking equally formidable—loomed below this one. “[T]o run it would be sure destruction,” Powell wrote plainly. The vise had tightened, closing off whatever slight room for maneuver they had enjoyed before. “We appeared to be up against it sure,” wrote Sumner.

Before sunset, Powell climbed down the cliffs to announce a plan that he and Sumner had worked out. They would lower the boats on the rocky bank to avoid the first falls, then run to the head of the second, which they would try to skirt through a chute on the right side.  Then they would try to cross to the left to avoid a boat-destroying boulder. An iffy plan at best, but it was all they had. They ferried across, then sat down to drink coffee and chew on half rations of tasteless, unleavened balls of bread, the rush of the river loud in their ears. “This is decidedly the darkest day of the trip,” scribbled Bradley in his journal.

After this slim repast, Oramel Howland asked Powell to join him on a walk. Up a short distance into a side canyon, out of earshot of the camp, he urged Powell to call off the expedition. He informed Powell that he, his brother Seneca, and Dunn had decided to abandon the river.

Somewhere not too far downstream—but still at an unknown distance—the Virgin River fell into the Colorado. Twenty miles up that tributary stood a Mormon settlement. An overland hike to such an outpost from where they now stood would entail crossing some 75 miles of desert, but Howland believed the recent rains would have left enough water pockets to keep them going. And they might find some game along the way. For the elder Howland, the odds of surviving such a desert journey looked much better than running the next rapid, and who knew how many more after that. The five days of half rations could easily rot away with another wetting. The granite showed no signs of abating any time soon. Howland had reviewed his best odds for survival—and they pointed away from the river. Powell could not disagree that the expedition had reached a critical juncture.

“Of course I objected,” Powell wrote later, “but they were determined to go.” The time for glorious speeches invoking the national importance of the mission had long since passed. At his core as a commander, Powell understood that he had to honor the Howland party’s decision—the expedition was not a military unit but a mishmash of volunteers serving at their whim.

On the morning of August 28, Howland, Dunn, and Seneca would walk out, the remaining six having “come to the determination,” wrote Bradley, “to run the rappid or perish in the attempt.”

“They left us with good feelings,” recorded Bradley, “though we deeply regret their loss for they are as fine fellows as I ever had the good fortune to meet.” The trio climbed a crag to watch the others in a final gesture of goodwill.


Powell joined Andy Hall and the cook aboard 24-foot Kitty’s Sister, which then pushed off into the current, shooting along the rock wall, then dangerously grazing one large rock. Just before reaching the second fall, they pulled directly into the smooth tongue of water that poured into the mouth of the whitewater. But an unseen hole caught them, their boat filling with water, and they smacked into a giant wave. But in a second, the boat punched through the wall of water.

Pulling their oars for all they were worth, Hall and Hawkins muscled Kitty’s Sister across the river with Powell shouting commands, narrowly avoiding the great, dangerous rock in mid-channel. They slammed through in little more than a minute. Maid of the Cañon followed the same line through the uproar; both boats escaped damage. Scouting—and hard-earned experience—had paid off with their lives.

Below the fall, the exhilarated men signaled the Howlands and Dunn to join them, hoping they might follow in the small boat. But the trio turned away to begin their journey. Powell would name this spot Separation Rapid. “Boys left us,” he noted simply in his journal. They would never be seen again.

All that morning the remaining two boats battled down a series of terrifying rapids, until at midafternoon they encountered yet more volcanic rock and an unrunnable section of whitewater that they would dub Lava Cliff Rapid. They determined to line the rapid by tying together several lengths of rope. Bradley volunteered to keep Maid off the rocks from within the boat. Powell’s brother Walter and Sumner carried 130 feet of rope and scrambled up the rocky cliff, Bradley soon obscured by the overhang. With Bradley fending off the rocks and walls with his oar, the boat lurched foot by foot as the men high above paid out the rope. Maid rolled and tumbled, the now-soaked Bradley fighting for balance. In short order, as the men climbed even higher above the river, the rope ran out. Walter wrapped the end around a rock knob, while Sumner dashed back for more. Meanwhile Bradley bounced violently in Maid.

The boat shuddered badly each time it slammed against the rock; Bradley realized that he did not have much longer. With remarkable coolness—“just as I always am, afraid while danger is approaching but cool in the midst,” as he himself admitted— Bradley unsheathed his knife, ready to sever the line, all the time desperately scanning the foaming cataract downriver for “the best channel through.” He paused for several long moments, waiting for the men above to deal him more slack, but none came. At the exact moment he leaned forward to cut the line, the force of water ripped the stem post right out of Maid’s bow with such violence that it flew thirty feet into the air, still attached to the rope.

Like a rocket, Maid shot forward into the maelstrom, Bradley getting off a first, then a second stroke to swing the bow into the waves before the water took complete control. Just when the men above glimpsed Maid, it plunged into a deep hole and disappeared. In the next instant, Maid spat out, crested a massive standing wave, only to smash into yet another wall of water. Narrowly skirting some rocks, due more to luck than to Bradley’s flailing efforts, Maid then simply vanished into the madly foaming whitewater. “We stand frozen with fear, for we see no boat,” remembered Powell. “Bradley is gone!”

But then, far below, a dark object emerged from the froth. Somehow the boat, with its man still in it, had come through intact. The hard-breathing Bradley waved his sodden hat in exultation. But he had not yet quite escaped; a massive whirlpool swung Maid in its steely grip. Not aware of how badly Maid might be damaged—was it in fact sinking?—Powell yelled for his brother and Sumner to get Bradley a line. In the most dangerous, impulsive decision of the trip, Powell, Hall, and Hawkins raced down the cliff face—then all jumped into Kitty’s Sister and frantically pushed off to the rescue.

On this journey, Sumner had always been the one engineering emergency descents and rescues, but this time Powell took charge. So the one-armed Major and the expedition’s two youngest members drove right into the river’s maw, not quite able to swing their bow directly downstream. Powell realized the impetuousness of his decision the moment they smashed headlong into the first wave. He thought he had seen a line through the rapid, but the waves washed away any such plan in an instant. At the foot of holes, waves act like animate beasts: Depending on when a boat hits it—often a matter of mere seconds—a wave may let it pass, but at other times will bend a boat so forcefully as to crush and collapse it back into the hole. What exactly happened then to Kitty’s Sister was lost in the madness of the moment. Bradley watched as they came inches from dashing themselves to pieces against the rocks. Powell later would reconstruct their passage as best as he could: “A wave rolls over us and our boat is unmanageable. Another great wave strikes us, and the boat rolls over, and tumbles and tosses, I know not how.”

Bradley, who had escaped the whirlpool, now turned to rescue the rescuers, pulling each floating man into the safety of the eddy. Only the watertight compartments of each boat had prevented it from sinking. It is doubtful whether the vessels, if heavily loaded, could have survived that awful tumult.

They righted and bailed Kitty’s Sister, then climbed aboard and rowed over to the bank to await Sumner and Walter coming down the cliffside. Only luck had saved them this time from Powell’s most impulsive bid. Bradley, who had for months proclaimed almost every new rapid to be the worst encountered, left no doubt about this one: “It stands A-No. 1 of the trip.”

There was nothing else to do but shake their heads and turn their drenched, aching bodies downstream once again. In two or three miles the river turned northwest and passed out of the granite. By noon the following day, August 29, the cliffs dropped away, the mountains receded, and they entered a valley they knew to be the Grand Wash. They had finally left the Grand Canyon behind them, a little more than 24 hours since the others had started their overland journey.

As he wrote his expedition report in the safety of his study, Powell would reach for an apt metaphor to voice the relief the entire party felt after three months of “pain and gloom and terror.” Those claustrophobic days brought to mind the time he spent in the makeshift hospital at Shiloh, battling the tides of pain from his shattered arm. It is a rare disclosure of feelings for a man who rarely acknowledged them:

“When he who has been chained by wounds to a hospital cot until his canvas tent seems like a dungeon cell, until the groans of those who lie about tortured with probe and knife are piled up, a weight of horror on his ears that he cannot throw off, cannot forget, and until the stench of festering wounds and anesthetic drugs has filled the air with its loathsome burthen, when he at last goes out into the open field, what a world he sees! How beautiful the sky, how bright the sunshine…”

Excerpted from The Promise of the Grand Canyon, by John F. Ross. Available July 2018 from Viking.

Type-A Outdoorspeople: The TV Show 'Camping' Is for You

>

The worst fight my best friend and I have ever had was over a can of Pringles. We’d just pulled our canoe out of the Rio Grande in Big Bend National Park after spending a few days in the canyon, just the two of us. Most of the trip, my uptight need to stick to The Plan (which, to be fair, existed only in my head) chafed against her whimsical sense of timing, which went along the lines of, “I’ll help pack up the tent in two seconds. I’m just going to make 13 more cups of coffee and do a little watercolor.”

Weary, impatient, and ready for a shower, I lost it when she vacillated between chip options in the campground store. “We have chips in the car,” I snapped at her. “I effing hate Pringles,” she hissed, as the pressure cooker of the past week cracked open.

I flashed back to Pringlegate several times while watching Camping, HBO’s new eight-episode miniseries.

Jennifer Garner plays the main character Kathryn, a painfully uptight Instagram famous-ish mom who has planned a birthday weekend for her husband (played by David Tennant) with three other couples. The moment the group shows up at the campground, things go off the rails. Kathryn has scheduled and organized down to gritty details like Venmo charges, but structured birdwatching is not everyone’s idea of a good time. I could feel her rage when everyone stripped off their clothes and headed for the lake as she yelled, fully dressed on shore, “But swimming is tomorrow!”

Juliette Lewis plays Jandice, a new girlfriend who comes in and upsets the scene. Lewis told me she signed on to do the show after coming home from a similar camping trip. “I could see bits and pieces of my friends as I read through the script,” she says. “It’s weirdoland in the best way.”

Camping is produced by Jenni Konner and Lena Dunham, the team behind Girls. It’s a pivot from the wilds of post-college New York, but a lot of their signatures are evident: complicated, not particularly likable female characters; zingy, culturally relevant dialogue; nudity.

The funniest parts are the subtle ones. Real-life married couple Brett Gelman and Janicza Bravo play sorta-woke George and spiky Nina Joy, bickering over how Chris Sullivan’s character, Joe, treats her differently because she’s black. Joe, who was dragged along to his girfriend’s sister’s campout, lashes out because he thinks the rest of the guys don’t like him, which feels painfully relatable. Lewis’s character, Jandice, a horndog, drug-addled Reiki healer, occasionally tones down her chi enough to give the kind of life talk that often happens around campfires.

The campers are sometimes treated as caricatures, and the high-strung schlock humor can wear thin—Garner’s one-note character is particularly hard to empathize with, even if you, like me, can see yourself in her. But the details are true to life, from the Dr. Bronner’s and campfire beers to the It’s sooo nice to get awaydialogue, words that have emerged from my own mouth more times than I’d like to admit.

It would be a stretch to call it a show about the outdoors—their biggest adventure is casual fishing, so no one is living particularly bravely here—but they nail the tension around having a good time, dammit when you’ve committed to a weekend in the woods. What it does best is show how spending time together in distraction-free spaces brings out the best and worst of people’s personalities. Much the same way a backcountry sufferfest is fun only after the fact, the great Pringle debacle is now hilarious to me and my friend. It’s the same Type II fun of the emotional variety that Camping is really about.

The Best National Parks for Kids

Our wild places have plenty of adventure for younger explorers, too

When I was growing up, my parents took me to nearly every national park in the United States. I’m continuing that tradition with my four kids (made more affordable with the free pass for fourth-graders) and have learned a few things along the way. Did you know that there are Boy Scout and Girl Scout programs, Junior Ranger badges you can collect from each park, apps to download, and badges that can be earned virtually? Well, there are. And these tips will help you take advantage of all that.

Wrangell-St. Elias National Park, Alaska

“Drive at your own risk. Watch out for loose railroad spikes.” Don’t let this sign deter you from a family road trip on the 62-mile unpaved McCarthy Road to the historic mining town of Kennecott. My kids were five and two when they eagerly carried their bags across the Kennecott River footbridge to catch a shuttle to Kennecott Glacier Lodge, where they relaxed after dinner in America’s largest national park. Outfitters like St. Elias Alpine Guides can help get your kids hiking on a glacier with crampons.

Glacier National Park, Montana

When my parents drove me across the Continental Divide on Glacier’s Going-to-the-Sun Road, I squealed in excitement as we carved through cedar forests, past sheer cliffs, glacial lakes, and alpine tundra. I never appreciated it as an engineering marvel until I photographed my toddlers learning how to walk among the wildflowers flourishing at 6,646 feet, the kind of interior backcountry park areas that are normally inaccessible to children.

This is the only place in America where you’ll find these four designations: national park, biosphere reserve, international peace park, and world heritage site. It’s one of the last ecologically intact areas remaining in the temperate regions of the world. My kids recommend Glacier’s family packs (guide-and-goodie-filled backpacks that parents can check out from the visitor center) and the interactive “Wildlife Superpowers” exhibit.

Mount Rainier National Park, Washington

At 14,410 feet above sea level, Mount Rainier is a magnificent fourteener to summit with your budding peakbagger. It’s the tallest and most active volcano in the Cascade Range and has the largest system of glaciers outside Alaska. The kids’ programs include virtual guides to animals, plants, glaciers, and volcanoes.

Zion National Park, Utah

There are no age limitations for canyoneering waterfalls, Navajo sandstone cliffs, and technical slot canyons in Zion National Park, as long as you know what you’re doing (no guided services are allowed) and obtain a permit. If you don’t know what you’re doing, you can take a class with Zion Rock and Mountain Guides or go on their family canyoneering adventure just outside the park, where the guides have rappelled a two-year-old(!) down a canyon. For something tamer, the park has a wealth of kids’ programs and a nature center that’s open daily from 2 to 6 p.m. in summer.

Riding 100 Miles* on a 102-Year-Old Bike

During the 2018 California L’Eroica, Bike Snob NYC braved saddle sores and a single pizza-size gear on a century-old Mead Ranger—all in an attempt to prove that bike technology hasn’t gotten that much better. Or to prove that, well, maybe it has.

Facebook Icon

Twitter Icon

sms

email

In 2014, I traveled to Gaiole in Chianti, Italy, for L’Eroica. Founded in 1997 to “reconnect others to the heritage that inspired much Italian history, literature, culture, and music,” the Eroica ride travels the famed Strade Bianche of Tuscany. Participants must ride vintage or vintage-inspired bikes that adhere to the following specifications: shifters on the downtube or bar ends only; toe clips and straps or original pedals for older bikes (no clipless allowed); no “aero” brake cables (they must run out the top of the lever and over the bars); wheels with low-profile rims and no fewer than 32 spokes.

Riding any type of bicycle in this beguiling region would have been stunning. Riding a vintage bike (even a loaner of questionable provenance) was transcendent. I’m hardly alone in feeling this way, which is why the Eroica format has replicated itself in various other sumptuous cycling destinations around the world, including the Peak District of Great Britain, La Rioja in Spain, and Paso Robles on the central coast of California, where I traveled in April to partake in my second Eroica.

(Benedict Wheeler)

Four years ago, I’d spent my flight home from Italy fantasizing about the platonic ideal L’Eroica bike I would build. I already had a smattering of vintage components at home, as well as a Giro d’Italia–pink lugged Italian frame from the 1980s. The whole thing was really just a Campagnolo groupo, some white accessories, and a wheel build away from Pepto-Bismol-hued glory.

But over the ensuing years, I never made it back to Italy or got it together to build that classic bike. So, as L’Eroica California approached, I had to figure out what to ride. Thanks to the ever-increasing popularity of the format, putting together an appropriate bike for this event is even easier now than it was four years ago—parts are everywhere, and the event is so trendy that Bianchi will even sell you a brand-new vintage model off the rack. Given this surplus, I decided I wasn’t interested in a regular old bike. I wanted a “holy shit, that’s old!” bike, something that would transform the ride into a time-travel adventure and give me a real sense of how far bike frames and components have (or haven’t) come. After all, once we worked out the pneumatic tire and the diamond frame, we were pretty much 90 percent of the way there. As someone who enjoys poking fun at bike-industry marketing, I wanted to know just how crucial to cycling enjoyment that remaining 10 percent really is. Plus, I wanted the smug sense of self-satisfaction that would come from having the oldest bike at the event. To that end, I was looking for the most ancient relic I could put under my ass without actually riding a penny-farthing.

I knew how I wanted this quest for a century-old machine to play out: After much searching, I’d stumble across the bike at a garage sale behind a table stacked with VHS tapes and old mixing bowls, then pay five bucks for it. Alas, this romantic scenario didn’t happen. Instead, I took the easy route and turned to Paul Johnson, owner of Classic Cycle on Bainbridge Island, Washington. In addition to being a full-service modern-day bike shop, Classic Cycle is a bicycle museum with an astounding collection spanning every era of cycling from the 19th century to the 21st. After some back and forth, during which Paul implored me to try a bike with a derailleur so I’d actually enjoy myself, he ultimately offered up a 1916 Chicago-made Mead Ranger. At over a hundred years old, the Ranger certainly checked the “holy shit, that’s old!” box. The safety bicycle had been invented only a couple decades prior, and unless any 102-year-olds were going to throw down at L’Eroica, this bike was was pretty much guaranteed to predate every other bike at the ride.

(Benedict Wheeler)

Intrigued, I scoured the internet for more information about the Ranger. Alas, I couldn’t find any “Safety Bike Shootout!” reviews from the period, but according to Sheldon Brown’s website (he himself owned a similar bike), a Ranger retailed for $40 in 1915 (the equivalent of just under $1,000 today), making it a fairly high-end machine. Mead sold the Ranger in various configurations, and this particular one was quite racy, with a sprung saddle, adjustable stayer-type stem, swept-back racer bars, coaster brake, and one (1) gigantic-looking gear.

But I wasn’t ready for L’Eroica yet. In addition to an old bike, I also wanted a thoroughly modern machine to use as a benchmark—something that would neatly encapsulate the various cycling refinements and innovations that have emerged since the Ranger’s heyday. (I also wanted it as a hedge, just in case riding a century-old singlespeed totally sucked.) Of course, nothing embodies the modern cycling ethos better than the oh-so-fashionable gravel bicycle, so I turned to Marin Bikes, which I figured would have the perfect thing for the local terrain, as the company is located just a couple hundred miles up the coast from Paso Robles. They agreed to lend me their $2,000 Cortina AX2. While an affordable bike by today’s standards, the Cortina is very much on trend (certainly more so than any bike I own) and has the latest everything: hydraulic disc brakes, thru-axles, tubeless-ready wheels, 35mm all-terrain tires, and an 11-speed wide-range single-ring drivetrain. Obviously the Cortina is not an Eroica-approved bike, but it is perfect for the Nova Eroica, the modern-bike ride that runs concurrently with the vintage Eroica and caters to the gravel-grinding crowd. Also, it’s purple, a color in which I’m reasonably confident the Ranger was never available.

(Benedict Wheeler)

My plan was to ride the Cortina on Saturday, a day before the official L’Eroica, on the approximately 80-mile course. (All the events run simultaneously, so I couldn’t ride the Marin in the actual Nova Eroica.) On Sunday, I’d ride the Ranger with the rest of the vintage crowd. Now, while I’m all for gonzo journalism, doing the long route on the Mead would have been stupid. There was no way I’d be able to ride up those monster climbs, and pushing an antique bike up a mountain is no different than pushing a modern one. So I opted for the 40-something-mile L’Eroica route, which included a more modest 2,000-ish feet of ascent. This, I figured, would be more than sufficient to explore both the Mead’s limits and my own while at the same time ensuring this remained a ride and not a historically themed walking tour.

I had my two end posts. Now it was time to prep the bikes.

Setting them up was like making two calls, one on a rotary phone and another on an iPhone: fundamentally the same experience yet wildly disparate in terms of refinement. I had worried that assembling the Mead would require all manner of old-timey supplies—such as a hand drill and lube made from whale blubber—but the whole bike went together quickly with just a single adjustable wrench. The trickiest part was installing the front wheel, since the fork lacked open ends and had to be spread apart in order to insert the axle, but even that I was able to do by hand. Meanwhile, the Marin required dainty little metric hex keys and a light touch. I spent more time on the twin-bolt seatpost head dialing in my saddle angle than I did on the entire Ranger for the simple reason that I could.

Once I had my two bikes, it was time for the shakedown rides. The Marin was instantly comfortable, and as I jammed up the hill at the end of the street, I ran the derailleur up the cassette with a precise series of snicks. The Mead, of course, had no derailleur, just a large pizza for a chainring up front and a personal pan pizza for a cog in back. I never calculated the actual gear inches because I figured psychologically it was better not to know. But I’d guess it to be the equivalent of the 50/21 combo on your road bike. (I’m at the point in my life where I just assume everyone’s running a compact—and where I don’t care about riding crossed-over.)

If there was going to be a problem on the Mead, I figured it would be the saddle. With its giant springs, it looked like some sort of Victorian chastity device, the cover was rotting, and sitting on it was like riding one of those sprung metal rocking horses you find in playgrounds that haven’t been upgraded since the 1960s.

(Benedict Wheeler)

As I test-rode the bike up and down the street, I began to put my finger (and my perineum) on the problem: Modern racing saddles allow you to move forward and backward and leave plenty of room for your thighs when you have to stand up or shift your weight, but the great big metal seat-pan on this one just wanted to cradle my buttocks and keep me locked in place like an ergonomic toilet seat. Eventually, I found angling the saddle down allowed me to sit more toward the nose. This provided something closer to a modern saddle experience, and sliding back into the toilet seat position gave me more leverage when I needed to put power through the pedals.

On Saturday, I clipped into the Marin and set out on my approximation of the Nova Eroica. While California may be culturally less exotic than Italy, from a cycling perspective the terrain was at least as decadent and beguiling. Five miles of dirt climbing took me to the top of Cypress Mountain, from which I surveyed an undulating landscape of green velvet hills. At times, the surroundings evoked Chianti, complete with vineyards and olive oil farms. Yet once I reached the coast, there was nowhere I could have been but California. (There was also the odd impatient pickup truck driver to remind us I was still in America, though most of the time I had the roads to myself.)

(Benedict Wheeler)

By the end of the day, I’d ridden just over 80 miles with something like 8,000 feet of ascent, and at no point had the Marin left me wanting. On the way up the climbs, I had all the gears I needed; on the way down, I had plenty of traction and smooth, consistent braking. Any shortcomings were my own.

(Benedict Wheeler)

I was not looking forward to Sunday.

On the morning of the actual L’Eroica, I cooked an ample bacon-centric breakfast and got to work dialing in the Ranger one last time—though “dialing” implies a degree of accuracy that doesn’t apply when cranking down on rusty old bolts. A few final warmup sprints up the nearest hill satisfied me that the Mead was not going to fall apart under me, so I changed into a wool jersey and shorts and headed down to the start. My only concessions to modernity were my personal electronics, my vaccinations, my sneakers, and the polystyrene safety hat I wore in just in case there was some sort of helmet requirement. (I ditched the helmet during the rollout in deference to both style and my cycling forbears. Deal with it.)

(Benedict Wheeler)

While cycling technology continues to improve, one can easily argue that, aesthetically speaking, the bicycle peaked 40 years ago and it’s been downhill ever since. The start line was a sea of vintage machines in beautiful hues, straddled by aging dentists and adorned with glistening chrome components more evocative of jewelry than performance tools. Yet even amid all this velocipedal beauty, the Mead, with its dented tubes, faded black paint job, and utilitarian demeanor, attracted attention. First, people asked how old it was; next, they remarked on that massive chainring. Only then did they move onto the frightening condition of my legs, which had gotten badly sunburned the day before. (I live in New York and my skin hadn’t seen sunlight since the previous October.)

As I muscled my way up the first gentle climb, I could feel every one of the previous day’s miles in my legs, but it wasn’t long before I grew accustomed to the bike. I happen to be one of those people who still enjoys riding singlespeed mountain bikes, so accelerating into a climb to build the momentum that will carry you up to the top feels fairly natural to me. And while, from reading bike reviews, you’d think the concept of “lateral stiffness” was something new, the Ranger was smooth and unyielding under these efforts. I was also far better prepared for the loose dirt descents than many of the other participants on their narrow rims and period-correct 21-millimeter tires. Grabbing the curbed portion of the bars and going into an aero tuck, I could bomb the downhills—though I was careful to scrub off speed occasionally so as not to overwhelm the ancient coaster brake.

Despite my best efforts at nursing the brake, I did occasionally find myself fishtailing, which immediately made me wonder about the integrity of the tires. After one such skid, I came alongside Paul from Classic Cycle, who was on a 1978 carbon fiber Exxon Graftek. I asked him when the Mead’s tires had last been changed, figuring it had to have been sometime in the last ten years or so. “Oh, probably sometime in the ’60s,” he replied. I resolved not to do any more skidding.

(Benedict Wheeler)

Of course, the best part of riding a singlespeed is the smugness you feel when geared riders experience equipment failure. That smugness increases exponentially when the bike dates back to the Wilson administration. “You know, they have these things called derailleurs now,” one rider quipped as I wrestled the bike up a steep climb. As it happened, he seemed to be waiting for another rider who was having shifting issues, and I’d have pointed out that irony if only I’d been able to breathe. And despite my inability to shift, I was forced to walk up steep grades on only three relatively brief occasions, which I didn’t mind because: 1) Plenty of other people were walking, too; and 2) it gave me a break from that goddamn saddle.

(Ultra Romance)

That aside, anything wrong with the Mead was really just a matter of age and wear. Sure, the saddle sucked, but it was also original, and who keeps a saddle for a hundred years anyway? All the bike needed was a double-railed Brooks B135 and maybe a pair of Ourys, as the rock-hard grips rendered my left pinky slightly numb for days afterward. As for performance, the coaster brake was the biggest drawback, but even today, Speedvagen will sell you a singlespeed coaster-only “Urban Racer” for like $3,500, so there you go. And while the quill stem did gradually migrate leftward during the ride in a slightly disconcerting fashion, the bike otherwise held up admirably.

I’d love to say that if I had to choose between the two bikes for next year’s Eroica, I’d go with the Mead over the Marin because of its timeless ride quality. I’m not going to say that, because I’d be lying. By the end of the ride, I was more than ready to get off the Ranger for the foreseeable future, and there’s no denying that 100 years of refinement makes for a pretty sumptuous package by comparison. Even so, after riding the Mead, it’s clear to me that by 1916 we were indeed most of the way there in terms of pure cycling enjoyment, and if I got sent back to the World War I era like Bruce Willis in Twelve Monkeys, I like to think I’d have no problem slotting right into the pack and that my enthusiasm for cycling would be undiminished. For that matter, even if today I were sentenced to ride only a Mead Ranger for the rest of my life or else take up tennis, I’d opt for the former without hesitation. (Though I would insist on a new saddle.)

After a glorious weekend of West Coast riding, I loaded the bikes into a minivan so I could return them before heading back to New York. As I pulled away from the curb, the Mead fell over onto the Marin in a final attempt to crush the young whippersnapper into submission. The bike might be old as hell, but the fight isn’t remotely gone from it.

Photos by Benedict Wheeler


*You thought I actually rode a century on the Mead? Please. That would be suicide by saddle.  

Climate Change Is Already Shaping the Way We Race

>

Last winter, New Hampshire-based endurance athlete Sarah Canney qualified for the U.S. national snowshoe team. She’s now hard at work training for her world debut at the 2019 World Snowshoe Championships in Italy—but there’s just one problem. A lack of snow has hampered Canney’s ability to properly prepare for race-day conditions: last winter, the Granite State Snowshoe Series canceled all but one of its eight races due to an absence of the white stuff. 

Snowshoeing might be an obvious example of how climate change is transforming racing, but these effects aren't limited to the winter months. This summer, Ironman Hamburg had to cancel the swim portion of the race due to high algal blooms in the Binnen and Aussenalster lakes. And the Missoula Marathon, in Montana, recently announced that it will move the race from mid-July to late June in an attempt to avoid poor air quality—a side effect ofincreasingly larger and more common summer wildfires.

And these consequences of climate change—from more wildfires to low precipitation—are only getting worse.“Probably the easiest place to see it is with warming temperatures,” says Claudia Tebaldi, project scientist for the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado. “Studies show that record highs are getting more common, while record lows are almost disappearing.” 

This is particularly true in the summer. Climate Central, an independent organization of scientists researching the climate and its impact on the public, recently released a report showing that 75 percent of 244 U.S. cities in 2017 experienced longer heat waves—defined by numerous consecutive days over 90 degrees—than 50 years ago. “Participating in an endurance event in the summer is now almost masochistic,” Tebaldi jokes. 

Warming temperatures have altered the way 41-year-old Florida resident Josh Johnston chooses his running events. He used to race in November, requiring him to train through summer. “But that became too hot to consider,” he says. “I switched to winter races, but for the past two years, even February has been too hot for good half or full marathons.”

Johnston has started to focus on races up north, or shorter ones closer to home, to avoid warmer temperatures. Even that is a gamble, though. “I raced Boston in 2016 and 2017, assuming that would be ideal, but they were both warm too,” he says. “I’m starting to wait until the last minute before I sign up for races.”

Tebaldi says that when you look at temperatures across the country, very few places look like they did 20 years ago. Still, if you’re willing to travel for your races, she recommends the Pacific Northwest because that region hasn’t yet exhibited persistent rising temperatures on par with the rest of the country. “That’s still a fairly safe bet,” she says.

To find the worst climate-change impacts, look to the interior of the country—which experiences regular record-high temperatures—and the coasts, says Tebaldi. “On the coasts, we’re seeing more precipitation extremes,” she says. “We see floods and storm surges that require race cancellations.”

Ironman distance triathlete Jason Bahamundi, 44, of Dallas, has experienced this firsthand. He was on his way to race his fifth Ironman in 2015, but when his flight landed in Maryland, he was inundated with texts. “I had all these messages asking me what I was going to do,” he says. “Hurricane Joaquin was heading in, and the race director had to postpone.”

Bahamundi could defer, participate inanother Ironman race in the States, or wait in Maryland for the event’s rescheduled date, a week later. He went with the second option. “I decided to go with Ironman Florida two months later, but even that was risky because Florida had to cancel its swim in 2014 due to high winds and rough waters,” he says. “It also meant asking for more time off from work and getting back to training again.” 

With all this variability, what's a race director to do? Most are gun-shy about pointing to climate change as the reason for so many weather-related cancellations, but some race directors still createcontingency plans, just in case problems arise. Chris Dunn, organizer of the Granite State Snowshoe Series until 2015, says that he tried to arrange the race schedule to ensure adequate snow cover, with the northernmost events held earlier in the season and the southernmost later. “The winter can present significant challenges,” he admits. 

Bjorn Steinmetz, operations director for Central European Ironman, says that the swim cancellation at Ironman Hamburg over the summer was a result of the warmest summer on record in the area. Lakes and ponds contain varying amounts of bacterial blue-green algae that only becomes harmful when it grows to excessive levels. Direct sunlight and warm temperatures lead to that growth. “It’s what we must deal with now,” Steinmetz says.

In the case of the Missoula Marathon, race director Tony Banovich says the weather-pattern changes have been noticeable. “What we’re seeing in the West is that fire season is starting earlier and is more severe,” he says. “We felt the risk was high enough to warrant making the date change.” Tebaldi says this was likely the right move. “With warmer, drier summers in [the region], the conditions are ripe for fires to spread quickly,” she says. “And air circulation means that poor air quality has a big reach, hundreds of miles.” 

All of which leaves athletes faced with uncertainty, no matter the sport. For Canney, the snowshoer who worries about a lack of precipitation this winter, the options are limited. “Snowshoe racing requires different turnover and leg strength than running on the roads, so I really need that specific training before Italy,” she says. “I’d like to be ready and give worlds my best shot, but I don’t know what early winter will bring this year."

Park and Diamond Is Launching a Collapsible Bike Helmet

>

Helmets may be the most controversial piece of biking equipment. Some say they make riding safer; others that they don’t make cycling safe enough; still others that we should focus on safe driving, rather than safe cycling. For many, the decision about whether to wear one simply comes down to looks. Helmets mess up your hair and look dorky with street clothes, and, for many people, that’s reason enough to ditch the lid for their morning commute. A Brooklyn startup called Park and Diamond wants to help solve this problem—and in the processhelp reduce commuter-cyclist fatalities and injuries—with a new collapsible bike helmet ($160) that looks more like a hat than a piece of safety gear. Launched on Indiegogo earlier this month, the Park and Diamond Collapsible Helmet has already garnered 573 percent of its fundraising goal, with $286,621 and a month left to go in the campaign.

The soft-sided lid is made of polycarbonate, with EVA foam and a proprietary, patented composite material the company says absorbs and disperses three times as much energy as typical bike helmets. But unlike traditional models, the Park and Diamond helmet is thin, pliable, and breathable, and it folds up to roughly the size of a water bottle. A brimmed fabric layer slides over the polycarbonate shell to make the whole thing look like a baseball cap. (Park and Diamond says people will eventually be able to choose among different styles of outer layers. One promo video shows the helmet with a beanie-style piece on top.)

While the design is far less sporty-looking than a typical helmet, I’m not convinced it completely escapes dorkdom: as a cap it’s round and lumpy, and it’s a bit out of placepaired with a chinstrap. But the ability to roll the whole thing up and shove it in your bag—rather than clip it to your bike, where it could get stolen, or to your backpack, where it’ll flop around—could make bike commuting safer and more approachable.

Buy Now

A Beginner's Guide to Yoga

>

Whether you’re taking your first yoga class or your hundredth, it’s easy to feel lost after an hour-long practice. What does that word mean? My leg goes where? Can I hurt myself doing this? If you’re curious about how to tackle basic yoga poses properly, this guide is for you. Here are nine common poses you’re likely to see in a typical yoga class, plus commentary from alignment-focused yoga teachers about how to do each pose in a way that supports your body. (We’ve included both the English and Sanskrit names, since many teachers will use both.)

Downward-facing dog is probably the most recognizable yoga pose, and you’ll likely encounter it at least once in every yoga class. This pose gently stretches and strengthens your spine and hamstrings.

To get into downward-facing dog, start in a tabletop position, with your hands and knees on the floor. Your feet should be hip-distance apart. Then lift your knees away from the floor and push your tailbone slowly toward the back of the room where the ceiling meets the wall. Your legs do not need to straighten fully; a microbend in the knees will allow the spine to naturally curve and reduce strain in the lower back. Drop your shoulders away from your ears and actively press your fingertips into the floor.

“Often, I see people with their index fingers pointed inward instead of forward,” says Tina Templeman, a yoga teacher with 14 years of experience. “Make sure to point your index fingers straight forward to create an external rotation of the entire arm. This keeps your shoulders properly aligned.”

If you’re in a Power Vinyasa class, you’ll likely encounter chaturanga dozens of times in a traditional sun salutation. To begin, go into a plank pose, with your wrists under your shoulders and your toes under your heels. Slowly lower your body toward the floor on an exhale, drawing your elbows into your sides until they reach a 90-degree angle. From here, you can either slowly lower to the floor or go into upward-facing dog. If you find yourself dropping your shoulders, hips, or belly toward the ground in chaturanga, put your knees on the floor.

Chaturanga is a challenging pose that over time can lead to shoulder injuries, so it’s important to approach this pose with focus and caution. Cecily Milne, creator of Toronto-basedYoga Detour, says most yogis should begin learning chaturanga by practicing push-ups on an incline. “Put your hands on a chair and build your strength so you can lower your weight toward the chair and then up again without dumping into your shoulders and rounding [them] forward.”

Upward-facing dog typically follows chaturanga during a traditional sun salutation. Start by lying onyour stomach. Place your hands alongside your ribs and bend your elbows toward the back of the room. Then lift your head, chest, and neck off the floor, pinching your shoulder blades together. This is low cobra pose; it’s a great choice for people who experience lower-back pain during backbends. If you prefer to continue into upward-facing dog, straighten your arms and press the tops of your toes into the floor to lift your hips, knees, and quads off the ground.

“You want to make sure you’re engaging your hamstrings and glutes in upward-facing dog,” Milne says. “This promotes hip extension. If you let them go, there’ll be more load on your lower back, and it will likely start to hurt over time.”

To begin warrior 1, step one foot to the top of the mat, toes facing forward. Step your second foot to the back of the mat, then turn your toes to a 45-degree angle facing the front corner of the mat. Make sure your feet are about hip-width apart on the mat. Bend into your front knee and face your hips and head to the front of the mat.

“Commonly, yogis will relax their front foot and ankle in warrior 1, and then the knee dips inward or outward,” Templeman says. “Instead, try to press your foot into the floor to keep your knee in alignment. Also, think about relaxing your shoulders by spinning your thumbs behind you when your arms are up in the air. This allows your shoulders to rest, so keeping them in the air doesn’t feel like a struggle.”

To move into warrior 2, plant one foot at the top of your mat, toes facing the front of the room. Place the other foot at the back of the mat at a 90-degree angle (if that’s possible for your body) or at a 60-degree rotation. Align your front heel with your back heel, if possible. Then bend your front knee and extend your arms out long, palms facing down. Your front knee should be over your front ankle. Press into the ball of your front foot and the outside edge of your back foot. You should feel your inner thighs engage, as well as your front quad muscle. Gaze out over your front middle finger and breathe.

“I also like to remind people to draw their ribs in during warrior 2, because that strengthens your abdominal muscles and your back,” Templeman says.

Forward fold stretches the back of your body and strengthens your spine. It also gives you an opportunity to take an extra breath between fast-moving sequences. To move into a forward fold, stand with your feet about hip-widthapart, hands at your sides. Then slowly bend forward and bring your hands to the floor, keeping a microbend in your knees. If you’d like, you can grab your elbows and sway side to side to allow your lower back to release. Tuck your chin toward your throat to allow your head to relax.

“I sometimes see people lean back into their heels, but that allows your hamstrings to let go, and you could strain them,” Templeman says. “Instead, you want to put your weight into your toes when you bend forward.”

Chair pose offers the opportunity to build leg strength and lengthen your spine. Also known as fierce pose, chair pose is typically offered during traditional sun salutation variations. To go into chair pose, stand with your big toes touching and your heels slightly apart. Then lift your arms above your head, palms facing one another, as you sit your hips toward the back of the room. Imagine that your knees are glued together. Draw your belly button inward to fire up your core. If you’re pregnant or have sensitive knees, you may want to perform this pose with your feet about hip-width apart.

“People get most confused about what to do with their hips in this pose,” Milne says. “But what we really want is length in your spine. So I always say: Reach your arms out of your armpits actively up toward the sky. Keep your heels down and drive your knees forward. Your hips can be wherever they need to be as long as you lengthen the spine.”

Reclined or sleeping half pigeon pose is a hip-opening pose typically offered at the end of a vinyasa class or in the middle of a restorative yoga class. To find pigeon pose, first go into downward-facing dog. Lift your right leg up toward the back of the room, then draw your knee toward your nose. Pull your right knee toward your right wrist, then allow the right foot to draw toward the left wrist. If possible, your front shin should be almost parallel with the front of your mat. Untuck your back toes, but keep the front foot flexed to protect your knee. Walk your hands forward as much as is comfortable, perhaps even placing your forehead on the ground.

Most yoga teachers recommend using blocks and other props to make reclined half pigeon more restorative. (Try tucking a block under the right hip and placing another under your chest.) If this pose hurts your knees, ask your teacher to guide you into an alternative option, like figure four pose.

Child’s pose is a resting posture typically offered several times during class between sequences. You can also go into child’s pose as a break if you’re feeling overexerted at any point during a class. To find child’s pose, come to a tabletop position with your knees under your hips and your wrists under your shoulders. Then sit your hips back to your heels, untuck your toes, crawl your hands toward the top of the mat, and rest your forehead on the floor. If you’d like, you can slightly widen your knees to allow your chest to sink to the ground.

“This should be comfortable, but sometimes people’s feet, ankles, and knees hurt,” Milne says. “Especially if you wear hiking boots or run a lot, you might want to take this pose on your back. Actively draw your knees into your chest without using the strength of your arms. Then you don’t have your whole body weight sitting on your knees and feet.”