How Beer Will Save Western Rivers

>

Six summers ago, Kim Schonek, her husband, and an intern slid their kayaks into Arizona’s Verde River, a federally designated Wild and Scenic River. As they paddled, above them rose a rare cottonwood-willow canopy that teems with the densest population of tropical and native birds in North America. Half a mile into their trip, the river slowed, then dwindled to a trickle, until their kayaks scratched against the rocks. Schonek suggested they portage to the next flow. So they dragged their boats—for five miles.

“My husband was like, ‘I’m getting a divorce,’” Schonek says jokingly. “My intern was like, ‘I hate you, and I’m never boating again.’”

Schonek is the Verde River projects manager for the Nature Conservancy, so the prospect of a dry river presented a special problem. The 195-mile Verde River is a ribbon of green that cuts through parched canyons below Flagstaff down to the desert valley of Phoenix. It’s home to endangered fish, rare reptiles and amphibians, and 92 species of mammals. It’s a key tributary of the Lower Colorado River, which American Rivers named America’s Most Endangered River in 2017. Like many rivers that have landed on that endangered list—California’s San Joaquin, Colorado’s Upper Colorado, New Mexico’s Gila—the Verde is threatened by drought and excessive flow diversions, mainly to irrigate thirsty crops.

After the trip, Schonek started thinking about crop conversion, water-saving barley, and industries that might be motivated to save rivers. Eventually, she came up with a plan to keep the river flowing with the help of beer—an idea that, if it works, could help revive imperiled riparian areas throughout the Southwest.

On a cloudless day last December, Schonek drove me around the Verde Valley, her truck kicking up clouds of dust. The parched earth was a reminder of the months-long dearth of rain here and of the megadroughts researchers say loom in the Southwest’s future. We arrived at a diversion ditch, which siphons water from the Verde to flood crops like alfalfa.

Environmental organizations have for years encouraged farmers to convert to barley, which uses about half as much irrigation water as alfalfa and cotton. In the Southwest, this camel of crops could be especially beneficial, because it keeps water in rivers at the right time. Barley is planted in January; irrigated in spring, when rivers are flush; and harvested in June, when water is scarce. Converting just one-tenth of Verde Valley crops to barley would keep 200 million gallons of water flowing in the Verde River each summer.

But farmers have hesitated to switch for a simple reason: money. Barley’s most common use is for animal feed, which is a money-loser. So when Schonek was devising a way to save the Verde, she thought of a way to raise local barley prices by pairing farmers with an industry that uses a lot of barley and a lot of water: breweries.

“It’s kind of a new conservation technique,” Schonek says. “Instead of paying farmers every year to reduce the water they’re using, we can create a market that will drive farmers to change their water use.”

Beer-destined barley pays 50 percent more than feed barley, which would definitely help motivate farmers to switch. But the plan had its risks. Most of the barley used in U.S. craft beers comes from Canada and Europe, and Arizona doesn’t have an established barley industry. Schonek would have to make one, and she’d also have to convince farmers that the long-run financial benefits outweighed the financial hit some might take in the transition period. Fortunately, over the previous years, Schonek had created cooperative relationships with farmers in the area and had already persuaded many to replace the inefficient river-diversion gates—which farmers operated by jumping on—with automated gates that saved millions of gallons of water a day. Schonek was currently working with them to transition to drip irrigation. And it was this trust—plus the benefit of the Nature Conservancy’s financial backing—that helped her convince farmers to start Arizona’s first beer barley industry.

“We care about the river; it’s the only reason there’s farming here in the first place,” says farmer Zach Hauser, whose family owns the largest swath of farmland in the Verde Valley. “We have a huge interest in the health of the river, so anything we can do while still making a living is a win-win.”

Schonek brought in experts to teach the Hausers to grow Harrington two-row barley, and the Nature Conservancy agreed to subsidize any losses during the experimental years. Last season, the Hausers planted 144 acres of barley, some of which was sold to Arizona Wilderness Brewing Co. The brewers were so excited to have river-saving local barley that they plan to completely switch.

“Brewing is a water-intensive activity,” says Chase Saraiva, head brewer at Arizona Wilderness. “It’s pretty much a water sport, so we need to be conscious of where our water is coming from and be proactive in taking measures to help in any way we can.”

But there was one missing link: malting. Because there are hardly any malting facilities in the West, they had to malt that first batch of barley in Texas. That’s not sustainable, so Schonek teamed up with Chip Norton, board vice president of Many Rivers Brewing in Colorado, which contributes all of its profits to saving rivers. Together, next month, they will launch Sinagua Malt, a local malting facility that will dedicate profits to river conservation.

When Schonek drove me around the Verde Valley, the elements of the project were nearly in place. The Hausers’ loamy fields were ready to be sown. Next to their barns, plastic-draped malting equipment and a silo of nutty-scented raw barley waited for construction to be completed on the Sinagua Malt warehouse in Camp Verde. “The potential for a market-solution approach to crop conversion exists in lots of tributaries in the Colorado River Basin,” says Norton, holding up a handful of barley. “A lot of people are pretty excited about this, and they’re watching us closely to see if it’ll work as a way to improve stream flow and improve the flow of the Colorado River.”

If the plan works, it will be the first time an environmental organization has created a new market for the purpose of river preservation—and there’s evidence that it’s already making a difference. Last July, Schonek and her family returned to that same five-mile stretch of dry Verde River. This time, they paddled the entire way.

The Outdoor Industry's Tax Cut Dilemma

>

The outdoor industry is poised to get a big cash infusion from tax cuts, along with every other business in the country. Both the Senate and House tax bills recently passed by Congress aim to lower the corporate tax rate from 35 to 21 percent, effectively dumping billions of dollars into the laps of business. For outdoor companies, though, the money comes with a catch: Public lands were sacrificed in the deal-making to get those lower rates.

To say the tax bills are controversial is a huge understatement. Just 29 percent of voters approve of it, and the Senate’s 500-page document, riddled with loopholes, was handed out to lawmakers just six hours before the vote, with whole pages crossed out by hand and notes scribbled in the margin. It passed at 2 a.m. by two votes. The Senate and House versions were conferenced this week and go to a final vote next week. Trump hopes to sign the bill before Christmas.

The outdoor industry has been quiet, or least reserved, on its stance. “It’s a mixed bag at best,” says Alex Boian, vice president of government affairs for the Outdoor Industry Association (OIA), which has no official position on the bill. OIA was opposed, however, to the way in which three beloved pieces of public land were seemingly traded for votes. Just before the Senate vote, Trump cut Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments, a longtime request from Utah’s Republican Senator Orrin Hatch. The bill also includes legislation that would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, which was seen as a way to secure a vote from Alaska’s Lisa Murkowski. “It looks transactional, and I don’t use that lightly,” says Boian. “It’s bad lands management policy.”

It could be argued that outdoor companies are getting a fat check at the cost of public lands. If that’s the case, is it worth it? And what exactly are gear companies getting in return?

Aside from the public lands crisis the bill has already created, it’s not clear how, or if, it will help the outdoor industry as a whole, or the shoppers who keep it afloat. The major Republican article of faith is that lowering taxes will lead companies to raise wages, hire more people, and invest in more technologies, leading to economic growth—the so-called trickle-down effect. However, in a recent University of Chicago survey of 38 prominent economists across the ideological spectrum, only one said the proposed tax cuts would yield substantial economic growth.

Most of the companies we contacted—from The North Face to Solomon to Columbia—declined to comment, citing the complexity and uncertainty of a bill that was still in progress until a couple days ago. A spokesperson for Patagonia, currently embroiled in a public relations war with both Interior Secretary Zinke and the House Committee on Natural Resources over the dismemberment of Bears Ears, simply saidthe company opposes the bill. Company CEO Rose Marcario had penned a statement against the tax plan, they said, but chose not to publish it in order to keep the focus on the national monument campaign.

Steve Barker, a former OIA president and founder of Eagle Creek Travel Gear, says companies will probably spend the money paying back stocks, paying down debt, and increasing executive bonuses. “They aren’t likely to increase hiring,” he says. “They also won’t likely make capitol improvements—with most gear now made overseas, there is little need.”

In that area, some gear companies did successfully push Congress to remove a provision that would have raised taxes on goods manufactured overseas. The so-called “border-adjustment tax” was struck from the bills in July after pressure from companies like Nike and Columbia, potentially saving millions of dollars. But the other angle the outdoor industry needs to consider is how it will impact their customers.

The tax-reform bill is expected to increase health insurance costs, reduce credits for tuition loans, and remove city and state tax deductions—in other words, it would hurt many young, college-educated people on the coasts. That’s a core base of customers for the industry. “If they’re uncertain about their finances, the typical gear buyer might make due with older gear or skip the annual ski trip,” says former sporting-goods retail magnate Ken Gart, of Gart Brothers and the 140-shop conglomerate Specialty Sports Venture.

Many of these customers are also the people most upset by the government’s recent attacks on public land—among the 2.8 million who wrote in to support the national monuments. For customers, and thus for companies, the tax package created a moral dilemma when the Trump administration bargained away Bears Ears, Grand Staircase-Escalante, and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. That’s why Dan Abrams, co-owner of apparel maker Flylow, believes that if companies profit from the package, the industry should use some of that money to defend public lands. “I’m proposing we donate the savings to projects that help with that agenda.”

Companies like Patagonia, The North Face, and Arc’teryx are already doing that, either through outright donations or by funding lawsuits. (So is REI, but it’s not subject to the new tax policy due to its co-op structure.) Abrams says it would be wise for the industry to do so collectively. “It’s important that outdoor companies show our customers we care about the public lands where they use our gear.”

“No amount of economic growth is worth giving away ANWR to the oil companies,” says Barker, the former OIA president who now advocates to protect the refuge. “Once they get their drill bits into it, it’s never going to be the same. We need to fight for those lands with money.”

In other words, the outdoor industry needs to sign Trump’s Christmas bonus check right over to our public lands—or to the people who will defend them.

The Tour de France Has Outlived Its Usefulness

It’s too long, too male, too boring, and in desperate need of a rethink

This year the Tour de France is 114 years old.

Is it enough already? Should we call it quits for the world's most famous bike race? 

From a media standpoint, certainly not. The Tour de France was created in 1903 as a publicity stunt to sell sports newspapers. It was a wild success in this regard. Today the Tour supplies an entire media ecosystem with everything from mainstream sporting content to gear porn to the precious memeable moments that sustain our social media. Remember #froomerunning? He was chasing a Pikachu! Hilarious.

But what about the Tour from a sporting standpoint? As one of the most famous athletic events on the planet, it's basically a byword for competitive cycling. Sure, you and I know the landscape of cycle sport is vast and encompasses everything from the grandest Grand Tours to the mangiest alleycat, but to the person in the cubicle next to you, bike racing is the Tour de France and that's that.

In this sense, the Tour de France is the Bike to Work Day of bike races.

This is a problem. Like Bike to Work Day, the Tour de France is our one chance a year to impress the squares, and invariably we fail to do so. What happens on Bike to Work Day? The person in the cubicle next to you dusts off their bike, gets buzzed by like 50 cars, shows up at work sweaty, and calls it good until next year, if not forever.

And what happens during the Tour de France? The person in the cubicle next to you tunes in or logs on to see this Peter Sagan character you're always talking about, only to find that he was disqualified on Stage 4 and will now be taking his insouciant facial hair elsewhere, and then flips back over to baseball.

It's like bringing someone to the burger joint you've been raving about only to be told all the meat has spoiled so they're only doing salads.

The Sagan incident is nothing in the context of the Tour de France when you consider how often we've followed the entire race only to see the winner stripped of his maillot jaune months or years later, which is like pigging out at the burger joint only to find out later that the meat was full of tapeworms.

Part of the reason the Tour de France is such a risky investment is that it's so damn long. A lot can happen in three weeks. Unfortunately, a lot of what happens is boring, and the stuff that isn't boring is often disastrous. (Crashes, scandals, expulsions, etc.) The actual drama tends to play out in a handful of sprint and mountaintop finishes, or else in subplots like the points and mountains classifications, which mostly run quietly in the background like antivirus software.

Indeed, over the years the sheer length of the Tour de France has served to undermine what made it so captivating in the first place. In the beginning, the race was about self-sufficiency. Pretty much anyone could enter (provided they were male), and organizer Henri Desgrange staunchly opposed the undue influence of teams, technology, and bicycle manufacturers. Today, teams with annual budgets in the tens of millions of dollars support and insulate the leaders, and the result is predictability and a race dominated by dynasties and winning machines. It's Wall Street on wheels, and if the favorite doesn't win these days it's usually a matter of dumb luck. Sure, success begets success and you can't expect riders and teams not to use all the resources at their disposal to win, but it's undeniable that the fans are ultimately the ones who pay the price.

(Come on, does anybody actually like Team Sky? Sure, I see people riding in the jerseys, but I always assume they think it refers to the vodka.)

Length isn't the Tour de France's only problem. It's also how the organizers use that time. Wimbledon has 26 years on the Tour and also takes up a decent chunk of July, but it features both men's and women's competitions in a variety of formats. Meanwhile, with the whole world watching, the Tour organizers only offer women "La Course by Le Tour de France," a one-day race which sounds more like a fragrance branding exercise than a counterpart to the most prestigious bike race in the world. Beyond that, the only way for a woman to get on the podium of the Tour de France is as a "Tour hostess."

Of course nobody would ever suggest that the Tour de France should pack up its inflatable flammes rouges and go home. Its history is far too rich, and its best stories have yet to be written. Even those of us who have gradually decoupled from the Tour over the years would miss it, for the race is as much a part of summer as the sound of crickets in the evening. (I live in New York City and use an electronic device that generates cricket sounds, but then again I also use one to follow the Tour, so the comparison still stands.)

At the same time, for all the fuss over modern stuff like electronic transmissions and disc brakes, the Tour de France is more of a procession than a bike race, and it's an ultra-orthodox one at that. We'll probably never see a woman Tour winner just as we'll never see a woman Pope, but in a way it doesn't matter.

Let the Tour be the quaint church bells in the distance but invest your time in the events that reflect who we are and how we're riding now: the cyclocross races, the gravel grinders, the fixie crits, or whatever else it is those wacky millennials are doing nowadays. The stage race was created to sell newspapers, but we live in the digital age, and one of these days some new race is going to come along and out-click it. 

Or, better yet, just ride your bike. Sure, racing's fine, but you can't truly enjoy a ride without stopping.

Our Favorite Brand Collaborations

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

We love it when outdoor brands work together to create limited edition products that blend disparate styles. Here are our favorite brand collaborations available right now.

Topo Designs has always had a love affair with retro styling so this partnership with heritage brand Woolrich feels right. The old-school wool blankets are given a bit of pop with Topo Designs' red stripes, and it’s made in the US.

Buy Now

Iconic watch-maker Timex has been tapping men’s design powerhouse Todd Snyder for a series of watches, which sport a surprising amount of camo, but we like the new BlackJack watch, which has a sporty, midcentury feel to it.

Buy Now

Shwood enhanced their signature wood frames with Stanley’s iconic, green “Hammertone” finish for a rugged set of specs that have an everyday carry feel to them.

Buy Now

This commuter pack marries the upcycled bike tube materials which are the signature material of Portland-based Ecologic Designs with the red stitching and sleek design of Italian heritage brand, Silca.

Buy Now

BioLite partnered with Miir and Kuju Coffee to put together a limited-edition coffee-lover's kit that hinges on BioLite’s wood-burning CampStove 2, KettlePot, and CoffeePress.

Buy Now

Boot-maker Danner and leather-magicians Tanner Goods, both based in the Pacific Northwest, have collaborated on a series of kicks over the last several years. The latest, the Mountain Pass Humbolt, combines water-resistant suede with a Vibram outsole for a boot that’s meant to go from the city to the mountains.

Buy Now

Take Organic Climbing’s bouldering pad know-how and combine it with Mystery Ranch’s backpack design pedigree and you get a pad with a comfortable harness system designed to be carried for miles into the backcountry.  

Buy Now

Marmot partnered with J. Crew for the 20th anniversary of the iconic Guides Down hoodie, creating exclusive colors for the clothing store. We dig the bright Hot Orange Enamel colorway.

Buy Now

California-based Vans and The North Face recently created a line co-branded skate-park inspired goods including the Base Camp duffel, and these high-tops, which combines some of The North Face’s technical elements with Vans’ signature aesthetics.

Buy Now

To create the 10-piece North Coast Collection, members of Mission Workshop and Taylor Stitch took a van-fuel bike and surf trip up the coast of California. One of our favorite pieces from the collection is this jacket that’s a super stretchy, water-resistant take on the flannel.

Buy Now

Take Pendleton’s knack for timeless wool design and work it into The North Face’s signature outerwear and you have a brand new, limited edition collection that looks as good as it performs. The two brands worked together on everything from slippers to hats, but we like this puffy vest the best.

Buy Now

9 Things Kids Should Know About Getting Lost

Spend enough time in the backcountry and you’re bound to have a scare, as our writer recently discovered. Here’s how to teach kids what to do when that happens.

It was a beautiful afternoon for a walk in the woods: cloudless and 70 degrees with a light breeze. My husband, Steve, our two daughters, and I were hiking three miles up Cave Creek Trail to a series of small caves in the Pecos Wilderness, an hour east of Santa Fe. The ponderosa pines gave off a sweet butterscotch scent of sap, the creek was running high and fast, and the brown trout were biting in the calm eddies along the bank. Steve brought his fly rod and every few minutes ducked off the trail to sneak in a cast or two. Then he’d lope along and rejoin us.

We had reached the caves and were doubling back to our car when we realized we hadn’t seen Steve for 15 minutes, since he’d stopped at a small pool and pulled out a brown trout no longer than his index finger. The girls were busy trying to catch butterflies in their bare hands, and it was too pretty to rush, so we strolled along, expecting him to catch up.

At the junction with the Dockwiller Trail, Steve still hadn’t appeared, so we sat down on a log to wait. Surely he’d catch up. Several minutes passed, then several minutes more. The edge of something uncomfortable began to press into my mind, not worry exactly, but awareness—of time passing, of the empty trail, of silence.

“Let’s head down to the car. I know he’ll catch up,” I told the girls confidently.

We hiked for a minute or two, and then my six-year-old began to whimper. “Where’s Daddy? I don’t want to leave Daddy.”

“Oh, he’s coming. I bet he just lost track of time while he was fishing. You know how he does that,” I said, feigning exasperation to distract her.

We kept walking downhill, and she kept whimpering. “I want Daddy.”

I hesitated. It had been 25 minutes. The creek was running high, choked with downed logs and strainers. I allowed myself a single thought: What if he’d slipped and fallen?

Now I was trying to keep my voice light but emphatic. “He’ll catch up.”

Now Maisy was crying. A picture popped into my brain: Steve, facedown in the creek.

I stopped and spun on my heels. “C’mon girls!”

Now we were running back up the trail, away from our car, hollering for Steve at the top of our lungs.

Steve and I spend a fair bit of time exploring the backcountry with our daughters. We’ve backpacked, hiked fourteeners with them on our backs, ventured out on countless day hikes on trails both familiar and new. I always thought that if we kept our girls within sight, no one would get lost.

I was wrong.


We must have run uphill for three-quarters of a mile, my mind racing through scenarios. If Steve had fallen and gotten hurt, he’d have been swept downstream. The creek was three feet deep, swift but shallow and no more than five feet across. My rational brain knew he was probably OK, just obsessively fishing as usual, but it was strange that he still hadn’t appeared, and I didn’t want to leave him if he needed help.

I focused on staying calm for the girls while moving fast together. We had plenty of daylight left; the weather was fine; we were close to the car (though Steve had the keys). I had a quart of water in my pack but didn’t want to stop to drink. Behind me, the girls had stopped crying and were fast on my heels. We ran to the spot where he’d been fishing, scanning the river. No sign. I figured if we turned around and went back the same way, we’d have to run into him, probably coming back up the trail to find us. There was no reason to yell; the rush of the river would surely drown out our voices.

We turned around, and I slowed to a walk, reasoning out loud to the girls. “He must have followed the river, off-trail. I bet he’s below us. He knows where the car is and will come find us. We’re not lost.” Inside I was thinking, if he’s not at the trailhead, what then? My cellphone was dead, and there was no reception in the canyon.

Then, there he was, rounding a corner and coming toward us. Steve put his hands in the air: Where were you? The girls ran to him, squealing with relief. He was fine, of course. He’d followed the creek through the canyon, veering off the trail for a few hundred yards, then rejoined it and tried to catch up. But by then we’d backtracked and were above him. When Steve didn’t find us, he went to the car, then hiked back up on the trail. A classic case of miscommunication. Make that no communication.

Later, over pizza, we talked about our confusion. Steve hadn’t been lost even for a second, and yet I realized we’d made a classic error: The trail had seemed so straightforward, and our comfort in the backcountry so assumed, that we hadn’t agreed on a plan. We hadn’t known what to do when we became separated. And what would we do if one of us did get lost? To find out, I checked in with Sara DeLucia, family program manager at the Appalachian Mountain Club for commonsense strategies for staying found this summer.


#1. Prevention Is Key

Set expectations, and make sure everyone knows the plan and route before you go. Even if it’s a trail you hike all the time, review it in detail as a group: “It’s an out-and-back hike. We’re hiking to ____ place and turning around and coming back to the car.” Even kids as young as five are capable of understanding a general route if they know it in advance. At least one adult should carry a map. Point out your route to the kids before you leave the parking lot.

#2. Communicate Goals and Intentions

If one of you wants to fish while the others hike, or run while the others climb, figure out where and when to meet in the event that someone gets sidetracked. Agree that you’ll all stay on the trail, or if you plan on going off-trail, choose a place to meet, either at the car or a junction. Whatever the scenario, discuss it in advance so everyone’s clear.

#3. Stay Together

This one’s obvious, but keep children within visual or voice range at all times to avoid getting separated and in the event that you encounter wildlife.

#4. Bring the Right Gear

Outfit every kid with their own pack, including water, snacks, extra clothing, a trash bag, and a whistle in case of emergency. Teach them to blow it loudly three times in a row if they become separated or need help, waiting 30 seconds between the next set of whistles to hear if someone’s calling back.

#5. Wait at Every Trail Crossing

Remind everyone in the party to wait and regroup at every trail junction, water crossing, or challenging feature. This gives you the chance to assess risk as a family and decide whether it’s safe to go on. Seeing the caves up close required us to shimmy across the creek on a log, which did not thrill me until we took a closer look and talked about the consequences of falling off and what kind of exposure we would risk if we did. The creek was shallow and unobstructed; the biggest risk was getting wet on a warm day two miles from the car. We decided it was not a big deal and crossed it.

#6. Stay on the Trail

This is especially true for kids, and especially if they’re not with an adult. It’s easy for kids to become so focused on the grasshopper they’re chasing that they get disoriented and lose track of the trail, even if they’ve wandered only a few yards away. Take time at the beginning of the hike to become familiar with the blazes or other trail markers on your route.

#7. Stay Calm

When Maisy first got upset, I let her tears sway me and jumped to the worst-case scenario. In hindsight, I realize I was probably hungry, tired, and not thinking clearly. I’d brought ample snacks for the girls but not for me—dumb mistake.

#8. Stop and Stay Put

Emphasize the importance of staying put if a child finds themselves lost. They can find a tree or rock to cuddle up next to. Blow the whistle while staying in one place. Put on or display their brightest-color clothing. If they are getting cold or it’s raining, they can make a hole in the trash bag and put their head through it to keep themselves dry and warm. Keep blowing the whistle, making sure to pause to hear if anyone’s calling back. Wait for help to arrive.

#9. If Your Kid Is Missing, Call for Help

Immediately. If you have cell reception, you can call as soon as you discover your child missing. If you don’t, you can send an adult in your party to the nearest location with cell reception, usually on higher ground.

Why Are Runners Obsessed with the Pain Cave?

It’s within this cavern of discomfort where we take stock of our courage—and figure out what we’re made of

The most painful race I have ever experienced was my first attempt at an ultramarathon, in 2012. Way Too Cool seemed like a soft transition into ultrarunning: The famous race is a 50K, only five miles farther than a marathon. And while the Way Too Cool course is all on trails of the Sierra Nevada foothills, the route is not especially brutal. Starting just east of Auburn, California, it winds down dirt fire roads to the banks of the American River, before rolling back toward the finish along forested ravines and canyons.

For the first couple hours, things seemed fine. I was running quickly, toward the front of the pack. But as fatigue mounted in my legs, I began to have catastrophic energy issues. It happened fast—as if a plug had been pulled and my strength bled out, like water draining from a sink. “Hold it together,” I told myself, as I vomited up my pre-race breakfast. Other runners started moving past me, some giving words of encouragement. But I hardly noticed. I blocked out the scenery and the other competitors, focusing on keeping my legs in motion. I had entered the pain cave.

Pain is perhaps the most common experience in competitive distance running. If you want to achieve your best performances, you must be willing to suffer. In trying to podium or snag a personal best, your own physiology will fight against you. Your muscles ache, the lactic acid builds, and you slip into oxygen debt. So why do it? Why do runners willingly enter the pain cave?

The phrase itself—“pain cave”—has proliferated among runners and ultramarathoners, hinting at how much the experience of suffering defines the sport. Jim Walmsley famously missed a turn at Western States last year because, in his own words, “I was very much in the pain cave.” Ensconced in physical distress, he ran miles off course, ending what might have been a record-setting day. But Walmsley didn’t invent the phrase. When Timothy Olson won Western States in 2012, professional ultrarunner Dylan Bowman recalled that Olson “entered the pain cave to get through it and blew us all away.” Outdoor industry companies are now following suit. In a tweet this spring, The North Face marketed its apparel as helping runners “weather the triumph and the pain cave.” Sports magazines hawk gear to let you turn your basement into “the perfect pain cave for your budget.” Caverns of discomfort are seemingly everywhere.

Ultramarathoning does not hold a monopoly on pain—running’s subdisciplines are unified through deep descents into lactic agony. Racing a 5K is like taking a bath in discomfort. A well-paced half marathon feels like holding your hand in a campfire. The end of a marathon is particularly awful—the last 10 kilometers almost a deconstruction of the self.

This is why the metaphor of the cave is so very apt. When we hurt, the outside world becomes bounded and excluded, and we descend into a chasm of ourselves. And when things go especially pear-shaped because of a bonk or bad pacing, the contours of the pain cave turn jagged and sharp.

After years of subjecting myself to this masochism, my sense is that runners gravitate toward painful activities because they provide us with opportunities for knowledge. We think pain will reveal something, some evidence of value or commitment to self-improvement. We believe, for some reason, that arbitrary painful challenges will provide answers: Who’s the best? Have I improved? Am I tough enough? What am I doing with my life? In other words, we want to know the content of our character.

This is perhaps why the peculiar celebration of pain has always permeated distance running’s culture. We find something deep and metaphorical about the idea of running through pain, as if the endurance of discomfort contains meaning beyond angry nerve endings. We cherish stories like the iconic 1982 Duel in the Sun between Alberto Salazar and Dick Beardsley at the Boston Marathon, a pyrrhic experience between two athletes at their physical peak that neither came close to matching again in their lives. We fetishize the agonies of the fictional Quenton Cassidy, who runs 60 quarter-mile intervals in Once a Runner and pisses blood afterward.

Pain forces us to confront disruptive, awful, and occasionally inspiring realities of the world around us. The pain cave is a place where we take stock of our courage and ask ourselves how much we are willing to give for the goals we’ve laid out. And that, I think, is why we willingly descend into it.

But such armchair philosophy was far from my mind on the trails of Way Too Cool in 2012. Over the last eight miles, I ran ragged in a state of physiological deterioration. As I lifted my body up the course’s steep climb near mile 26, the discomfort was so acute I could almost taste it. “Holy cow,” I thought as I staggered up the slope like a drunken bear. “This really hurts.” Friendly volunteers cheered along the trailside, but they seemed muted and muffled as I lurched by in my cavern of physical distress. My pace melted into a crawl. “What is it, exactly, that I am trying to accomplish here?” I mumbled to myself. “Something is totally off with my body. I really should stop.” I contemplated sitting down on the trailside. Maybe I could get a ride to the finish.

Then, amid the turmoil of the cave, some part of me quietly pointed out, “But if you stop, you will never know if you could have finished today. Aren’t you curious?” I knew this was circular reasoning: I would only know I could finish the race by finishing it. But I did want to know.

An agonizing hour later, I crossed the finish line, tottering through the corral like an overloaded boat about to capsize. I sat down and stared at the small bit of ground between my shoes. I felt fantastically awful. Somebody handed me a cupcake: “Way to tough it out, bro.” After a moment, I staggered off, cupcake in hand, to look for my car. I had learned in the pain cave that I could finish an ultra, and I knew I’d be back again soon.

The Inextricable Tie Between Eating Disorders and Endurance Athletes

Climbers, cyclists, runners, and all kinds of other athletes—both men and women—are starting to speak out about disordered eating in their communities

Facebook Icon

Twitter Icon

sms

email

Looking back on her early days in her sport, professional climber Angie Payne, 32, is struck by how twisted her definition of health once was. She started climbing at age 11 and quickly became, in her words, “obsessed”: she loved the feeling that when she got on the wall, her body became graceful and intuitive in a way she’d never experienced before—that some part of her naturally understood what to do. She had talent. She was also a skinny kid, which helps in a sport that puts the strength of your muscles in direct ratio to the body mass they have to haul toward the sky.

Payne stayed naturally thin when she hit puberty, even though her diet growing up in Cincinnati, Ohio, consisted mostly of “sugar, butter, and some veggies here and there.” In her mid-teens, she started thinking about eating healthier—not so much because she wanted to lose weight, but because it made her feel like she was getting serious about climbing, pushing her Midwestern adolescent life in the direction of her lofty athletic dreams. “I remember the first thing I did was that I started eating a lot more salad,” says Payne. “Salad in my family was iceberg lettuce with sugar dressing and a lot of croutons.” Before long, she says, “I’d come home from the gym, and all I’d eat after climbing the whole night was a salad” with “no protein, nothing.” In her mind, salad equated to healthy, but looking back, she says, “Really, that was the beginning.”

After graduating from high school, Payne moved to Boulder, Colorado, enrolled in college to appease her parents, and devoted herself to competitive climbing. On her own for the first time, she was lonely and depressed—feelings she channeled into not only her training but also an increasingly rigid diet. The list of foods she deemed “healthy” shrank and shrank. Breakfast became a handful of granola, lunch a chicken breast, dinner a salad. She avoided scales—the moment she started quantifying her weight loss, some part of her felt she’d have to admit she had a problem. But she could feel the changes in the body: Her skin dried out, and her hair felt like straw. She stopped getting her period. But on the climbing wall, her newfound lightness was “addicting,” she says. She started winning one national competition after another. She remembers one day when she tried a difficult move on crimps—small holds that the climber can grasp only with her fingertips—and felt like she was “just flowing over the boulder,” weightless.

Payne wanted to lose weight to win, but once her eating disorder took hold, winning ceased to make her happy. Instead, it became the only thing standing between her and the emotional tailspin that came with a loss. She felt stuck: If she acknowledged she had a problem, she would have to put on weight, and if she gained any weight, she was convinced she’d lose her edge in competitions. The thought of losing filled her with despair.

One night at her parents’ house, in the spring of 2004, Payne stepped on a scale for the first time in months and learned that she weighed less than 100 pounds, down from about 120 at the beginning of the school year. “I remember looking in the mirror,” she says. She took in the dramatic changes to her body. She’d never imagined that she’d lost so much weight. “I remember thinking, ‘Oh my god, this is really, really unhealthy.’”

(Courtesy Angie Payne)


Payne would eventually be diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, but only after she hid her eating disorder for the better part of a year, even, to some extent, from herself. In the world of professional climbing—and, more generally, across endurance sports—Payne’s obsession with eating “perfectly” didn’t look as abnormal as it should. The National Association of Anorexia Nervosa and Associated Disorders estimates that about 30 million Americans, or about 10 percent of the population, suffer from eating disorders such as anorexia and bulimia, and many more exhibit signs of disordered eating. The incidence is believed to be slowly rising.

Efforts to measure the prevalence of eating disorders among athletes have returned varying results, but it’s generally accepted that the rate is higher than in the general population. One study of elite athletes in Norway found that 13.5 percent had eating disorders, including 9 percent of male endurance athletes and 24 percent of female athletes. Athletes are under the same pressures as everyone else to conform to a societal standard of thinness and beauty, but they also contend with their own set of risks, according to Ron Thompson, a specialist who has consulted on the topic of eating disorders with the NCAA and the International Olympic Committee Medical Commission (IOCMC). Those triggers turn out to be the same traits we admire in athletes, the mental assets that allow the human body to perform seemingly superhuman feats. For example, “How many people can run several miles after not having eaten for several days?” Thompson asks. For clinicians like Thompson, the battle begins with making coaches see these behaviors as dangerous, rather than as the essence of an athlete’s competitive edge.

Slowly, the world of endurance sports has begun to reckon with these dangers. As recently as the 1980s and 1990s, “anorexia wasn’t a term that was used very much,” says former elite runner Lize Brittin, who nearly lost her life to the disorder. “I didn’t know what I had.” Women runners, including Brittin, were among the earliest endurance athletes to speak openly about their struggles. Experts and advocates are currently working to expand the perception of who suffers from eating disorders. For years, clinicians focused on the female athlete triad, the idea that disordered eating is one of an interrelated set of problems, along with amenorrhea—when a woman ceases to get her period—and osteoporosis, both of which can result from malnutrition. This framework left no room for male athletes or for many of the worst consequences that can come from eating disorders, such as compromised immunity, heart problems, or organ failure. In 2014, the IOC replaced the term “female athlete triad” in its official statements with the more inclusive term “relative energy deficiency in sport (RED-S)”; in 2015, the NCAA followed suit.

Today, the conversation about eating disorders in endurance sports increasingly includes men’s voices as well as women’s and the testimony of swimmers, cyclists, skiers, and climbers in addition to runners. Former Olympic cyclist Mara Abbott established herself as one of the most prominent voices on the issue last summer. Nordic skier Hannah Halvorsen recruited other women in her sport to make a video about their struggles with body image. In the past year, moving personal essays about the topic from triathlete Jesse Thomas, runner Lauren Fleshman, and rower Meghan O’Leary have made waves online. Confronting this issue may require recognizing that the whatever-it-takes mentality and its attendant dangers are an inextricable part of elite endurance sports. “Being a professional athlete isn’t actually a super-healthy thing to do,” says Abbott. From training to nutrition, “It’s always about managing stresses—about how much a body can withstand.”


(Paolo Cocco/AFP/Getty Images)

One of the first things Tyler Hamilton learned on day one of his career as a professional cyclist was that he needed to lose weight. It was 1995, and he’d just touched down in the Barcelona airport, having signed a contract with U.S. Postal Service. When the team director picked him up, “He made fun of my baby fat straightaway,” Hamilton recalls. “I was like, ‘What’s this about? I’m super skinny!’ I had no idea.”

While female athletes, like women in general, are inculcated all their lives with the importance of thinness, male athletes are also bombarded with messages about their bodies. Some of the cyclists and runners I interviewed—both men and women—told me they think coaches and directors on women’s teams have grown more attuned to the issue, and, in many cases, are more careful with what they say about an athlete’s weight or eating, while men’s coaches are years behind.

Early in his career, Hamilton thought of himself as a “big engine”—sure, he had bulkier muscles than some of his beanpole teammates, but that’s what powered him to victory in his best stage: the time trial. But after a few years of feeling his team’s nutritionists “eyeballing me every time I went up to get a cookie,” and of hearing from coaches and more seasoned cyclists that he could really be a contender if he shed a few pounds, Hamilton took the advice to heart. “When I lost weight, I basically learned to climb,” he told me. “There was a time”—around 2003, when he placed fourth in the Tour de France—“when I was one of the best climbers in the world.”

Every spring and summer, the 5'8" Hamilton would work to whittle himself down to about 130 pounds. “The three months before the Tour were hell to get there,” he says. He’d bike for six or seven hours, come home famished, and chug a Diet Coke as fast as he could. A Diet Coke, and maybe an apple, and “you go from ravenous to ‘okay, maybe I can go another hour now.’” Once, after a hard training ride, Hamilton’s director gave him a handful of sleeping pills to help him “make it until dinner” without eating. The message was, “If you make it through the night, even better.”

Hamilton describes these patterns as an eating disorder, though he was never technically diagnosed with one. At the same time, he believes achieving a skeletal physique did make him a better cyclist. Weight is only one of many factors in an athlete’s performance. But in races that are won and lost by a fraction of a second—not only in cycling, but also in running, swimming, and skiing—athletes who fantasize about the perfect ratio between power and leanness usually find that the latter is easier to quantify and control.

When Jesse Thomas, an elite triathlete, ran for Stanford as a college student, every guy on his team seemed to want to lose weight. He says, “We had this joke: ‘Oh man, I’m so hungry I’m going to go take a nap.’ To a certain extent, maybe that made me feel better, like, ‘It’s not that big a deal. Everyone’s doing it.’” Thomas struggled with injuries throughout his college running career but never connected his body’s breakdowns with his efforts to feed it as little as possible. Though he was never diagnosed, Thomas now considers his behavior typical of bulimia nervosa: He imposed a rigid diet on himself, mentally trying to “clamp down clamp down clamp down,” he says, until “every once and a while, I would crack and binge eat a ton, usually the stuff I was depriving myself of”—sugars and fat, cookies and ice cream. Then, Thomas says, he would purge by starving himself for the next 24 to 36 hours, sometimes adding extra runs until he had worked his way back to a calorie deficit.

Though eating disorders are almost definitely more prevalent among women, they are thought to be underdiagnosed among men. Guy East, a cyclist who struggled with anorexia and bulimia, said that on his teams, the mentality was, “We’re men, we don’t have any problems.” Even though East knew many of his friends were going through the same thing as he was, the unstated rule was, “You can’t discuss it.”


The pressure to lose weight at all costs persists because many athletes who do so get faster—sometimes much faster—for a season or two. Usually, it doesn’t take long for these benefits to burn themselves out, but the devastating long-term consequences of an eating disorder can take years, or even decades, to manifest completely.

Lauren Fleshman, a former U.S. track and field champion, told me that every season she ran college cross-country, “there was always somebody that came seemingly out of nowhere and would win or podium, and then you’d never hear for them again.” For a brief window, before the inevitable breakdown, these young women were so fleet-footed that Fleshman used to deride eating disorders as a form of cheating. “Now I’ve lived long enough to see that those short-term moments of success came at a great cost,” she says.

For women, the clearest sign that an eating disorder has grown severe is usually amenorrhea—a warning that a lack of fat has caused the body to stop producing estrogen. Many coaches still see amenorrhea as “par for course,” or even as a natural sign that an athlete is training hard, according to Brittin, who is the co-author of a forthcoming book about training practices called Young Runners at the Top. In fact, amenorrhea is a sign of what can quickly become irreversible damage, both to a woman’s reproductive system and to her bones: Estrogen plays a key role in regulating bone density, and shutting down a woman’s period, and with it her body’s supply of the hormone, during the developmentally crucial years of adolescence and early adulthood can result in osteoporosis later in life. In both men and women, this link between fat reserves, estrogen, and bone density also puts disordered eaters at high risk for stress fractures and other injuries.

A severe eating disorder can eventually cause organ failure; this is the most common cause of death for people with anorexia, according to Thompson. The number two cause, he says, is suicide. Eating disorders can be rooted in depression, anxiety, and other mental health problems or can tighten the choke hold of those conditions. For athletes, eating disorders are often desperate attempts to excel at the sports that comprise their entire lives and form the basis of their identities. East came up in the sport on a youth cycling team where he and his peers would compare how many ribs they could count or how many veins they could see in their legs. His team was “my family,” says East. “That’s where I got my values from,” and that culture prized two things, thinness and winning, which became synonymous in many riders’ heads. East’s bulimia worsened with his flagging performance, a vicious cycle that eventually found him throwing up almost every day. Trying to lose more weight became “my last hope,” he says. “I’d put all my eggs in this basket of being a professional cyclist, and if I wasn’t a cyclist, I didn’t know what I was going to do.” Finally, he did the only thing he could think of: quit not only his sport, but his whole life. He sold his belongings, took off on an around-the-world trip, “grew my hair past my shoulders, looked for what my purpose was.” It would be about two years before he found his way back to cycling.

Thomas also quit racing at the end of college; he was tired of getting hurt all the time. He spent five years working at a startup in San Francisco. Thomas and Fleshman, who had dated on and off in college, got married. By the time he started getting into triathlons, Thomas felt very distant from the person who starved himself until he broke and gorged on sweets in a dissociative haze. As he says, “I no longer had 100 percent of my identity and self-worth wrapped into my performance as an athlete.”

(Jeff Brockmeyer/Red Bull Content)


Payne can still remember how light she felt on her fingertips—but also how weak she was in the depths of her eating disorder. In the years since, she’s developed a far more powerful climbing style, and the sport itself has also evolved to reward, and even require, more so-called “dynamic movements”—long leaps between handholds and other moves that force climbers to generate momentum. “My body wouldn’t be capable of climbing in the way I do now if I was 20 pounds lighter,” Payne says. “I need this muscle. I need this weight. I need the body I have now to do the things I do with it.”

For many athletes, recovery from eating disorders is about seeking equilibrium, even if it may look crude at first. As she began trying to address her eating disorder, cyclist Mara Abbott found herself stressing about whether she was “perfectly” executing her recovery plan. Silencing those voices meant “being soft enough with myself to say, ‘It’s okay still have these triggers,’ but hard enough with myself to say, ‘It doesn’t matter how you do it. You have to eat enough to sustain yourself as an athlete and a person,’” Abbott says. It was fine to get anxious and not be able to eat enough at dinner, for example—as long as she went back to her room and made up for it in cereal.

The benefits of recovery are cognitive as well as physical. Expending energy counting calories—or trying, in Thomas’ words, to “clamp down” on cravings and hunger pangs—saps an athlete’s mental toughness. “If you want to be truly elite, you need—some people call it cockiness—but it’s confidence,” says Fleshman. “If you’re spending all your time thinking about nutrition and body image, that’s space that isn’t going to being mentally strong.”

East told me that he races faster now than he did when he was 30 pounds lighter and training twice as much. “When I go to a race, I’m excited to be there, so I perform well,” he says simply. “I used to hate it. Now I want to do it.”

For climber Emily Harrington, the number she saw when she stepped on the scale in the morning used to make or break her day. “Everything had to be controlled, and everything had to be perfect,” Harrington says, and if it wasn’t—if she made one slipup over lunch, one mistake during a climb—then “I couldn’t let go of all those little things enough to actually perform.” Letting go in her life has helped Harrington relax in her climbing, too, making room for a kind of soft focus that allows her body’s natural intelligence to take over. Now, she says, “most often it’s when something is going wrong, or the conditions are bad, that I allow myself to relax enough to be successful.” Harrington has come to love the feeling of “just letting things happen, letting the body move, letting it do the things you know how to do.”

Payne still struggles with a tendency to obsess over her weight, to wonder if she’s carrying just a little extra muscle. When those thoughts run through her mind, “I force myself to have the beer,” she says, “to eat a cupcake, enjoy myself a little bit.” It puts something between her and those old demons—a reminder that she doesn’t define “health” in the same way anymore.

Remembering Bruce Brown, Director of The Endless Summer

>

“Summer means many different things to different people,” narrates Bruce Brown at the beginning of the 1963 cult classic The Endless Summer, the most famous surf movie ever made. Brown, one of the first and most widely known surf film makers, passed away on Sunday at the age of 80, in his home.

Ostensibly a tale of two surfers chasing perfect waves, The Endless Summer is better understood as the original outdoor-sports lifestyle fantasy, the Dead Sea scrolls upon which our entire climbing/surfing/skiing road-trip religion was founded. With Brown narrating in a sun-saturated and cracker-jack American patter, the film opens with a montage/primer on the sport of surfing, just to let viewers know how much fun those crazy kids are having on the coast. Then it follows clean-cut longboarders Mike Hynson and Robert August around the world to Senegal, Ghana, South Africa, Australia, Tahiti, New Zealand, and Hawaii.

Brown was a fledgling surf filmmaker when he made The Endless Summer for $50,000. He initially screened the film, in 1964, the same way everybody screened surf films in those days, driving up and down the west coast booking auditoriums and church halls, selling tickets, playing records, and narrating live. All by himself. After two years of that, Brown was so convinced The Endless Summer could sell to a broader audience—and so frustrated with movie distributors telling him it couldn’t play inland—that he rented the Sunset Theater in Wichita, Kansas, for two weeks. The place sold out, so Brown pulled the same trick at a theater in New York City and landed himself a theatrical distribution deal. Newsweek soon called The Endless Summer one of the ten best films of 1966, Time magazine called Brown the "Bergman of the boards,” and the film grossed $30 million worldwide. 

As Matt Warshaw writes in The History of Surfing, the actual wave-riding in The Endless Summer was badly outdated almost as soon as middle-American audiences saw it. Surfboards had gotten much shorter in the intervening three years, and surfers were already making the switch from old-school longboard technique to modern slashing-and-carving. Same for the personal style of the surfers themselves, whose buzzed hair and propensity to wear suits and ties on airplanes looked downright square as early as 1967. So it’s a testament to the power of Brown’s vision that The Endless Summer still became a one-film culture industry, a touchstone for every outdoor-sports travel documentary from the legendary 1968 Mountain of Storms, in which North-Face founder Doug Tompkins and Patagonia-founder Yvon Chouinard drove a VW bus to South America surfing and skiing and climbing along the way, to the spellbinding new Given, about Aamion and Daize Goodwin’s global surf travels with their beautiful kids. 

Bruce Brown was born on December 1, 1937, in San Francisco. He lived in Oakland until age nine, then moved with his family to Long Beach. He started surfing at eleven and saw early surf movies at the local Elk’s Club. He joined the Navy out of high school, served on a submarine, and shot his first hobby film with an 8mm camera while stationed in Honolulu in 1955. After he was discharged, Brown came back to California and went to Long Beach City College, but dropped out to work as a lifeguard.

The first big surfing boom, touched off by the bestselling book and Hollywood movie Gidget, was just getting rolling when Brown landed a job at Dale Velzy’s surf shop in Manhattan Beach, California. Velzy saw Brown’s home surf movies and started screening them for paying customers, charging 25 cents admission. Soon, they’d negotiated a deal for Velzy to bankroll Brown on a trip back to Hawaii, with funding for a proper movie camera, 50 rolls of film, six plane tickets, and Brown’s living expenses. The result was Brown’s first feature-length documentary, Slippery When Wet. Four more followed, at a pace of one per year: Surf Crazy (1959), Barefoot Adventure (1960), Surfing Hollow Days (1961), and Waterlogged (1962)

“When Bruce made The Endless Summer, in 1963,” says Warshaw, “it looked like some obscure guy stepped up to the plate and hit a homer, but the truth is he’d been doing rough drafts for years. In all those earlier movies, you can see him working out camera angles and that patter and voice.”

After the runaway success of The Endless Summer, Brown partnered with Steve McQueen to make a documentary about his other big love, off-road motorcycle-racing. The resulting documentary, On Any Sunday (1971), was nominated for a 1972 Academy Award. Brown spent most of the next two decades riding motorcycles, fishing commercially with his own swordfish boat, surfing, and racing rally cars with his wife, Pat. In 1994, Brown came out of semi-retirement to make The Endless Summer 2 with his son, Dana, whose Step Into Liquid (2003) was the fifth-highest grossing sports documentary ever. The Endless Summer 2 never matched the culture-changing power of the original but it was an awfully good time—both to watch and to film. Robert “Wingnut” Weaver, one of the surfer stars of that film, recalls painful days and creative arguments between Brown and his director of photography. “But every morning,” says Weaver, “there was a smile and a cigarette and a cup of coffee and off we went.”

Brown was also loyal to those he cared about. Weaver, who lives in Santa Cruz, California, saw him a dozen times a year in the last decade of Brown’s life. “He’s halfway between my house and where my mom lives in Newport, so we had a standing deal where I’d stop in and make dinner on the way south, and sleep over, and he’d make dinner on the way north,” says Weaver. Brown lived in a canyon off the Coast Highway near Santa Barbara. Weaver recalls the phone ringing one evening, and Brown looking out the window at a car stopped in the middle of the highway with lights blinking. It was a friend, dropping a bag of live lobsters for Brown on the median strip; Weaver had to dash through traffic to collect.  

Near the end of Brown’s life, in a joint interview with Dana, Brown talked about his surfing buddies from the 1950s, how John Severson launched Surfer magazine, Hobie Alter made surfboards and boogie boards, and Brown himself took to making movies. “We just tried to figure out something to do to stay at the beach,” said Brown. 

By that measure—and almost every other measure imaginable—Brown’s life was a soaring success. Not only did he live near the water, he kept surfing well into his early 70s. “Bruce liked going with me,” says Weaver, “because after every wave he rode, I’d catch a wave myself and paddle over and find him and let him grab my ankle leash. Then I’d tow him back out for another. Bruce really lived his life in the best possible fantasy world he could’ve had. I don’t think he would’ve changed a thing.” 

A Guide for Politicians Who Want to Look Outdoorsy

>

Look guys, I get it. Virtually every normal American loves the outdoors. There are as many visitors to National Parks as there are U.S. citizens. The outdoor-recreation industry is the third largest in the nation. So far as demographics go, we’re a way bigger voting block than rich people, old people, or even xenophobes. So you want our vote.

But man, you go about pretending to be one of us in all the wrong ways. Just take Roy Moore, who rode a horse to the polls in Tuesday's special election for the Alabama Senate seat. Horse Twitter promptly and viciously came after him for his poor form. He lost the race.

With other campaigns already ramping up for the mid-terms, let’s try and help the politicians who remain in the running. 

BG16Q_oQilI

https://twitter.com/Molly_Kats/status/940662427083001862

https://twitter.com/ohkayewhatever/status/940646343902711808

https://twitter.com/rialto55/status/940670512971304960

https://twitter.com/effiedog/status/939709826225012737

7HeWM_Qiit

https://twitter.com/Acera_Quarles/status/825189006870605824

https://twitter.com/hatchflymag/status/935553370097676288

https://twitter.com/outsidemagazine/status/938383775423135744

https://twitter.com/FlyFishReport/status/940629913408868352

https://twitter.com/LByock/status/940983007342616576

https://twitter.com/timothy_stanley/status/208228945580138496

https://twitter.com/Gizmodo/status/661916572513083392

https://twitter.com/shirtlessobama/status/444967933173698563

https://twitter.com/Sue3805m/status/895027913665413120

kLzr0KKX8L

https://twitter.com/TomthunkitsMind/status/930941614402473984

BVq7WMdDDd5

https://twitter.com/Young_Seneca/status/795835817067429888

https://twitter.com/BryanAGraham/status/911397671553732608

https://twitter.com/NFLprguy/status/91158008414177280

Bcp-Y8EBtY7

https://twitter.com/people/status/720218351910391808

https://twitter.com/LZorad/status/932721801968353280

https://twitter.com/PostGraphics/status/814240390886916096

https://twitter.com/potus44/status/723568187447500800

https://twitter.com/aef218/status/940894828484808705

https://twitter.com/samsondenver/status/934227630613716992

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/265496271794630656

https://twitter.com/PostGraphics/status/938860430528798720

https://twitter.com/FoAorg/status/927980058278551552

https://twitter.com/SecretaryZinke/status/937774615509614594

https://twitter.com/NatResources/status/939236821971734530

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/938422792080457731

Op-Ed: Zinke Betrayed the Tribal Nations

>

To heal from within, the Hopi, Navajo, Ute Indian Tribe, the Pueblo of Zuni, and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe all put past grievances aside to seek a common goal: Protect the Bears Ears region in southeastern Utah.

Healing was at the center of the movement: to preserve and advocate for continued access to the indigenous homelands of our ancestors, the lands that tie their stories of heritage to ours. The land, water, air, animals, and people are what our elders requested the five tribes to support with prayers and ceremony. They’re what elected tribal leaders sought to protect with law. The traditional and scientific knowledge of the region validated this importance. With each trip we made to Washington, D.C., to ask the federal government to protect this land, a prayer was offered.

On December 28, 2016, former President Barack Obama designated 1.35 million acres as the Bears Ears National Monument. The designation promised to protect the site’s breathtaking beauty and precious ecosystems. It also reassured us that our historical and spiritual connection to this landscape would be preserved for all time. The decision made on that historic day represented a successful transformation of the relationship between the U.S. and tribal governments. It was the first tribal-led push for a national monument. It had taken years. It was also the first time a group of tribal nations would share in the oversight of land that once belonged to them, establishing a commission where traditional knowledge would become a strong presence in management plans.

It is disturbing then to imagine that one day—December 4, 2017—could profoundly set back the historical, deep healing between the five tribes and the federal government. The five tribes requested use of the Antiquities Act as a solution for protection instead of waiting for a solution to be prescribed to them, as had been done with reservation boundaries in the past.

Now that the boundaries of Bears Ears will be reduced by more than 80 percent, the risk of new land leases and permits for mining oil and gas will rise. In the name of economic development, protection of the land will be rolled back. The fragile ecosystems and water supplies will be in jeopardy, and, as many know, water is precious in the West. We have officially entered into a time that our ancestors and elders spoke of—of betrayal and broken promises.

The time, energy, and resources invested while working alongside President Obama’s administration was an amazing experience. Under the Trump administration, hope turned to frustration. The open and clear conversations from our governments to the White House and to the Department of Interior disappeared. They returned to the old ways of tribes being disregarded and oppressed. Yesterday, we were flooded with hundreds of years of memories.

When Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke visited Utah this summer, the five tribes had to fight for just one hour of his time. What happened to the respect of the indigenous sovereign voices? The sovereign voice that is written into the U.S. Constitution? He did not listen to us because he did not want to hear what we had to say. Instead, he gave his ear to representatives of the energy industry.

Twenty-seven million acres of BLM land are currently under lease to oil and gas companies in the United States—more than half are sitting idle. Twenty years of coal reserves are under lease on public lands. Interior Secretary Zinke was guided through the Bears Ears region by anti-monument advocates, engaging almost exclusively with energy industry representatives. It is heartbreaking to know that the final resting places of our ancestors, preservation of Puebloan structures, the fragile ecological systems, and the stories written on the land and canyon walls will be auctioned off for destruction and disregarded for the sake of industrial development.

The indigenous people of the United States have always held a strong relationship with the land. Our land is part of our identity, language, culture, and ceremony. Our healers and medicine people collected medicinal herbs and conducted ceremonies for the sick and injured out on the landscape. Our mothers and grandmothers buried the umbilical cords of our babies in the land. We bathed our babies in the snow so they will be resilient and strong-spirited. We never owned any aspect of the land; ownership and possession was a learned behavior after the coming of the nonindigenous people. We live in relationship with our surroundings and the elements, in prayer and everyday living. We are merely humans here to care for our families and the land, and to prepare for the next seven generations.

Regina Lopez-Whiteskunk is a former co-chairwoman of the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition and a former tribal leader of the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe.