Even Vagabonds Need a Home

Life on the road means freedom from daily schedules. But it’s nice to have familiar places to look forward to every year.

Compared to the metronomic regularity of typical American life—6:30 a.m. wakeup, 8:30 a.m. office, Tuesdays and Thursdays yoga, two-day weekends, Saturday at the local pub—Jen’s and my existence unfolds in an unforeseeable staccato of travel and assignments. If life is a road, we are constantly driving forward to see what’s over the next hill, and in the interest of not being constantly forced to cancel everything, we add few events to the calendar more than a week or two away.

On the other hand, by virtue of chasing good weather, we’ve developed something of an annual routine, a handful of waypoints that loosely steer our travels. Catching up with bird migration at the Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge is a rite of autumn, for example, and no winter would be complete without a stay in the Sonoran Desert. I’ve come to think of these places as signposts, places and events that roughly mark time and keep us moving as sure as those cranes and geese at the Bosque. This week, I realized that Abiquiu Lake, in north-central New Mexico, is another such marker. Though we never discussed whether we’d return here this year, I knew in the back of my head that the lake campground reopened for the season on April 15, and when we approached the road to the lake a few weeks later, there wasn’t even a question that we’d make the turn.

(JJAG Media)

Probably best known for its position between Pedernal and Ghost Ranch, two New Mexico icons that defined the life and work of Georgia O’Keeffe, Abiquiu Lake is accordingly stunning. The flat mesa tops of the Jemez Mountains glide down to brick-colored sandstone cliffs and planes of red earth stippled with piñon pines. At the center of it all is that cerulean window of water. Water in the desert is life, and coming to the lake to swim and boat and fish is an affirmation. Just an hour north of Santa Fe, the place also holds special significance for Jen and me, as it delineates our wintering ground from summer. When we pass here, it means the temperatures in the desert are creeping up and the mountain snows are melting, unlocking the adventures and camping grounds ahead in the high Rockies.

I love the spontaneity of our lives—the knowledge that we can drive one hour or all day to find our next spot, or we can simply stay put; the ability to reshape our plans whenever we see a dirt road that looks compelling; those frequent mornings when I have to open Artemis’ door to remember where we are. Road life teaches you to be flexible in a way that the nine-to-five regimen cannot. At the same time, having a few waypoints, like Tucson or Abiquiu, is a counterbalance. These spots are the constellations by which we navigate, even if we pick a different path to get there every time.

Having spots to return to also cuts the isolation of the road. At Abiquiu, the camp hosts, whom we’ve seen year after year, greeted us with a big hug and invited us to sit for coffee and catch up. And since Abiquiu is so close to our previous residence, it is especially significant for the access to our social network. This year, some old friends, Aaron and Amy, drove from Santa Fe with their trailer to camp with us. Others we haven’t seen in months day-tripped up as well.

(JJAG Media)

The lake was still stinging-cold from the runoff, too frigid for waterskiing without our wetsuits, which are somewhere deep in storage. Instead, Jen and I inflated our Alpacka rafts and spent a day paddling the quiet section of the Chama River that empties into the lake. Abiquiu isn’t a mountain biking destination per se, but the more time we spend here, the more riding I discover. One day, we pedaled a new-to-me segment of the Continental Divide Trail into the high country, where inky stands of ponderosa were musky with elk. The next day, we hopped on borrowed fat bikes and traced sandy arroyos into the maze of canyon country to the south, where I know of a seldom-visited basalt arch called Window Rock. In the evenings, we cast for walleye and trout on the Chama, grilled elk from our just-replenished meat freezer in Santa Fe, and caught up with old friends under the stars.

At the end of the long weekend, Aaron, Amy, and the others returned to their lives and schedules back in town, leaving me and Jen alone. At first, I was melancholy to see them go. It had been great to have everyone together, and the quiet after their departure seemed to highlight just how solitary road life can be. But then I realized how much I appreciate places like Abiquiu, where I can return year after year. For millennia, the wind has whipped this landscape. As we push on up the road, never quite sure what’s over the next roll, it’s comforting to know that as surely as the weather will turn again in half a year, the cliffs and water and searing sun will be waiting for us here at the lake.

Garmin Edge 1030 vs. the iPhone X

Our lead bike reviewer set out to answer the question: Do you really need all the fancy riding tech, or will a smartphone suffice?

A friend recently asked why I always use a cycling computer rather than just rely on my iPhone for navigation and route recording. “Today’s iPhones are better than desktop computers a few years ago,” he said. “Why spend the money on something else?”

I’ve always felt there are lots of good reasons to use a dedicated riding computer. Mapping capabilities, especially for uploading and following a course, were always better, and the measured data (heart rate, power, cadence) via ANT+ devices made them far more useful tools for athletes. Most important, I didn’t want to put an expensive smartphone at risk in the field. Sure, a high-end Garmin is costly, but if it bounced off the bike or got waterlogged in a storm (neither of which has ever happened to me, by the way), at least I wouldn’t be losing my daily access to work and communications.

But my friend’s question got me thinking about whether advances in phones and apps have perhaps made bike computers unnecessary. So, for the past few months, I’ve been running a state-of-the-art Garmin Edge 1030 side by side with my iPhone X on pretty much every ride, including a four-day bikepacking traverse of New Mexico. Though I expected to ride away from the experiment as dead set as ever on my Garmin, the verdict wasn’t that cut and dry.

iPhone X

(JJAG Media)

The iPhone X is Apple’s top-end iPhone, with the largest screen, high-quality OLED resolution, a super-high-res camera, and advanced technology features including face recognition software and Apple Pay.

Durability
Ranking: 7/10

The new iPhone X is said to be dustproof and waterproof to three feet, and combined with an OtterBox Defender case ($50) it’s relatively shockproof, too. But the only thing that made this experiment possible was the new F3 Cycling phone mount ($60), which screws onto your bike via a hinged stem-cap mount and connects to your phone with four neodymium magnets. The F3 has weathered months in the field, and my phone doesn’t so much as stir, even on rocky, technical terrain.

Mapping
Ranking: 8/10

Apps like Gaia GPS, Trailforks, MTB Project, and OnX proved just as capable as the Garmin. The subscription-based Gaia ($20 per year) was my favorite, because it allowed me to create downloadable courses and navigate using hi-res maps—including downloadable USGS and National Geographic Trails Illustrated maps, even when offline (provided you preload the necessary areas).

Fitness Tracking
Ranking: 6/10

There’s no shortage of fitness tracking apps, but Strava seems to rule supreme, with basic ride mapping and speed, distance, and duration tracking. Just push start when you begin and stop when you end, and your phone uploads all your stats to the app when you’re done. You can even use the route function to follow a course in the field, though you’ll need service throughout to do so. What the iPhone (and other smartphones) can’t do is register more advanced data, like heart rate, power, and cadence, from other ANT+ devices.

User Interface
Ranking: 10/10

The iPhone X is massive on the front of the bike, but that big screen made it easy to navigate new areas while riding. The phone’s touchscreen interface is far superior to the Garmin, especially considering you also have Google Maps, which is convenient when touring new places or just commuting home.

Battery Life
Ranking: 5/10

While the new iPhone’s battery life is impressive (Apple claims up to 12 hours with heavy internet use, and I’ve routinely gotten 18 and more), apps like Gaia and OnX chew through the power. On the bikepacking tour, I routinely emptied the iPhone battery in four to five hours.

Cost
Ranking: 4/10

A fully loaded X like mine goes for $1,150, and if you factor Apple Care, an OtterBox case, and the F3 mount, you’re pushing $1,500. That’s more than double the Garmin, though if you plan to have a phone anyway, then the cost may be a nonissue.

Garmin Edge 1030

This top-end model is Garmin’s finest and largest cyclist-specific computer. It is more than twice as thick as the iPhone X, but it weighs 30 percent less (123 grams) and its screen is roughly half the size. There are smaller, less expensive full-featured Garmin devices (like the new 520 Plus), but I prefer the 1030’s bigger screen for mapping, and it seemed the most apt comparison to the X.

Durability
Ranking: 9/10

The 1030 is so well weather-sealed, including a plug for all ports, that I’ve ridden with it in all-day rain with zero issues. The screen is also tougher: I put a plastic screen cover on past Edge models and still ended up with scratches from swiping with gritty gloves, but I used no such protector on the 1030 and my screen remained pristine.

Mapping
Ranking: 8/10

Garmin pretty much has GPS mapping down pat. The 1030 comes with a strong set of base maps, and it’s easy to upload tracks and courses via the Garmin Connect app, which tracks your ride stats over time. You can also sync the device to third-party apps like Strava and Training Peaks for seamless uploads and downloads, including a new functionality (IQ Connect) that allows you to download routes without plugging the device into your computer. The maps even let you search for amenities (restaurants, lodging, etc.) and create routes to get there. I do wish that we could upload other maps, like USGS, as with Gaia.

Fitness Tracking
Ranking: 10/10

What sets the 1030 (and many cycling computers) apart from the iPhone are the fitness-specific functions. You can upload and create workouts to follow, but the 1030 is also compatible with countless external devices via both ANT+ and Bluetooth Smart, including power, cadence, speed, and heart rate monitors; Shimano Di2 components; lights; and cameras. Garmin also introduced a Training Status feature, which uses heart rate analytics from a company called FirstBeat to monitor your efforts over time and ultimately offer detailed statistics on fitness load, stress, and rest to help with planning your workout regimen.

User Interface
Ranking: 5/10

Garmin’s interface works pretty well but still feels rudimentary compared to the iPhone. The new touchscreen is an improvement over past iterations, though it’s variable with gloves. The screen resolution and backlight, though solid, still doesn’t compete with Apple. And despite the new homepage layout and the ability to create separate accounts for different bikes, I still occasionally spend too much time trying to find functions (such as turning Auto Stop on and off) because they are buried under stacks of menus.

Battery Life
Ranking: 9/10

I’ve run my 1030 for up to 19 hours on a charge. With this model, Garmin has introduced a new supplemental battery pack, the Charge Power Pack ($130), which clips to the bottom of the unit using a two-sided, out-front mount and provides 24 additional hours of run time. That puts you into two full days of run time, which was enough to get me through four days of touring without a recharge. That’s outstanding.

Cost
Ranking: 7/10

Starting at $600, the Garmin Edge 1030 isn’t cheap, and that doesn’t count all the extra costs of peripherals.

Verdict

For avid cyclists who value training and metrics, a dedicated cycling computer such as the Garmin Edge 1030 is a no-brainer. It’s not cheap, but this device can capture and track everything, and the mapping capabilities are top-notch. Garmin has even made its computers useful for bikepacking with the addition of the supplemental battery pack. Of all the dedicated cycling computers I’ve used, the 1030 is the most advanced, despite the slightly clunky interface.

For riders who don’t need all that data and don’t plan to regularly ride more than three or four hours at a time, a smartphone has become a very good choice. The constantly improving apps make it possible to easily track the basics and navigate in the backcountry, even if you don’t have a signal. The F3 mount means you can do it without putting your investment in serious peril. The mount will even change the way I ride: I liked having fingertip access to music, audiobooks, podcasts, my camera, and a backup mapping system so much that I will ride with my phone on my bars on all future bikepacking trips. Since most people these days carry a smartphone, this is a great option for those who don’t want to spend more—like my friend who questioned the need for a Garmin.

Buy Garmin Buy iPhone

Thousands Cheated at the Mexico City Marathon

>

Over 3,000 people were disqualified from the Mexico City Marathon last week for allegedly cutting the course. Unlike other major races, however, competitors weren’t tempted by better times, but Facebook likes and a commemorative medal.

Each year since 2013, marathon finishers have received a medal shaped like one of the letters in “Mexico.” The awards are part of a ploy to garner interest in the race so it can earn gold level status with the International Association of Athletics Federation (IAAF), which would place it on the same status level as prestigious races such as the Boston and New York City Marathons. This year, the finisher’s medal was the coveted final “O,” meaning athletes who completed all six races had the chance to round out their collection. Apparently, the combination of the chance to spell out the host country’s name in hardware and snag finish lines selfies motivated many of the 3,090 people disqualified based on time inconsistencies—accounting for almost 10 percent of finishers.  

“From a marketing standpoint, it’s been a total success,” race director Javier Carvallo told ESPN. “But it has created some problems.”

Last year 5,806—nearly one in five—racers were disqualified for cheating. This year, Carvallo vowed to take steps to eradicate cheating, including selling replicas of all six medals to runners and non-participants alike. Initially, his efforts seemed to have been somewhat effective: the trend was down nearly 47 percent from last year,city sports director Horacio de la Vega said in a news conference. But, according to Derek Murphy of race watchdog site Marathon Investigation the number of disqualifications could actually be closer to 5,000. 

Ironically, many offenders were caught by their fellow social media users. Facebook watchdog group “¿Ya se cansaron?" (Have you tired yet?) posted photos of suspects, including bibbed “runners” standing on the side of the course waiting to hop on at the 20 kilometer mark. They told ESPN that most of their catches came from suspicious friends and followers of the course cutters.

Despite the high number of cheaters, the Mexico City Marathon still has a shot at bumping up its current IAAF Silver Label to Gold. While the IAAF cites parameters such as strict anti-doping methods and international broadcast capabilities as qualifications for earning the distinction, requirements for curbing course cutting are absent. In other big races, cheating is relatively rare—for example, only about 50 of the 50,530 finishers in the 2014 New York City Marathon were reportedly disqualified for cheating, and most of those were accidental.

While it’s impossible to know how many people have a complete MEXICO hanging on their walls, officials noted that 925 people managed to earn their set legitimately.

You’re Faster with Friends, Even Uphill

Conventional wisdom says that drafting doesn’t matter when cycling up steep hills. It’s wrong.

Over the last five years, a succession of supremely talented super-domestiques—Richie Porte, Wout Poels, Geraint Thomas, Mikel Landa, Michal Kwiatkowski—have shepherded Team Sky’s Chris Froome to four Tour de France victories. These riders stick with the leader at all times, sheltering him from the wind and chasing down breakaways from rivals. While domestiques have been around for more than a century, they’ve become increasingly indispensable in the last two decades—particularly during the mountain stages where the Tour is won or lost. “The steep slopes of France’s mountain ranges,” a post-mortem of Froome’s 2017 victory explained, “is where domestiques’ work is most obvious.”
 
But there’s a mystery here. The most obvious benefit of having a friendly cyclist in front of you is aerodynamic: drafting behind another cyclist typically allows you to do about 30 percent less work to maintain the same pace. But that’s heavily dependent on how fast you’re riding. Once you start climbing a mountain, your speed drops and drafting becomes less important. Instead, the hard part of climbing a mountain is fighting gravity, which your domestique can’t help you with. According to one analysis, drafting becomes essentially irrelevant on gradients steeper than 7.2 percent. For context, the average gradient on Mont Ventoux is about 7.5 percent.
 
Why, then, does Froome apparently get such a big boost from having riders like Kwiatkowski “pulling” him up the mountain stages? One theory is that the benefits are primarily psychological—perhaps, for example, allowing the leader to maintain a steady and efficient pace without having to expend as much mental effort on self-monitoring. Focusing on something external, like your teammate’s back, may also take your mind off how much you’re hurting.
 
This is a question that isn’t unique to cycling: a few years ago, a study on members of the Tunisian national track team concluded that the benefits of drafting in a 3,000-meter race were a “placebo,” resulting from psychological rather than aerodynamic benefits. Similarly, after Eliud Kipchoge followed an aerodynamically optimized group of six pacemakers to run a 2:00:25 marathon in Nike’s Breaking2 race last year, I looked back at the role of pacemakers in the four most recent marathon world records—and found that the record-setters were mostly running beside rather than behind their pacemakers. Whatever benefit they believed they were getting from their pacers, it wasn’t aerodynamic.
 
This is the riddle that a research team led by Théo Ouvrard at France’s University of Franche-Comté, working with the FDJ professional cycling squad, decided to tackle in a new study in the International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. To do it, they recruited 12 well-trained competitive cyclists to do a pair of uphill time trials over a distance of 2.7K (1.7 miles) with a fairly steady gradient averaging 7.4 percent. In random order on separate days, they did it once solo and once being paced by an experienced domestique, who was riding an electrically-assisted bike giving him an extra 150 watts to ensure that he could pace steadily. The pacer was instructed to act just as he would in a real race, following the instructions of the rider behind him to speed up or slow down.
 
Sure enough, the riders went faster when they were paced, improving their time by 4.2 percent from 9:05 to 8:42 on average. But why?
 
There are two basic possibilities. One is that riders were able to deliver more power to the pedals thanks to the presence of their teammate, enabling them to ride faster. This would presumably be accompanied by higher heart rate and lactate levels, signaling that the riders were essentially pushing their bodies harder.
 
The other possibility is that they delivered the exact same power to the pedals, but the bike still went faster. In the latter case, that would mean that the forces opposing them—gravity, rolling resistance, and aerodynamic drag—were lessened. The first two of these forces, gravity and rolling resistance, were held constant by exactly matching the total weight of rider plus bike before each ride, and by inflating the tires to exactly the same pressure. So only the aerodynamics could change.
 
Here’s what the average power output looked like in the two rides:

(International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance)

You can see that the power, which was measured by a hub-mounted power meter, stays essentially identical, with a significant difference emerging only in the last 10 percent of the ride. During that last segment, the paced cyclists were able to ramp up their power output by an extra 9.1 percent relative to the unpaced ride. Similarly, the average heart rate and final lactate levels were essentially the same in both rides.
 
When you run these numbers, the explanation for the improved performance isn’t all aerodynamics, but it isn’t all mental either. Since the power outputs in the two rides are so similar, the biggest factor is that the cyclists are getting more speed from a given level of power thanks to reduced drag. That explains 58 percent of the performance gains, according to the researchers. Such a big aerodynamic contribution while climbing is a bit of a surprise, but it’s perhaps a reminder that real-world “ecologically valid” tests are more useful than theoretical models in determining what really matters.
 
The rest of the performance gain is mostly due to the increased power in the final stages of the climb. In order to understand what psychological factors may have been at work, the cyclists were quizzed as soon as they finished about their ratings of effort and pleasure, where they were focusing their attention, and what they were thinking about during the ride. While this approach is incapable of reading the cyclists’ minds during the race, it should give some insights about their thought processes. The idea is that focusing on external pace cues, like a teammate in front of you, might reduce the amount of inwardly focused time you spend dwelling on your own discomfort, in addition to motivating you and relieving you of some of the cognitive burden of pacing.
 
However, contrary to the researchers’ expectations, there were no apparent differences in levels of intrinsic versus external motivation, or in the relative amount of attention paid to internal monitoring, outward monitoring, voluntary or involuntary distractions, and so on. The only notable psychological difference was that the cyclists enjoyed the paced ride more: they rated their pleasure as 4.6 out of 10 compared to 3.3 in the unpaced ride.
 
There are some ways you can sort of explain this in a hand-waving way. The researchers point to the work of University of Kent scientist Samuele Marcora, noting that feelings of pleasure may have a subtle influence on how your brain interprets the effort of exercise. The fact that you’re having a bit more fun when tucked behind your teammate allows you to tolerate higher levels of discomfort, enabling you to ramp up the power in the final stages of the ride.
 
When I reflect on my own experiences in paced versus unpaced running races, the overwhelming impression I had was that tucking in behind a rabbit allowed me to essentially turn my mind “off” and run in autopilot for most of the race. Then, when the rabbit stepped off the track, I would have more mental energy left for the push to the finish. This study didn’t find that—but then again, it didn’t have the ability to distinguish between what the athletes were thinking about, say, halfway through the race versus in the final portion of the race. It assumed that thought patterns stayed roughly similar throughout, which may have missed some subtle changes.
 
So in the end, I think this study cleared up half a mystery: yes, drafting is a big deal even when you’re climbing a mountain, at least for top riders under these particular conditions. The other half of the mystery, meanwhile, is as obscure as ever. What is the strange alchemy that enables friends and teammates to bring out the best in us? There have been lots of theories, involving things like brain chemicals and the evolution of social bonding. But the bottom line, as the researchers point out, is that “it may no longer be possible for any professional cyclist to win a Grand Tour without using this strategy”—because it really works.


My new book, Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance, with a foreword by Malcolm Gladwell, is now available. For more, join me on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the Sweat Science email newsletter.

Do Olympic Medalists Live Longer Than Chess Masters?

You’d think the fittest men and women on the planet would outlive the most sedentary ones. But you’d be wrong.

When Hikaru Nakamura, a U.S. chess champion who has been ranked as high as second in the world, won his age group at a small 5K race in Florida last year, it triggered a minor ripple of interest among the small circle of people whose interests overlap both pursuits. Chess, after all, is about as sedentary as it gets, with seemingly toxic levels of stress during high-end competitions. You expect players to keel over in the middle of games from a heart attack (as one did at the 2014 Chess Olympiad in Norway), not to win running races.

But a new study comparing the longevity of chess grandmasters and Olympic medal–winning athletes suggests otherwise—and its surprising results hint that our understanding of the health benefits and risks associated with exceptional performance, either physical or mental, still has some gaps.

Researchers at the universities of Melbourne and Queensland in Australia combed the records of the World Chess Federation to identify every grandmaster since 1950, when the term gained official status. They focused on 28 countries in Europe and North America included in the Human Mortality Database, which provides a baseline for how long people in the general population are expected to live. They also identified every Olympic medalist from those countries between 1950 and 2016. That gave the researchers a dataset of 1,208 grandmasters and 15,157 Olympic medalists, for whom they collected dates of death to determine whether they lived shorter or longer lives than the general population.

It’s pretty well established that elite athletes—even NFL players, at least according to some analyses—tend to live longer than the rest of the population. For example, a study published earlier this month tracked every French Olympic athlete between 1912 and 2012 and found that they lived, on average, 6.5 years longer than the general population, mainly due to a reduction in deaths from cancer. The simple narrative is that all that exercise makes them healthier. But when the French Olympians were divided into different event groups, even those in “precision” sports like archery and shooting seemed to have roughly the same longevity boost as marathoners and soccer players and so on.

Interestingly, there is evidence that success in other realms is also associated with longevity. For example, a famous study in 2001 found that Oscar winners lived about four years longer than Oscar nominees (though the statistical methods in that study have since been challenged). Perhaps the socioeconomic boost associated with success pays a dividend; there may also be psychological factors.

The picture is a little murkier for chess players. In fact, the only previous look at this question came from an obscure 1969 paper in the Journal of Genetic Psychology. As I explained a few years ago, this study used a very limited sample of 18th- and 19th-century chess masters to determine that world chess champions died earlier than outstanding chess masters, who in turn died earlier than lesser masters, who died earlier than the hacks who composed chess problems rather than winning tournaments. Increasing levels of excellence seemed to incur a progressively harsher toll on the chess players.

Results of the new study, with a far larger and less capricious dataset, were published in PLOS One earlier this month and found exactly the opposite. A chess grandmaster at age 30 is expected to live to 83.6, which is 7.7 years longer than the general population. Interestingly, the survival advantage of the chess players was essentially identical to the survival advantage of the Olympic medalists. Being great seems to be very good for you, independent of your physical habits.

There are all sorts of possible explanations and interpretations here. It may be that the people who make it to the top in both chess and sports tend to start life with a good set of genes, come from relatively privileged socioeconomic backgrounds, or have certain habits that make them both healthy and successful.

To my surprise, the explanation favored by the paper’s authors seems to be that aspiring chess champions “may be encouraged to make necessary health improvements (e.g. reduced smoking and alcohol consumption, improved nutrition, more regular cardiovascular exercise, etc.) to improve one’s cognitive performance.” It’s certainly true that many top chess players take their physical preparation very seriously. Still, I’m a little skeptical that the longevity benefits of chess come from physical fitness. After all, pretty much anyone in any cognitively demanding career stands to benefit from making those same generic health improvements. Nakamura’s time in that Florida 5K was 28:11, which is creditable, but for a male in his twenties, it’s not the sort of unusual performance you’d expect would signal an extra seven years of life.

It’s probably not worth spending too much time speculating on why chess players live longer, since this type of retrospective study can’t provide any solid answers. But the study does imply that the longevity benefit observed in elite athletes may have little to do with the herculean training efforts of their youth. Instead, other factors may be more important.

On that note, it’s worth pointing out one last longevity study, also published in the past few weeks. This one, in Circulation, focused on regular folks instead of world-beaters and looked for patterns in 42,000 deaths over a 34-year follow-up period in two major epidemiological studies. The researchers assigned subjects a risk score of either zero or one for five boringly familiar lifestyle risk factors: never smoking, keeping BMI between 18.5 and 24.9, getting at least 30 minutes of moderate or vigorous exercise per day, moderate alcohol intake, and a healthy diet. Those who ticked all five boxes had a life expectancy at age 50 that was 14 years longer for women and 12.2 years longer for men compared to those who ticked none of the boxes.

In other words, you don’t have to be a hero or a legend to live longer. You just have to take care of some very basic things. And the fact that heroes and legends tend to live longer may simply reflect the fact that their success is linked in some way to their ability to take care of these basics. Of course, I’m not suggesting you shouldn’t try to become a legend. That pursuit brings its own rewards, however far up the mountain you manage to climb—but immortality isn’t one of them.


My new book, Endure: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance, with a foreword by Malcolm Gladwell, is now available. For more, join me on Twitter and Facebook, and sign up for the Sweat Science email newsletter.

Orcas in the Mist

>

The little orca surfaces under an Apocalyptic red sun that’s barely visible behind a shroud of smoke from the wildfires burning across the West.

We’re headed east down the Strait of Juan de Fuca toward Washington’s San Juan Island, pacing a three-year-old killer whale named Scarlet, also known as J50, as she travels with her mother, brother, and older sister in endless pursuit of salmon.

All four whales are part of J Pod, now known around the world for the recent display of grief by pod member J35, or Tahlequah, who carried her dead newborn for 17 days and 1,000 miles. It was a protest march against all that we’ve done to kill off these magnificent animals by starving them of their food source, poisoning their water and prey, and filling their habitat with the incessant disturbance of vessel traffic.

I’m out here as a volunteer along with a team of whale specialists and a wildlife veterinarian under federal permit to assess and document Scarlet’s health. As she rises for a gulp of the same smoky air we’re breathing, her short, sharp blow is met with groans aboard our small boat. None of us have ever seen such a skinny whale.

For those of us who live among the orcas, Scarlet meant hope. She was a Christmas present, born at the end of December 2014 in the main fjord of the small island I live on, called, coincidentally, Orcas. The island was named after some Spanish viceroy, not the cetaceans, but you wouldn’t know it by the ubiquity of postcards, T-shirts, plushies, and whale watchers.

There’s an informal West Coast cult of the killer whale that’s devoted to J, K, and L Pods, which together make up the Southern Resident killer whales who spend a good part of their year foraging and socializing in the Washington State and British Columbian inland waters that make up the Salish Sea. In 50 years, this clan of supersize dolphins has gone from being vilified and shot by fishermen to being rounded up for marine parks—48 Southern Residents were caught or killed during the capture operations in the sixties and seventies—to becoming the most iconic creature of the Pacific Northwest wilds.

Those wilds are myth now. Ecosystem disruption reaches every part of the region. Climate change is exacerbating wildfires, killing seabirds, and melting the Cascades snowpack earlier—making the streams less suitable for salmon. Our centuries of assault on the rivers, forests, estuaries, and coastlines have done a number on this remarkable place.

And the numbers are looking very bad for killer whales, the apex predator in a dysfunctional environment. After the captures stopped, the Southern Resident population climbed from 70 to a high of 98 in 1995. Then they dropped again, to below 80, and were declared federally endangered by Canada in 2001 and by the United States in 2005. In 2015, they were named one of NOAA’s Species in the Spotlight, the animals most at risk of extinction and deserving of extra effort and attention.

The Southern Residents numbered just 78, with no live births in more than two years, when Scarlet came along. Born to a beautiful female named Slick, Scarlet was the first of what became known as the baby boom, with eight calves added to J and L Pods over the following 13 months. A compact black-and-white package of pure exuberance, Scarlet represented everything we love about these playful, caring, intelligent, highly social animals, who stick together tighter than most human families.

I’ve been spending time out here on the water for 15 years, and my favorite hour came one August afternoon in 2015 while drifting off Stuart Island as J Pod hunted the tide rips. Scarlet, now eight months old, was determined to spend more time out of the water than in it. She did breach after full-body breach, stood on her head and waved her tail in the air, slapped her wobbly pectoral fins on the surface, and bumped back and forth between her sister and an aunt, who created a playpen for her with their bodies.      

Three years later, half the baby boomers are dead. There are only 75 Southern Residents left, the lowest number in 35 years. And Scarlet is in very bad shape. Peanut head, they call it, when a whale loses so much blubber that you can see the shape of her skull. Healthy orcas do not have necks.

Nearly all the wild orcas seen in the condition Scarlet’s in have died, and Scarlet is a precious female, potentially producing up to six calves over her lifetime. So NOAA and a U.S. and Canadian collection of federal, state, local, and Native American tribal agencies, along with various public and private institutions and nonprofits, are making an unprecedented attempt to save her. Scarlet’s gotten lab tests and a shot of antibiotics, and there’s even been an attempt to feed her live Chinook salmon. Scientists weren’t able to determine whether Scarlet took the salmon, but she’s scheduled for more antibiotics and an anti-parasite shot if she makes it back within range of the wildlife vets in time.

Whether she lives or dies, Scarlet’s poor health and Tahlequa’s grief are just two agonizing illustrations of a larger picture: that the current state of the Southern Resident killer whales is a disgrace and a huge embarrassment for the U.S. and Canada, both of which claim these orcas as totems of all that’s wild and exceptional about them.

We’ve declared the orcas national and regional treasures, bestowed upon them our strongest protections, yet we continue to kill them with building permits, logging, ranching and farming leases, fishing quotas, and dam permits, which all affect the Chinook salmon that these orcas need to survive.

The Canadian government is showing signs of environmental schizophrenia, cutting some Chinook quotas to leave more for the whales while at the same time doing everything it can to build the Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion that will cause a sevenfold increase of oil-tanker traffic through the orcas’ critical habitat.

Beyond the noise of all those ships, a single big spill could be game over for the orcas, who already carry a massive load of persistent organic pollutants in their tissues, which mothers inadvertently pass on to their babies in their milk, giving each newborn significant doses of toxic PCBs and chemical flame retardants during their most critical development period.

On the U.S. side, decades of greed and cowardice have left politicians no place to piss without hitting a third rail like dam removal, turning agricultural land back into salmon habitat, and curtailing treaty-mandated tribal fishing rights.

Stakeholders like commercial and recreational fishermen, farmers who use the water behind the Snake River dams for irrigation and transportation, whale-watch operators, coastal and watershed developers, and property owners have all dug in, firing blame at one another or at easy targets like sea lions, which have learned to feed on the salmon stuck behind dams. Government programs to cull sea lions are another arrogantly engineered human solution to a problem we created, just like the fish hatcheries we built after destroying native runs.

These circular firing squads leave the orcas in the middle, poisoned and starving.

No help can be expected from Washington, D.C., with the current administration and its congressional allies intent on ripping apart the EPA that protects the nation's clean air and water and pays for Salish Sea restoration projects, and hobbling the Endangered Species Act, which is supposed to protect and restore the orcas and the Chinook salmon. The fix here is simple: vote in November.

At the Washington State level, there’s an opportunity that has every feeling of a last chance. Governor Jay Inslee has convened an emergency orca task force and promised to take bold action. There are some good folks on the committee, and their draft action plan is due on his desk October 1.

If the task force comes through, there could be legitimate short and long-term actions to save the Southern Residents, the Chinook salmon, and the habitat that they—and we—depend on. If, however, they punt on the tough stuff, as others have in the past, then the orcas are screwed.

When we left Scarlet after following her that day on the water, she was chugging along at four knots. She hit a wall of current as the tide changed, and her family forged ahead in search of food, which orcas commonly share with their podmates. Scarlet fell a thousand yards behind the others but gamely continued pushing east. We lost sight of her small dorsal fin as the chop came up, her faint blows lost in the smoke from hundreds of fires.  

Lead photo: Scarlet, or J50, swimming with her family in early August (Katy Foster/NOAA Fisheries, permit #18786)

Bob Friel (@bobfriel), an author and documentary filmmaker working on a video series called Salish Sea Wild, lives in the San Juan Islands. He is a volunteer with the Marine Mammal Stranding Network and Large Whale Disentanglement Network.

Going Fishing in New York City

>

A few weeks ago, Kimberly C. Lee tied on a rubber worm and sent a long cast sailing into the lake in her backyard. A pink sunset glittered on the water, and a heron swept by overhead. Lee reeled in the worm. For a moment, all was quiet.

An elderly man driving an electric golf cart puttered up the path behind her and braked. “Caught anything?” he asked.

“Yeah—a largemouth bass,” Lee said.

Really?” he said, eyes wide in amazement.

Before she could continue, the man drove away in his cart. “Why so surprised?” Lee muttered to herself. “You’re the one who works here.”

Still, Lee, president of the Manhattan chapter of the Brooklyn Fishing Club, could excuse the intrusion. Her backyard is technically a shared one—New York City’s Central Park—and the cart driver was an oblivious Park employee. She’s used to the wonder in onlookers’ eyes. There’s something shocking about pulling a fish from a body of water when it’s flanked by concrete canyons and hordes of tourists.

Lee wasn’t the only angler at the 11-acre lake at the park’s northern end, known as Harlem Meer. A few yards away, a middle-aged man in sandals cast a fly rod and hauled out bluegill after bluegill. Down the shoreline, a group of four young men in Supreme hats and fresh sneakers flipped jigs into a narrow channel and debated moving on to their next spot. As the air cooled and the park cleared, a ratio shifted: For every person reading or taking a twilight walk around the Meer, there was another one holding a fishing rod, hoping to catch an urban bass.

Urban angling has been around in America as long as there have been cities, but unlike the broader categories of fly-fishing, bass fishing, and saltwater angling, it has no recognition as a unique pursuit, no guidebook or seminal novel. Rather, it’s treated as the redheaded stepchild of fishing, an activity seemingly taken up only by those poor souls crammed into cities, chosen out of necessity. Recently, I bought the book Bright Rivers by the excellent fly-fisherman and writer Nick Lyons because I heard that it focused on fishing in New York. I was disappointed to read that the stories were all about escaping New York to fish elsewhere. Lyons’s bright rivers were all “wild, untamed—like that Montana eagle riding a thermal on extended wings.” Of New York City itself, Lyons wanted one thing: out. “I do not want the qualities of my soul unlocked only by this tense, cold, gray, noisy, grabby place—full of energy and neurosis and art and antiart and getting and spending,” he wrote.

Even the Gray Lady took a shot at anglers with an incredulous headline from 2005: “Fishing in Central Park. For Fish. Really.” In fact, the Big Apple has quietly become a prime model for the richness of urban fishing culture—really.

The bustle of New York City life seems to make people forget that four of its five boroughs are islands, which means there are plenty of shorelines. Shorelines packed with people, yes, but none of that negates the city’s fishiness: its jetty breaks, the way its tides sweep in hordes of baitfish, the shaded banks of its freshwater ponds and lakes.

“To be a really good angler, you have to learn fishing in all different types of situations and for all different types of species,” Steve Wong, a supervising educator with the Prospect Park Alliance, recently told me as he fished a secret spot on Prospect Park Lake in Brooklyn. Wong isn’t part of any particular fishing group, like the Brooklyn Fishing Club, but he’s deeply enmeshed in the fishing culture of the city. He grew up fishing the piers and beaches of Los Angeles. Then he moved to Seoul, South Korea, where he joined a cadre of older Korean men who fish offshore islands from tiny portaboats. Wong next moved to New York, seven years ago. He found, unexpectedly, that it had some of the best fishing yet.

“In NYC, you have access to all those different types of fishing. You have great trout fishing a train ride away” in the streams and rivers of the Catskills, including Roscoe, New York, nicknamed Trout Town, USA. “Great ice fishing. For saltwater, you have the striper fishery of the Hudson Bay, and even more species—fluke, bluefish—out on Long Island. And the city can be a bass fishing destination.” Wong accented this last point by hauling in two decent-sized largemouth bass in three casts.

The data back up that big fish story. “We have some really good waters in terms of fish catch rate,” said Melissa Cohen, manager of New York’s five boroughs with the Department of Environmental Conservation Regional Fisheries. Specifically, 2017 creel surveys, conducted by talking to hundreds of New York City anglers, showed that catch rates for largemouth bass larger than 12 inches in Harlem Meer in Central Park were higher than 88 percent of all other surveyed lakes in the state. In Prospect Park Lake, the catch rates for largemouth bass larger than 15 inches were higher than 96 percent of all other surveyed lakes in the state. That makes them two of the most open-secret honey holes in the United States.

It might seem inevitable that a mainstream fishing club would spring up in a town of 9 million where the fishing is so good. But for a long time, those clubs were mostly exclusive, like the well-heeled, male-dominated New York Anglers Club, or extremely specific, like the Staten Island Tuna Club. Then, in 2013, Victor Lucia, a 25-year-old from New Jersey living in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, began researching urban fishing myths and legends in New York City during a grad school class and was surprised to find there had never been a prominentfishing club in the borough. So he started his own. He also had selfish motivations: Lucia wanted somebody to fish with, and urban fishing in New York at the time was a lonely pursuit.

“I thought, how many of these 9 million people who live here are interested in fishing? Probably a lot,” Lucia told me. “But how many know about the fishing options? Not a lot.”

Five years later, the Brooklyn Fishing Club has more than 300 members, chapters in all five boroughs, and an engaged and active membership. Lucia built this membership using social media; the club’s Instagram account has more than 23,000 followers. The club’s merchandise sales are up too. Their most recent sweatshirt features a logo of the Notorious B.I.G., cane in one hand, striped bass in the other. 

The club has monthly meetings in each of its borough chapters and provides a variety of fishing opportunities, facilitating charter boats to saltwater fish at reasonable costs and providing members-only trips to fishing destinations in the New York state area. It also provides members with discounts at local fishing businesses. Mostly, the club serves as a mixer for anglers, who by banding together have become much more than the sum of their parts.

“There are a lot of people who take the skills they already have from fishing wherever they came from and apply that to this new environment,” Lucia said.

At a recent meeting, a diverse group wearing Brooklyn Fishing Club gear traded stories and knocked back a few beers. A Guyanese-American named Chris mingled with a white lawyer named Eric and talked about the quest to catch his first striped bass, until they were interrupted by James, who is African-American—and whom Chris happened to work with. Neither knew the other man was in the club, or that he was an angler. Small world, this Big Apple fishing scene.

“Someone will cut my throat for this,” James said. “But at that spot in Coney Island where you’re fishing, there’s a great little fluke hole…”

The anglers in the Brooklyn Fishing Club, and throughout many parts of New York City, belie stereotypes. Nearly 40 percent of anglers in the United States are above the age of 40; the club is dominated by a younger crowd in their twenties and thirties. Seventy-eight percent of anglers on average throughout the United States are white; the club is made up of close to 50 percent people of color, and a creel study in Harlem Meer found that 50 percent of regular anglers there were African-American, 23 percent were Caucasian, and 20 percent were Latino. If there’s a place where fishing correlates to the growing diversity of America, this is it. (Still underrepresented: women.)

Lucia uses Instagram and Facebook to build his community by constantly posting images taken by club members holding fish. Those photos are candy to other people who fish, join the club, take photos of their own, and share them with Lucia to repost on the club’s Instagram account in a voyeuristic cycle of catches, releases, and likes. Since the late aughts, social media—in particular, YouTube channels like Googan Squad and 1Rod1Reel—have been instrumental in hooking Generation Z on angling and imbuing the sport with the “skater look—branded gear and skinny jeans,” said Steve Wong, the Prospect Park Alliance educator. In a city where you can hop from subway to walking path to lakeside, most New York anglers forego traditional fishing gear for their standard stylish fare, skinny jeans included. “Fishing used to be all about salty old dudes,” Wong said. “It’s changed. It wasn’t cool before. It is now.”

But not everyone loves the New York fishing trend. When I asked an employeein a prominent Manhattan fly shop about the Brooklyn Fishing Club, he made a face and mentioned its members’ tendency to post good fishing holes on Facebook, a phenomenon called “burning” that can cause anglers to swarm a spot. (Lucia and veteran club members warn new members not to burn spots and monitor the club’s social media pages to keep it from happening.) Some relationships in the fishing community are tenuous; Lucia recounted sparring with fishing store owners who had promised deals for members but reneged. “They said, ‘We’ve been around much longer than the club,’” Lucia said. “And I said, ‘Well I can promise you, the club will be around much longer than you if you don’t respect me.’” And there are plenty of young anglers who, like Wong, would rather go it alone than team up.

But New York City’s fishing boom is not alone. “Almost every city I’ve been to has an urban or streetfishing movement going on,” said professional angler Mike Iaconelli, whose National Geographic television show, Fish My City, explores fishing in New York City, Miami, New Orleans, and Austin. Viewers discover what Lucia, Wong, and others in New York City already know: Urban fishing’s new grassroots movement is powerful and seems genuinely concerned with the future.

As an offshoot of his efforts with the Brooklyn Fishing Club, Lucia runs a program called the Maritime Youth Alliance to take underserved city kids fishing every summer. “People are always taking kids out of the city to teach them how to fish,” he said. “Take them fishing here! Show them how to fish the shipping lanes underneath the Verrazano Bridge.”

As the sun set back at Harlem Meer, Lee ended up sharing her rods with two young Hispanic kids and showed them how to cast. 

“Thanks for letting us fish. It was fun,” the kids said, and then ran off toward their next adventure.

“It’s cheesy, but they’re going to remember that,” Lee said. Then she sent a cast into the Manhattan twilight.

What Climber Tommy Caldwell Is Reading Right Now

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

You probably know Tommy Caldwell for his pioneering ascent of El Capitan’s Dawn Wall, the blankest section on Yosemite’s marquee granite monolith and, at 5.14d, possibly the world’s hardest big wall. His years-long assault on the route with climbing partner Kevin Jorgensen is the centerpiece of the Sender Films feature documentary “The Dawn Wall,” whose one-night theatrical release last month was so successful, a nationwide encore screening has been added for October 8. 

“It’s been a trip,” says Caldwell, adding that the ensuing media tour has left him with a lot of time on airplanes and trains. “It’s given me a lot of time to read, which I don’t often get at home with the kids.” Here are the books he’s carrying with him while he promotes the film.

“I spend so much time outside, and I know it brings me peace and energizes my mind and body, but this has the actual data and science on benefits to spending time in nature. It discusses nature-deficit disorder in kids, which reinforces the way my wife, Becca, and I raise our kids, Fitz and Ingrid: most days, we’re outside at least some of the day. We’re also renting out our house soon and going on the road for a year, so we can travel and get Fitz and Ingrid outside as much as possible before they start school. Fitz would be starting kindergarten this year, but we’re going to homeschool him for this year. Except I call it World School.”

Buy Now


“I’ve been a Patagonia ambassador for nine years now, and I love it. They have a greater goal than the bottom line and they’re not just in the business to make money. Athletes are becoming more involved in advocacy, and Patagonia, along with Protect Our Winters and the American Alpine Club’s Climb the Hill event, has given us avenues to do that.”

Buy Now


“This one was a recommendation from Alex Honnold. It’s about what the world would look like without people, which is good baseline knowledge for when you’re trying to be an environmentalist and think about positive ways we can impact the environment or reverse the damage we’ve done in the past.”

Buy Now


“I don’t read a lot of fiction, but Gabriel—a climber himself—describes scenes more vividly than any author I’ve ever read. The subject matter [the isolation and abuse of a child] is intense and can be hard to read, but it’s an extraordinary book, one of those you can’t stop thinking about when you put it down.”

Buy Now


“I read all the Krakauer books. This one is about rape in America in general, but especially cases at the University of Montana between 2008 and 2012. He profiles the people involved, telling their stories and talking about how their lives were affected. It’s really poignant given some recent current events. I’m very much a privileged white male, a one-percenter, and I think there’s a responsibility to try and better understand these issues in this day and age.”

Buy Now


“I’m reading all the kids’ books with Fitz and Ingrid too—Harry Potter, all the Roald Dahl books, that sort of thing. We do a lot of reading to each other when we’re driving. Quite honestly, that’s the majority of the reading I do. That’s probably why the rest of the list is so heavy—I need to create balance.

Buy This Belt and Support Yosemite’s Badass SAR Team

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

Yosemite Search and Rescue is one of the most badass SAR units in the world. Its 60 highly trained volunteers perform technical rescues on 9,000-foot granite walls, many of which require a helicopter, as well as swiftwater rescues, and they even have a canine search team. 

Huckberry and Arcade, two Northern California–based brands, recently teamed up to create a line of adventure belts, based on three of Arcade’s most popular models—the Adventure, Guide, and Hudson. Each belt is made in River Bed Green, a grayish-green hue reminiscent of Yosemite Valley, and 10 percent of the sales will go to help fund YOSAR.

Buy Now

5 Cozy and Performance-Oriented Men’s Flannels

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

There are plenty of reasons to celebrate the coming of fall (ski-mountain season passes are on sale, barrel-aged beers are flooding the shelves, bonfires) but really, we’re most psyched to break out our flannels. Here are five of our favorite flannels, from a traditional take to a shirt designed for drinking beer and every step in between.

Patagonia uses a 6.5-ounce organic cotton with heavy-duty warmth and a “lamb’s butt” softness for its Fjord, which has become a cold-weather staple. Two big chest pockets offer storage, and you can take your pick of fall colors and patterns. If the Fjord is too heavy for you, you can opt for the Lightweight Fjord, which is made from a thinner, 4.5-ounce cotton.

Buy Now


It’s a thick shirt, with a flannel from Portugal that’s lined with a soft cotton-and-rayon thermal layer, so it’s incredibly warm. The big red check gives it a classic look, but it’s full of modern details, like a sunglass loop on the chest, a water-resistant dry pocket for your phone, and a dedicated beer pocket that can hold a bottle or can. Yep, a beer pocket.

Buy Now


Flannel doesn’t always mean plaid. Black Diamond’s Modernist is built from 100 percent organic cotton with a slim, athletic cut. In addition to the front chest pocket, it has an internal chest pocket where you can stash a passport or whatever you’re trying to hide.

Buy Now


This is a new shirt from OR that hits the “performance flannel” niche with a blend of polyester, cotton, and wool. It’s incredibly soft (thanks, wool!) and all that polyester does a good job of managing moisture. The horizontal stripes and double chest pockets give it a western sensibility that we dig.

Buy Now


The Yosemite is built for durability from a brushed flannel of nine-ounce, 100 percent organic cotton. It has a more tailored fit than some of the other flannels on this list, with a shorter tail that’s meant to be worn untucked. Another nice touch—the pencil slot on the front pocket.

Buy Now