Our Favorite Hydro Flasks Are 50 Percent Off

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

We love Hydro Flask bottles because they look great and keep our beverages cold for hours. Select Hydro Flask products are 50 percent off at REI from May 21 to May 28.

Never compromise for cold java and get this coffee flask. The flip lid makes sure you don't spill your precious coffee on the way to the office. 

Buy Now


Take wine with you on your adventures without hassling with glass bottles. This vacuum bottle fits a whole vessel of wine so you'll have enough for your group. 

Buy Now


Specially designed to hold your favorite beer, this growler has double-wall vacuum insulation and insulated cap keep beer at a perfect tap temperature for 24 hours. The plastic cap seals tight to hold carbonation and a unique one-handed design ensures a perfect pour.

Buy Now


Perfect for coffee—hot or iced—this tumbler is sure to make your office mates jealous. The narrow bottom fits in most cup holders.

Buy Now

How to Survive Encounters with Dangerous Animals

>

The title of Rachel Levin’s new book, Look Big, is just about the best two words of advice one can give about how to survive most animal encounters. In her illustrated service manual, Levin breaks down how to handle 50 different kinds of animals common in North America, based on expert advice. Let’s look at her tips for dealing with five of these creatures and see how they stack up with what the experts say—and with real-world experience.

“Leave a snake alone. The bad stuff happens when people don’t. Let the animal pass. Give it a good fifteen feet. Coiled, rattling, and head raised? Give it even more room. If you accidentally step on one and get bitten: keep cool. But seriously, don’t run; getting your heart rate up makes the venom seep into your bloodstream faster. Skip the snakebite kits and tourniquets; that’s outdated advice. Just call Poison Control at 800-222-1222 ASAP. In Arizona or California—where most bites occur—plug this number into your phone.

“And do your best to avoid snakes in the first place. A sunny, 90-degree day is snake weather. Skip the flip-flops, and wear boots instead. Pair them with long, sturdy pants like jeans. (A studyactually proved denim’s effectiveness against venom injection.) Don’t use earbuds (you want to hear the rattle). On a mountain bike, be extra cautious. Rattlesnakes are designed to hear the pounding of bison hooves, not the quiet roll of a tire tread. Peek under a log before sitting on it. Shake out your sleeping bag. And if you’ve got to peel off the trail to pee, toss a few pebbles first.”

According to one study, most snake bites occur on people’s hands and forearms. What does that tell you? Levin is correct that people get bit when they try to mess around with a poisonous snake. I regularly encounter rattlers, both around my home in Los Angeles and on camping trips throughout the desert Southwest. But neither I nor anyone I know has ever been bitten. Actually, I take that back—I watched a friend of a friend get bitten on Instagram a couple years back after he picked up a snake he found on a trail to pose with it for a photo. Rattlers are typically polite enough to warn you of their presence, making them relatively easy to avoid.

“If, one day, you do meet a mountain lion on the trail or, uh, in the city (one was spotted roaming San Francisco not long ago), try your best to look big and very much alive. Stand tall. Stare the lion in the eye. Open your coat. Grab your kids, without bending over. Don’t run (mountain lions are faster). But don’t just stand there, looking scared out of your mind, either—that suggests you are easy prey. (Which, let’s be honest, you are.) Instead, intimidate. Wave your arms. Yell. Scream. Throw water bottles, rocks, whatever you’ve got. If attacked, ‘Give ’em hell,’ says Veronica Yovovich of the Mountain Lion Foundation.What­ever you do, don’t lie down or play dead—­or they’ll eat you for dinner.”

Lion populations are expanding across the country. It’s pretty freaking cool to write that line. Heck, we’ve got one right here in Hollywood. P-22 occasionally shows up on a motion sensor camera and once got trapped in a basement, but otherwise the thousands of people who cross his path every day are unaware of his presence. That’s P-22 in the illustration above, but as far as I know, no day hikers have ever actually run into him on the trails around the Hollywood sign. Want to know how to avoid getting killed and eaten by a mountain lion? Don’t turn into a deer. Otherwise, us humans should count ourselves lucky if we ever get to see one in the wild.

“Put pest control on speed dial and then ransack like a detective searching for evidence, emptying dressers, nightstands, and closets. Bedbugs hide behind headboards and mirrors, on carpets and couches. Scour every crevice and then declutter like you’re Kondo on cold brew, and just keep vacuuming. Swap your wooden bed for steel. They can’t climb metal or bathtubs. (Go ahead: get in and curl up.) Wash and dry everything on high heat, seal the rest of your stuff in Ziploc Big Bags (for up to a year, according to the EPA), and toss whatever you can. This is no time for nostalgia. Trained dogs can find the bedbugs if you can’t (‘Sherlock Hounds,’ as one company calls them). The PackTite Closet Bed Bug Heater System sounds like it helps, but $800 for a product that promises to roast bedbugs right off your shoes? Maybe just buy a new pair.”

Back when I used to live in Brooklyn, our loft in Williamsburg was overrun by bedbugs one summer. I had the telltale red bites from head to toe. We were going broke just trying to pay the rent, and our landlord wouldn’t help, so my roomates and I resolved to tackle the problem ourselves. First, we stripped all our bedding and took that and all our clothes to the laundromat and ran everything through several hot-water cycles. While that was happening, we dusted every surface with diatomaceous earth and packed it into all the nooks and crannies in our furniture. We even cut the fabric off the underside of our couch and filled its springs and frame with the powder. Then we set off way more flea bombs than the square footage called for and hung out at a local dive bar until it was safe to go back home. It might have been luck, but that did the trick. You can beat them.

“Run—zigzag, straight line, doesn’t matter. Alligators might be the only predators in the world you’d have a shot at beating in a race. Though they rarely pursue on land, around water, stay alert. Alligators ambush. They latch on to prey, roll it underwater until drowned and dead, then toss it back like a tequila shot. Which means that adult humans aren’t easy eating. Put up a decent fight, and the alligator might decide to ditch you. ‘They prefer not to contend with violently struggling prey,’ says Allan Woodward, of Florida’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute. ‘Scream. Splash. Kick. Sure, try and punch the snout or gouge out the eyes,’ says Woodward. ‘No guarantees, but it has worked before.’”

The thing about alligators that’ll get you is how high they can jump out of the water and how well-hidden they can lie just below its surface. Crabbing with my kid sister years ago, a very large gator nearly snatched her off a dock as she lay with her head over the side. So my advice is to avoid dangling chicken necks into gator-infested water. And never swim in Florida, obviously.

“‘Well, there’s not much you can do, except get away,’ says Jan Dohner, author of Livestock Guardians.To avoid getting into a dangerous donkey situation in the first place, geld your donkey. ‘Intact males are less predictable than stallions,’ says Dohner. Read its signals: ears back, tail swishing, head swinging—not good. ‘Never turn your back on a jack’ is a good motto. Don’t corner it, either, or enter the enclosure of a donkey you don’t know. And definitely steer clear of its rear.”

One of my favorite 4×4 destinations in Death Valley is lousy with feral donkeys, and you’ll encounter them many other places out west or south of the border. Like bears, they like to sneak into camp and steal your food, so good food discipline and a bear-proof cooler are the easiest ways to keep them away. Given the donkey’s curious nature, they can also engender poor decision-making in humans. Like the book says, just stay clear. A kick will, at a minimum, ruin your day, and despite their domestic appearance, donkeys don’t want you to pet them or attempt to ride them. Put your dog on a leash if there are donkeys around.

Buy Now

Excerpts reprinted from LOOK BIG Copyright © 2018 by Rachel Levin. Illustrations copyright © 2018 by Jeff Östberg. Published by Ten Speed Press, an imprint of Penguin Random House LLC.

Testing Beal's Controversial Escaper Rappel Device

>

Most climbers agree on one thing: rappelling is terrifying. While the concept of using a rappel device to descend a rope is simple, in practice it requires the utmost attention to detail. This proves difficult when you’re mentally and physically exhausted after a long climb and all you can think about is cheeseburgers. The margin for error is razor thin, and accidents often result in death.

Those risks are compounded by the fact that most big climbs require multiple rappels to get to the ground, which adds logistical challenges. If you want to rappel more than 30 to 35 meters (roughly 100 to 115 feet) at a time (or half the length of one rope), you need to bring along another rope. But a second rope adds weight, and when you’re committing to big days in high mountains, extra pounds matter. 

The Escaper ($50), a new detachable anchor system from French climbing-gear manufacturer Beal, could solve that problem, allowing you to rappel the full length of a single rope, then retrieve the rope by pulling on it a certain way and keep descending. Weighing in at 3.2 ounces and packing down to the size of a beer can, the device seemingly offers a weight-saving solution. But while making it possible for climbers to get to the ground with fewer rappels and thus descend faster, the mechanism it uses could prove risky and make rappelling more dangerous. We tested it out to see if the pros outweigh the cons.

The design of the Escaper is simple but brilliant. There’s a four-foot section of dry-treated dynamic climbing rope with a Dyneema wrap, a bungee cord, and an attachment loop at the bottom. Thread the end of the Escaper through the anchor and then all the way down through the Dyneema wrap, which resembles a friction hitch. Tie your main rope to the attachment loop below the Dyneema wrap. As with a Chinese finger trap, pulling on the Dyneema wrap (or, in this case, weighting it for rappel) causes it to tighten, effectively locking it in place. The rappeller can then descend. 

Once on the ground, it’s time to get your rope back. Pulling and releasing the rope sharply causes the bungee to stretch and then spring back up, moving the Dyneema wrap along with it. With each pull and release, the Dyneema wrap inches down the Escaper rope. Yank the rope enough times (Beal says it takes a minimum of eight, but in our testing it was closer to 12) and the friction hitch inches right off the end of the Escaper. The device’s rope segment slides through the anchors, and the Escaper and climbing rope fall to where you can retrieve them.

Beal isn’t just marketing this as an emergency tool; the company envisions it as a tool for competent climbers familiar with the terrain to routinely make full-length, single-rope rappels, lightening their packs and getting to the ground faster. “The name is Escaper, so it is first a backup device,” says a Beal representative. “But when you know the routes, you can use the Escaper as a standard way to rappel with a single rope. So it’s a back-up system, but not only a backup system.”

Holding a Rappel

The device is designed to come unattached after a rappel, which raises the question: Could that happen during a rappel? Rappels are rarely straight or free-hanging. Climbers will likely unweight or partially unweight the rope as they come to ledges or bulges. Theoretically, unweighting the rope mid-rappel could mimic the yanking and releasing action that makes the Escaper inch over itself and ultimately release. In the instruction manual, Beal requires a consistent weight of ten kilograms (22 pounds) to keep the bungee taught, but how do you know if you’re exerting the minimum amount of force on the device to keep it engaged?

Asked whether unweighting the rope could mimic the pull-release motion of rope retrieval, the Beal representative says, “It is possible, which is why we say you need to maintain ten kilograms of weight on the rope.”

But the representative adds that “the pull and release actions are very active movements,” meaning that they should be quicker and more forceful than those used when unweighting the rope during a rappel.

Backing It Up

Beal recommends using a backup knot and a testing system for each rappel: fix the Escaper with a knot at the end of the rope segment and send your partner down while you stay at the anchors to make sure that the friction hitch doesn’t move during rappel and does move when yanked for retrieval. Then you can remove the knot and rap down. This requires communication between you and your partner, which isn’t always possible. Consider this situation: You notice a problem during your partner's rappel, but your partner is now 200 feet below and out of earshot. What are you to do?

With respect to that scenario, the Beal representative says that the Escaper isn’t any different from a typical two-rope rappel. “What can you do when you rappel with your two strands of half rope and the knot is stuck somewhere?” he asks. “The Escaper is as efficient as any other method to rappel down.”

Rope Retrieval

Will you reliably be able to retrieve your rope after you rappel in all conditions? Testing the Escaper as a demo on a trade-show floor—as Ed Crothers, who directs the American Mountain Guides Association climbing-instructor program, did—went smoothly. But that was under ideal conditions. “It was in a free-hanging, vertical orientation, attached to an eyebolt, which nearly eliminates the friction that would be found in many climbing situations," Crothers says. “I still have a lot of questions.”

For instance: What happens when you factor in the weight of a full 60- or 70-meter rope or a wet rope? What if the rope runs over ledges, cracks, or slabs, causing friction? In the field, yanking your rope won't always be as easy as it is in a demo situation—and if you’re more than one rope length off the ground, getting your rope back is essential.

Our team of testers—me and several experienced climbers and canyoneers, including Spencer McBride, a guide in Zion National Park—used this device in several situations: on a test anchor at chest height, on single-pitch climbs, and on multi-pitch climbs with one big rappel to the ground. In all these situations, the rope ran straight, with few ledges and little contact with the rock, and the Escaper performed perfectly, staying put during rappel and coming free after about a dozen harsh tugs from the ground. However, we couldn't mimic a long, jerky rappel, weighting and unweighting the rope, without abandoning our backup protocol, which none of us felt comfortable doing.

As for retrieving the rope after rappel, we found that pulling a 70-meter rope with the added resistance of the Escaper was quite similar to pulling the added weight of a second 70-meter rope on a standard double-rope rappel. The biggest difficulty for me was getting the snap of the pull-release motion, especially with more than half the rope out. It requires a powerful, coordinated, full-body motion at odds with the slow and controlled method of pulling ropes in a standard rappel.  

The Escaper isn’t the first device of its kind. In the late fifties, French climber and inventor Pierre Allain created the Decrocheur Allain, a metal device with a spring-loaded hook that popped off the anchor as soon as it was unweighted. It never caught on. A similar approach involves hooking a standard piece of aid-climbing gear called a fifi hook to the anchor—it, too, requires consistent weight during the entire rappel. Some climbing guides use a special rope hitch that comes undone with a few pulls, but it has resulted in at least one death.

The Escaper is the first device designed to allow the user to unweight the rope multiple times before it releases. And unlike similar tools and tricks, Beal is claiming it isn’t just a last-ditch emergency device. As the Beal representative says, Beal wants the Escaper to become a regular part of the experienced climber’s kit.

For Ron Funderburke, education director at the American Alpine Club, it’s the lack of certain caveats and concerns in Beal’s instruction manual that are the cause skepticism. “They don’t mention icy conditions. They don’t mention vegetated or loose terrain, where the Escaper could dislodge debris or get stuck,” he says. “Are we to believe that none of these circumstances impose conditions on the Escaper’s use?” (Though as the Beal representative told Outside, “Beal feels like they covered this in their product-use guidelines,” pointing to a bullet in the instruction manual that warns that "in wet or icy conditions the system will become more susceptible to abrasion and lose strength.”)

With the device so new and testing limited, it’s nearly impossible to answer many of these safety concerns right now. In the meantime, most of the professionals we spoke with encourage climbers and canyoneers to think of the Escaper as an emergency-only device rather than a replacement for a conventional rappelling setup. More important, they emphasize that only advanced and experienced climbers should use it.

“In the hands of the unaware or incompetent, this device could be deadly,” Crothers says. “But if over time it proves itself to be a viable, versatile tool, then it could be a game changer.”

Is Endurance Training Killing Your Strength?

With a few adjustments, you can minimize the “interference effect” between high mileage and your ability to build muscle

The moment that lingered in my mind after a recent triathlon-science conference came from a panel discussion with “gold-medal coaches,” including Iñaki Arenal, head of the Spanish high-performance team, and Malcolm Brown, coach of the Olympic-medal-winning Brownlee brothers. I asked the coaches to name the single biggest change in elite triathlon training in 2017 compared with a decade earlier. The answers had nothing to do with wearable tech or secret workouts. Instead both gave the same answer: strength training.

Of course, endurance coaches have been preaching the benefits of strength since athletes wore togas. But the practical reality of combining endurance and strength training has always been trickier than the theory, thanks in part to an apparent “interference effect” between the two workout types. To get the best of both worlds, you have to take a closer look at the molecular signals involved in strength and endurance training—and figure out how to maximize both at the same time.

The classic study on concurrent strength and endurance training was published by Robert Hickson in 1980. After ten weeks of seriously intense endurance training, strength training, or both, the verdict was that strength training didn’t hinder endurance gains but endurance training did hinder strength gains. Here’s what the strength changes in the three groups looked like (from a graph redrawn by University of California Davis researcher Keith Baar in this paper):

(Courtesy Sports Medicine)

Initially the concurrent group gains strength, but after a while the results start to tail off and even reverse.

It’s worth noting that a top triathlete like Alistair Brownlee isn’t necessary concerned with packing on muscle—in fact, that could be a negative. Instead, according to Brown, the roughly three hours a week Brownlee spends in the gym are mainly focused on building durability, so that he can survive the 30-plus hours he spends swimming, biking, and running. The challenge is far more acute in sports like rowing, which involve huge endurance-training volumes but also require as much muscle mass as you can muster. And from a health perspective, recreational endurance athletes like me often struggle to put on and maintain muscle while racking up miles.

Hickson’s results offered evidence that the “skinny endurance athlete” phenomenon isn’t only because endurance athletes can’t be bothered to do strength training, are too tired to do it right, or are genetically wired to have no muscle. (Though all those factors probably play some role.) Instead there seems to be some underlying conflict between strength and endurance adaptations.

One explanation of the interference effect goes something like this: Resistance training activates a protein called mTOR that (through a cascade of molecular signals) results in bigger muscles. Endurance training activates a protein called AMPK that (though a different signaling cascade) produces endurance adaptations like increased mitochondrial mass. AMPK can inhibit mTOR, so endurance training blocks muscle growth from strength training.

This has been the prevailing picture for the past decade or so, based on cell culture and rodent experiments. In humans, though, it doesn’t seem to be that simple. Instead, according to Baar, one of the leaders in applying molecular biology to study training adaptations, the key point may be more straightforward. By the halfway point of the famous Hickson study, he estimates that the strength-training group was burning 2,000 calories per week in their training while the concurrent training group was burning 6,000 calories per week.

There’s now emerging evidence of an alternate molecular-signaling pathway in which metabolic stress—not just from endurance training but also from other triggers like caloric deficit, oxidative stress, and aging—hinders muscle growth. This alternate pathway involves a complex series of links between a “tumor suppressor” protein, another protein called sestrin, and various other obscure acronyms. But details aside, what’s particularly intriguing about the hypothesis is that it’s highly sensitive to the presence of the amino acid leucine, which binds to sestrin and triggers the synthesis of new muscle protein. And this, Baar says, suggests some strategies to beat (or at least minimize) the interference effect.

The solution isn’t as simple as just eating more. Even if you successfully balance caloric intake with expenditure over the course of a day, you may still end up doing your strength workouts in a low-energy state. So you need to focus on getting back into “energy balance” before hitting the gym. If you’ve been out riding for a few hours, this will take more than an energy bar and a scoop of yogurt.

The most interesting point, in my view, is Baar’s suggestion that you should design your strength workout to use heavy weights so that you reach failure after relatively few reps. This will maximize the metabolic signals for muscle growth, while minimizing the calories burned and metabolic stress. (Lifting to failure also ensures that the last few reps are done slowly, which may decrease tendon stiffness and reduce injury risk, he points out.) He advocates lifting one set for each exercise, with loads chosen to aim for the following repetition ranges:

  • Upper body, compound movements: 6–8 reps
  • Upper body, isolation movements: 6–10 reps
  • Lower body, isolation movements: 10–12 reps
  • Lower body, compound movements: 20–25 reps

As you get stronger and hit the upper end of these ranges before hitting failure, increase the weight for the next workout.

The role of leucine suggests it’s especially important to get enough protein throughout the day, to make sure that muscle-growth signals aren’t suppressed by a leucine shortage. A pre- or postworkout shake isn’t sufficient; instead aim for about 0.25 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight, four to six times a day. For a 150-pound person, that’s a small tuna sandwich and a glass of milk. If you’re training seriously, you may need a higher protein hit—0.4 grams per kilogram—to get the same effect.

Does workout order matter? In the traditional mTOR versus AMPK picture, you’re better off doing endurance before strength training. That’s because the endurance signals only stay elevated for about an hour following exercise, while strength signals stay on for 18 to 24 hours. But in the revised picture, where metabolic stress is the key, the order of workouts is less important than your energy balance.

Finally, it’s important to point out that you shouldn’t stress about this unless you’re training pretty damn hard. As a general rule of thumb, if you’re not doing endurance training four or more times a week, or pushing your workouts (i.e., sustaining above 80 percent of VO2max), you’re unlikely to be hurting your strength gains.

Will following these tips transform scrawny endurance athletes into muscled marvels? Not overnight. But understanding what’s going on at the cellular level can help optimize our training choices, even if the immediate effects are invisible. As Baar puts it, “What we can’t see sets the parameters for what we can see.”


Discuss this post on Twitter or Facebook, sign up for the Sweat Science e-mail newsletter, and check out my forthcoming book, ENDURE: Mind, Body, and the Curiously Elastic Limits of Human Performance.

A Very Old Man for a Wolf

He was the alpha male of the first pack to live in Oregon since 1947. For years, a state biologist tracked him, collared him, counted his pups, weighed him, photographed him, and protected him. But then the animal known as OR4 broke one too many rules.

Facebook Icon

Twitter Icon

sms

email

It’s the nature of the wolf to travel. By age two, wolves of both sexes usually leave their birth packs and strike out on their own, sometimes covering hundreds of miles as they search for mates and new territory. Whatever the reason, when wolves move, they do it with intent—and quickly. Humans don’t know how they decide which way to go, but the choice is as important as any they’ll ever make.

One day in 2005 or 2006, a young, black-furred wolf in Idaho decided to head west. He swam across the Snake River to Oregon, which at the time was beyond the gray wolf’s established range. By entering the state, he walked out of anonymity and into a form of local celebrity, becoming notorious over the next few years for his bold raids on livestock and his enduring competence as a hunter, father, and survivor.

Download the Audm app for your iPhone to listen to more longform titles.

In Oregon, that male met another long-distance traveler from Idaho, a silver-gray female. This wolf had been collared by Idaho state biologists, who knew her as B300. She was born to the Timberline Pack, north of Idaho City, and it’s possible to trace her ancestry back to the state’s formal wolf reintroduction in 1996. Her great-grandmother was B23, a black wolf who was born in northern British Columbia and who dined as a pup on moose and caribou in the boreal forest. B23 was captured and moved in January of 1996 to Dagger Falls, in Idaho’s Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness. She would give birth to almost 30 pups before she was killed by federal wildlife officials in 2001 for killing a calf.

In the summer of 2006, when B300 was collared, she was probably already feeling restless. In September, two members of her pack were shot by wildlife officials after they killed a sheep and a dog. By late fall, she’d made the choice to strike out on her own. She too went west and crossed the Snake into territory as yet unclaimed by wolves.

The black wolf and B300 mated for the first time in December of 2006 or 2007—nobody knows when exactly. They settled in the high timber of the Wallowa Mountains, a kingdom of pines and wildflowers and cow pies that curves like a palisade around the agricultural communities of Joseph and Enterprise. They made a den inside a huge felled ponderosa and cared for their first round of pups, born blind and helpless in early spring. They were now officially a pack, the first to exist in Oregon for nearly 60 years.


The black wolf and B300 had been preceded by a few other wolves in Oregon, but they were the first to establish roots and start breeding. A male showed up in 1999, and its existence so perplexed state officials that they captured it, put it in a crate, and sent it back to Idaho. Still, everybody knew deportation wouldn’t work in the long run. Wolves were inevitably going to return.

Eventually, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) hired a biologist to deal with this trickle of immigrants: Russ Morgan, a lifetime wildlife manager and backwoodsman based in La Grande. While the black wolf was busy slaying elk in the Wallowas to feed his new pups, Morgan was driving the back roads of eastern Oregon at night, literally howling into the dark, looking for wolves.

Morgan, now 54, is a tracker and a hunter, by trade and spiritual avocation. He grew up outside of Bend, going after lizards with a BB gun. His native ecosystem is the juniper and sage high desert of central Oregon, a beautiful place to learn the ways of nature. He would ramble all day in the bush and come home for dinner covered in juniper pitch.

For Morgan, hunting is not about killing and winning, but rather being part of what he calls “the goods and hardships of nature.” Hunting isn’t a sport for him. There’s a lot of care and focus and silence involved when he goes into the woods with a game tag. He typically hunts elk with a longbow and makes his own arrows.

Oregon is a vast territory for a solo wolf tracker, and the new pack produced two rounds of offspring before Morgan caught up with them. Each time, the pups remained in the den for a month or so, tiny and clumsy at first, then increasingly playful and bold. Their mother would stay close, nursing and minding them, even consuming their urine and feces to keep the den clean until they were big enough to go outside. Meanwhile, her mate kept her fed. Eventually, both parents would return to the hunt, bringing food back in their bellies, which they’d throw up as a steamy stew for the pups to eat—a technique biologists call “regurgitative provisioning.”

By three months, the pups were ready to learn the basics of hunting from their parents and older siblings. By nine months, the most adventurous were ready to leave. Others might stay with the family for up to four or five years, helping hunt and care for younger siblings before deciding to strike out on their own. In essence, a wolf pack is a family, often with aunts, uncles, grandparents, and multiple generations of pups worked into the mix.

In 2009, a field team of fish biologists doing a stream survey sent Morgan a cell phone recording of barking and howling. Morgan knew wolf sounds when he heard them, so he drove to the site and started tracking the pack’s prints and scat. Before long, he was able to trap the gray female and collar her with a VHF radio transmitter. Idaho’s B300 became Oregon’s OR2. Now Morgan could monitor the pack from the comfort of his truck, driving around Wallowa County with a portable receiver.

The 2 in OR2 means she was the second wolf collared in Oregon. A male designated OR1, who had a companion—probably a sibling—had been collared in eastern Baker County a few months earlier. When the duo began killing livestock—slaughtering at least 20 sheep in one night—and didn’t respond to deterrents like a collar-activated noise box, the ODFW decided they had to be destroyed.

At this point, decisions about hunting down a wolf were entirely the prerogative of the agency. So Morgan made the call, guided by an ODFW document called the Wolf Conservation and Management Plan, a bureaucratic blueprint that codified how this newly returned symbol of all things wild was to be handled in a landscape of cattle, timber, rock climbers, rivers thick with rafts, and hikers.

About a month after OR2 got her new name and collar, she and the black male, along with their pups, were eating an elk carcass that lay partially submerged in a minor stream called Grouse Creek, about ten miles from Hells Canyon—the especially deep river gorge that separates Oregon and Idaho. Wolves keep to the high ground, as a rule; Morgan calls them “ridge walkers.” But their long, drawn-out pursuits tend to follow gravity downhill, and a lot of prey end up in the bottom of a valley or draw, exhausted, wet, and doomed.

Morgan and a friend hiked down to the creek and saw what Morgan describes as “a whole wad of wolves blowing out.” The female and the pups fled, but the big male stopped 30 yards away from the carcass and turned to face them, howling, barking, and growling. He was black as a starless night and in the prime of his youth.

“He just lit up,” Morgan recalls. “He was so loud you couldn’t hear yourself think.” Morgan pulled out his digital camera and took a few pictures. The wolf ran off.

Man and wolf would meet many times. Sometimes Morgan would count his pups. Sometimes he would chase him with a rifle loaded with tranquilizers, other times with a rifle loaded with bullets. Over the next seven years, they would start turning gray together.


Six months after their first meeting, on February 12, 2010, the black male got a collar and a name. Morgan used the signal from OR2 to track the family by helicopter. When he found the wolves, he had to try and pick the alpha male out of a half-dozen adult-sized wolves coursing through the rocky defiles of Road Canyon in lower Grouse Creek, just a few miles from the elk site. It was easy enough to spot OR2, and she had a companion running beside her, keeping close. Morgan figured he’d found his alpha.

Wolves are so fast—they can do bursts of 38 miles per hour, ten faster than Usain Bolt—that Morgan’s helicopter pilot struggled to keep up, while Morgan, leaning out the door, tried desperately to get a clear shot at the alpha’s rump. Suddenly, the big black wolf tripped over brush and rolled in a somersault. When he righted himself, he sat down and started barking and howling at the chopper, inadvertently concealing his backside.

(ODFW)

“When he flipped over, I could see the rotor wash flattening his hair,” Morgan says. “He was frustrated. He gets pretty frustrated when he is being chased.” Finally, the wolf stood and Morgan got a shot off. Darted, the animal slowed, sat, and then went to sleep in the snow. The terrain was too steep to land, so the pilot dipped into the ravine, where Morgan stepped out with his kit. The helicopter took off, and Morgan shared a moment with the unconscious alpha. As he weighed him—115 pounds, the largest wolf ever recorded in Oregon—took blood samples, and affixed tags and a collar, the black wolf officially became OR4, a wild animal with a name. A wild animal with his DNA on file.

OR2 wasn’t happy about any of it. She stood a couple hundred yards away while Morgan worked, howling continuously.


The Wallowa Valley, cradled by mountains, was once the home of the Wallowa band of the Nez Percé, and one of its two principal communities is Joseph, named after Chief Joseph, or Hinmatówyalahtqit—Thunder Rises as it Goes. There’s a statue of Chief Joseph in town, and there’s a rodeo named after him, but his descendants are based out of the Colville Indian Reservation in eastern Washington, with the members of 11 other tribes. They were forced to move by the U.S. Army in 1877 so white men could raise livestock here.

“We were like deer. They were like grizzly bears,” Chief Joseph wrote in his autobiography. “We had a small country. Their country was large. We were contented to let things remain as the Great Spirit Chief made them. They were not; and would change the rivers and mountains if they did not suit them.”

The white men built roads, mines, and mills; they divvied up leased federal land for grazing. Today, a quarter of the jobs in Wallowa County are in agriculture or timber, and much of the work involves running cattle or growing hay. During the first few decades of the 20th century, ranchers eradicated the grizzly bear and wolf to make the land safe for livestock. The last known griz was spotted in the western Wallowa Mountains in 1938. The last wolf bounty paid out in Oregon was in 1947.

Sixty years isn’t such a long time—it’s the average age of a Wallowa County rancher—yet perhaps the return of wolves to Oregon would have gone over better if it had taken 200. As it was, only a couple of generations had passed. To the children and grandchildren of the old wolf slayers, reintroduction seemed like an insult. “It tells them that their heritage was wrong,” Morgan says, “that it was a mistake to make those wolves go away.”

(Emma Marris)

So OR4 was already on the wrong side of the local ranching community, just by existing. It didn’t help when he and other members of the pack—called the Imnaha pack, after the Imnaha River at the core of their territory—were drawn closer to the world of man by bone piles.

Most ranches have bone piles, or dead piles, which are central locations for piling up the carcasses of dead livestock, since burial requires using heavy machinery. By 2010, the Imnaha wolves were lingering at these places, playing with hides, chewing on leg bones, and generally luxuriating in the cozy atmosphere of decaying mammals. And then they started to look around at the placid creatures on the hoof nearby, so much less dangerous to pursue than elk, which can break a wolf’s jaw or rib with a muscular kick.

OR4 and OR2 had what was probably their third litter of pups in April of 2010. There were at least four. These arrivals joined roughly eight other offspring, now all full-sized and actively hunting. The family was getting big.

Data from Yellowstone suggests that every wolf will kill, on average, two elk per month in the winter. Each elk is generally taken down by two or three wolves. Wolves’ teeth are surprisingly blunt instruments; they often kill by inducing massive internal bleeding. A cougar pounces on its prey and kills it instantly by breaking its neck or slicing open a carotid artery, but a wolf chases an animal until it collapses, then basically beats it to death with its jaws.

Once the elk is down, the wolves unzip it, and first eat the heart, lungs, liver, intestines, spleen, and kidneys. Then they get to work on the meaty legs. Each wolf requires at least seven pounds of food per day, so a good-sized pack needs to kill an elk every two or three days.

Keeping up with this pace of consumption demands endurance. One day in the spring of 2010, when OR4 was in his prime, he killed an elk 33 miles from his den and then ran home in six hours, his belly full of meat to throw up to feed his pups. That meant a 66-mile round trip in rough country—with a vigorous elk hunt in the middle.

In the spring and summer, when the snow has melted and elk have left the hills, wolves diversify their diets, eating deer, rodents, and whatever else they can get. Pickings are slim, except down in the valleys, near all those irresistible bone piles. In early spring, when the pups are hungry, much of the game is found in lowland pastures, sharing grass with cattle. The pack killed its first calf on May 6, 2010. By the end of May, five were dead.

But just as the ODFW began handing out permits to local ranchers allowing them to shoot stock-killing wolves on sight—and calling the U.S. Agriculture Department’s Wildlife Services, the agency that specializes in killing vermin and problem predators—the pack changed its tactics and retreated to the mountains. Everything got quiet for a while. OR4’s collar went dead. The snows came and went. More pups were born.

The next year, in May of 2011, the pack—now totaling about 15—started killing calves again, and the ODFW decided to kill two members to reduce the number of mouths OR4 had to feed. ODFW staffers set out traps and went on the hunt with guns. One of OR4’s sons was trapped and killed; a daughter was shot.

By this time, Morgan knew OR4’s own distinctive paw print: the wolf’s left hind foot had a broken toe that stuck out 90 degrees. Morgan found this print and set a trap directly on top of it. As he thought might happen, OR4 himself was caught. Because he was the breeding male, his life was spared, but Morgan took the opportunity to knock him out with a “jab pole”—a tranquilizer on a stick—and outfit him with a working collar, this one equipped with GPS. The state of Oregon began to download OR4’s whereabouts four times a day.

For the next five years, the ODFW often knew exactly where he was, to within 100 meters. But there were gaps, because OR4 was very hard on collars. He probably banged them against rocks and logs during chases, maybe took an occasional elk hoof right in the neck. Some of his collars didn’t last a month.


In an attempt to pacify angry ranchers across the West, the conservation group Defenders of Wildlife established a fund in 1987 to compensate producers who lost animals to wolves—but only if a state agency ruled that the death was clearly caused by one. Later, the state of Oregon set up its own fund.

Morgan was integral to this system. He started posting official reports of his depredation investigations after local ranchers began to contest his findings. OR4’s file grew thicker and thicker. Over time, as the workload got to be too much, Morgan took on an assistant: Roblyn Brown, a methodical, capable field biologist with a passion for advanced data analysis. She became his heir apparent as wolf coordinator.

Sometimes, the kills Morgan was called out on were old, especially when the victims were animals out grazing on public land. One report reads: “The carcass had been mostly consumed by scavengers, with sign of wolves, bear, and coyote present. The carcass consisted mostly of bones and a large piece of hide, with muscle remaining for examination only on the head, neck, and lower legs.”

This kill was ruled “probable wolf” because of the cow’s location in a dry rocky creek bottom. There were signs that it had been chased downhill, and purple bruising on the carcass indicated hemorrhaging under the skin before death—from those crushing, blunt teeth.

Sometimes the kills were fresh, the evidence overwhelming. One morning in December of 2012, a rancher heard the alarm sound on a telemetry receiver that Morgan had given him, to alert him when OR4 was in the area. But he didn’t need the box. He could hear the wolves howling, and when he found a dead cow, it was still warm. It had run for a half-mile before being taken down, and Morgan noted “blood and rumen smears on the ground, blood stains on the vegetation, hair tufts, muscle fibers, and vegetation and soil disturbances.” He ruled it a confirmed wolf kill.

Some deaths were mysteries, like this one from September of 2011: “Carcass was mostly intact; there was no sign of injury (broken bones) or marks on the outside of the cow. Maggots were present in large numbers. There was scavenging (coyote tracks were present) on the right side of the head and around anus. There was no evidence of a predator attack. The cause of death of the cow is unknown, but unrelated to predation.”

No matter what Morgan found, and despite the fact that wolf losses represented a tiny fraction of livestock mortality, the ranchers stayed angry. This took a toll. Morgan would come home from work to his partner, Dana, a wildfire emergency coordinator who’s now his wife, eat dinner, make some arrows, go to sleep, and head back to work the next morning without speaking a word.

Morgan didn’t just investigate depredations; he orchestrated a multi-pronged deterrence campaign. He outfitted ranchers with alert systems linked to OR4’s collar, so they could defend their livestock. He spent many a day and night up on a hill in the valley with the telemetry setup, so they could haze wolves heading into the valley. In 2010, he started working to do away with bone piles. Today, the Wallowa County landfill takes cattle carcasses for free.

Despite his efforts, in the fall of 2011, OR4 and his family killed once too often, a calf taken down near Griffith Creek on private land. It belonged to Todd Nash, the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association wolf committee chairman and a longtime opponent of wolf reintroduction.“Blood from the calf was scattered over a large area both inside and outside an old broken-down corral,” the report read. “Within the corral were multiple areas of blood, hair tufts, and sign that the calf had gone down (and then back up) at least once before its death.”

GPS data placed OR4 at the scene. According to the wolf plan, chronically depredating wolves were to be killed, even though wolves were still on the state endangered species list. Though the vast majority of the food OR4 was eating was wild game, he was killing stock often enough that “chronic” seemed like the appropriate adjective. He had to go.


When Morgan applied to be Oregon’s wolf coordinator, he had already been a wildlife manager for 20 years. He’d captured cougars and counted fish and blocked development that threatened a rare ground squirrel. He knew wolves would be controversial. But he believed in the wolf plan—a document that doesn’t do one thing that many environmentalists wished it would: take on the institution of grazing on public lands. This practice is as hot a potato as you can find in the West, up there with who gets water and how much timber to cut. The ODFW Commission, which wrote the plan, explains in the preamble that it has no authority over grazing issues. The overall goal was “to ensure the conservation of gray wolves as required by Oregon law while protecting the social and economic interests of all Oregonians.” It aimed to be a compromise. “Non-lethal and lethal control activities actually may promote the long-term survival of the wolf by enhancing tolerance,” the commission wrote. Put another way: the price of having wolves is killing wolves.

It was this plan that Morgan now carried out. Using the coordinates from OR4’s collar, he determined that the wolf was hunkered down in a thick stand of small pines, not far from a forest road, probably waiting out a rain shower. Morgan put his rifle on a bipod uphill from the stand and sent Brown around the back to flush the wolves toward him. He heard movement—wolves approaching. He rotated his head to scan down the face of the pines, and when he looked back, OR4 was standing right in front on him, completely exposed. But the wolf didn’t stay still long.

“Just as I was getting the crosshairs on him, he vanished,” Morgan says.

Brown emerged from the pines and they set up for another try, getting ahead of the collar signal, which was now moving down a canyon. It was drizzling and cloudy. Morgan had kind of a “sick feeling” as they sat there, then Brown checked her phone. There was a text message: “Stand down. Judge has issued a stay.”

Three environmental groups had sued to stop the ODFW from killing OR4. Their central claim was that the state could not legally kill an animal on the Oregon endangered species list. They also convinced the Oregon Court of Appeals to issue an emergency stay while their suit went forward. A stay like this has to be based on some “irreparable harm” that will occur if it’s not put in place; since wolves don’t have legal standing, it was granted in part to prevent irreparable harm to the members of the three environmental groups, who would be denied “the ‘profound and exhilarating’ experience of viewing wolves in the wild, including the particular wolves targeted for killing.”

(ODFW)

Morgan is a believer in the idea that wild animals must be managed as populations. “I try not to get emotionally involved with particular individuals,” he says. “If that wolf had come out in a place where we could have pulled the trigger, we would have pulled the trigger. You have to focus on the task at hand and get it done, desensitize yourself. One of the things we’re thinking is that wolves are going to be OK in Oregon, and this is part of management. It is what we signed up for when we did the wolf plan.”

With OR4 and his pack safe for the time being, Morgan continued to investigate depredations and tried to keep a working collar on his alpha. Life went on. OR4’s pups grew up and left home. One of his sons, OR7, traveled all the way to California in December of 2011, briefly becoming an international celebrity. Another, OR9, went to Idaho and was shot by a hunter with an expired wolf tag. A third, OR33, was found shot to death near Klamath Falls, Oregon, in April 2017. A fourth, OR12, took over the remote Wenaha pack in 2012 and is still the breeding male there.

A fifth, OR3, disappeared in 2011 and was presumed dead. But in the summer of 2015, he showed up on a trail camera in Klamath County, hundreds of miles to the southwest. He found a mate, and they had a single pup. When the pup was about six months old, a poacher killed OR3’s mate. Now the father and son are believed to live together near Silver Lake, in Lake County.

As for OR4, in March of 2012, he was tranquilized from a helicopter again and re-collared. Every spring, new pups were born; every year, older offspring dispersed. The pack dined mostly on elk, but occasionally on calves.

In May of 2013, the lawsuit that prompted the stay on OR4’s death sentence ended with a settlement agreement among the environmental groups, the state, and the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association. New rules were incorporated into the wolf plan. The threshold for killing a wolf was explicitly spelled out, and it would get lower and lower as the wolf population expanded. While there were still fewer than four breeding pairs in the state, they would be managed under “Phase One” rules: a wolf could be killed if a pack was implicated in four depredations within six months and if non-lethal control attempts had already been tried.

After these changes were in place, the Imnaha pack somehow skirted the line, never quite taking enough livestock to earn a death sentence. Ranchers joked that the wolves kept a copy of the settlement posted inside the den.


A few months after the settlement, OR2’s collar went dead. She was never seen again. In February of 2014, OR4 got his fourth collar. Every time he was darted from the air, he seemed smarter. It was getting harder and harder to bring him down.

“We—humans—collar lots of animals,” Morgan says. “Mostly because we are trying to learn. We collar wolves for a different reason—because we are fearful. We want to keep track of them. That is fundamentally different than trying to understand them.”

By 2014, OR4 was an old wolf, largely gray. His teeth were worn. He had sired more than 30 pups. OR2 was gone, and he was now seen with a female that had an obvious limp. Yet he carried on.

And then, in January of 2015, the rules changed again. Annual counts indicated that there were officially enough wolf breeding pairs in Oregon for the wolf plan to move to a new phase. Now, the ODFW could authorize lethal control at a the request of a property owner or rancher with a permit to graze on public land after just two depredations in a row.

This time, the Imnaha pack got on the wrong side of the rules in a hurry. In the spring of 2016, the pack—now down to four animals—killed a 500-pound steer calf in the Upper Swamp Creek area. The same day it happened, Brown saw OR4 and his mate, nicknamed Limpy, from a helicopter over the Zumwalt Prairie, a favorite hunting ground. Neither wolf had a working collar, so she loaded up her rifle with a tranquilizer dart.

OR4 didn’t run. Two years earlier, Brown had collared him and he ran across the ground “like the wind.” Now he just loped across the landscape, turned, and barked twice.

Brown pulled the trigger ruefully. She and Morgan had talked about their reluctance to collar OR4 again, but with the animal in sight, her duty was to act. No wolf in the pack was collared. He was right there. Later, when Morgan got a text from Brown that OR4 had been fitted with his fifth collar, his heart sank. The noose was tightening.

A few weeks after the new collar went on, the pack killed a ram. Then a calf. And then another. And then another ram. At this point, they had blown past the minimum depredations for lethal control. On March 25, 2016, the ODFW received an official request from a rancher to have them killed.

On March 31, Morgan, his bosses at the ODFW, and his staff held a meeting. The consensus was that the rash of depredations and collar signals from the valley floor suggested that an aging OR4 was going after easy targets and would probably continue to do so. It was even possible that a younger and stronger wolf had pushed him out of his core territory. It was clear to everyone that, under the wolf plan, OR4, his mate, and two offspring that made up his current pack had to go. Morgan made the official recommendation.

“It is not retribution or justice,” Morgan says of the decision. “It is solving a problem.”

OR4’s ancestors didn’t ask to be relocated to the lower 48. And while gray wolves have arguably restored a lost component to western ecosystems, they returned to a place much changed—a place full of people, of fat hornless cattle, of snack-sized sheep, of rubber bullets and range riders and firecrackers and helicopters and tranquilizers and traps and collars and GPS signals and government regulations. OR4 never failed as a wolf. He broke human rules. And in the 21st century, being a competent wolf isn’t enough to stay alive. You must also—impossibly—know your place.

Since there were already ODFW staff in the area with a helicopter, Morgan left it to them to kill the wolves. OR4 was old; his mate was limping; they had fresh GPS collars transmitting their whereabouts. It wasn’t hard to find them. ODFW staff herded them out of a steep drainage canyon, thick with timber, into the open. The young wolves split off, and neither of them had collars, so the crew pursued them first. Once they were both dead, the staff relocated OR4 and Limpy. The pair ran from the helicopter, their speed limited by the female’s injury. The people hunting them down were firing buckshot loads. They flew directly above the wolves and shot each one in the head. Within two hours of the official decision, the entire pack was gone.

OR4 was probably a month shy of his 11th birthday—a very old man for a wolf.


The wolves’ bodies were collected. OR4 was still heavy, his head robust, rounded, and gray. “You could tell he was an older, dominant-type wolf,” says the man who carried him, who asked not to be identified. They were loaded into a cargo net and taken back by helicopter. Next, the carcasses were displayed to the local sheriff—a protocol put in place because of the lack of trust between the state agency and local authorities, and a ritual Morgan found repellent. Then staffers brought the dead wolves back to the ODFW offices in La Grande. All their collars and tags were removed.

A backhoe was used to dig a grave for the four wolves. But first, Morgan collected OR4’s skull. Wolf skulls, bones, and pelts are often collected for research and education. In this case, Morgan also believed the skull of such a historically important wolf should be preserved at the ODFW headquarters in Salem. For him, saving it is a deep mark of respect.

After OR4 was killed, Morgan got a condolence note from Todd Nash. It read: “I will have to admit, I was hoping OR4 would die of old age. After all, he was just a wolf trying to make a living, and I admired that.”

Nash didn’t hate the wolf. He hated the reintroduction effort. KPIC Channel 4 of Roseburg, Oregon, called him for a response to the killing. “We spend so much money trapping, collaring, and helicopter guarding, and one thing and another,” he told the reporter. “Then they end up killing the darn things. Because we can’t coexist with them. That’s the plain and simple fact. This pack should have been removed a long time ago.”

OR4 was a dominant leader, a skilled hunter, and an excellent father, according to Morgan. Seven of the state’s 17 packs have alphas that are his sons, daughters, or granddaughters. OR4's descendants also founded California’s first wolf pack since the 1920s—the Shasta pack. Above all else, the big black wolf was supremely competent. “He epitomizes all things wolf,” Morgan says.

A few days after OR4 was killed, Morgan’s partner, Dana, went to the hospital with a blood clot in her shoulder. As he sat with her, Morgan’s heart began racing. A passing doctor took a listen and hustled him into the emergency room. It wasn’t a heart attack, just some kind of transitory tachycardia. Doctors told him to avoid stress.

After a few months spent mostly at his desk, working on a revision of the wolf plan, Morgan retired on September 15, 2017. He described himself as being “tired of the negativity and heartache that is wolf management in a modern world.”

Brown has taken over as acting wolf coordinator. On her computer screen is a map of the most recent whereabouts of the 15 or so collared wolves in the state of Oregon, like a flight-control display for Canis lupus.

On Morgan’s last outing into the field before his retirement, he visited the den that belonged to OR4. The den itself is a huge ponderosa pine log, hollow from one end to the other. At one time, 15 wolves would have called this place home. On this summer day, the clearing was still.

Morgan pulled out a coarse gray wolf hair snagged on the log. There was some old scat still among the lupines and wild strawberries, and a sprinkling of bleached bones. “I don’t have any remorse for killing them, but I am sad they aren’t here,” he said.

Before he left, he picked up an elk skull from the clearing. He placed it firmly in the center of the den’s opening. And then he walked away.

Emma Marris (@emma_marris) is the author of Rambunctious Garden: Saving Nature in a Post-Wild World. This story was supported by a grant from the Institute for Journalism and Natural Resources. Marris lives in Klamath, Oregon. 

Illustration by Molly Mendoza (@msmollym)

Do New "Energy Return" Shoes Put Pep in Your Step?

Click:查微信注册手机号
>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

Not too long ago, it felt like the sun was setting for cushioned running shoes. In 2009, following the example of Christopher McDougall and his barefoot-running manifesto, Born to Run, devotees were debating whether to purchase a pair of Vibram FiveFingers or just be a full-on savage and go au naturel from the ankles down. Foam was for chumps.

Things have changed. It turned out FiveFingers weren’t a panacea for everyone’s running woes after all. Soon, the pendulum was swinging the other way. Hoka One One lead the charge with its bloated shoes. Last year, as part of its effort to back a sub-two-hour marathon attempt, Nike released the Zoom Vaporfly 4%, a shoe with a tall 31-millimeter heel stack height that contradicted the very idea of a racing “flat.” Despite its robust appearance, the Vaporfly 4% weighed only 6.5 ounces, placing it well within the range of a typical marathon racing shoe.

Just a few short years ago, foam was the enemy. Today, it’s being touted as a crucial ingredient to help elite runners achieve times that were once unthinkable.

What gives?

Well, the shoes, for one. The relative softness of a midsole cushioning system is a crucial factor for the concept of “energy return,” a phrase that has only recently entered the lexicon of running shoe efficacy. Energy return denotes the amount of energy that shoe is able to retain when force is exerted upon it by a runner’s stride. The ideal cushioning system, so the thinking goes, will provide a sweet spot between stiffness and compliance, creating a springboard effect to help drive forward momentum. (I think the scientific term for this is “bounciness.”) And some brands are tinkering with and tweaking the traditional midsole recipe to get that desired mix.

Anyway, in light of this foam renaissance, I tested three different running shoes that all make bold claims about their respective cushioning systems: the Brooks Levitate, the Nike Epic React Flyknit, and the Under Armour HOVR Sonic.

26mm
18mm
8mm
11.2 ounces
$150

For the Levitate, Brooks enlisted the help of chemical company BASF, which sneaker aficionados might recognize as the company behind Adidas’ lauded Boost foam. Like Boost, the Levitate eschews the traditional ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) foam in favor of springier polyurethane (PU), which is encased in a thin of layer of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) to prevent it from compressing and losing its cushioning. Brooks has dubbed this its “DNA AMP” midsole.

“A shoe engineered to provide the most energy return of leading performance running shoes…the foundation of DNA AMP is a PU foam that naturally expands, returning energy as force is applied.”

Buy Now


27mm
18mm
9mm
8.45 ounces
$150

The Epic React Flyknit incorporates Nike’s new Epic React foam. A non-EVA material, this foam has a synthetic rubber as its primary ingredient and shares the light, soft, and responsive qualities of its ZoomX predecessor, adding an element of durability.

“Nike React foam gives 13 percent greater energy return than Nike Lunar foam, while still delivering a soft and snappy ride.”

Buy Now


21mm
13mm
8mm
9.6 ounces
$100

The foam compound at the heart of the HOVR Sonic midsole was developed in partnership with Dow Chemical, using a proprietary blend (neither EVA nor PU) to create a material that Dow has dubbed Infuse.To maximize energy return, the HOVR foam system is encased in a webby mesh fabric.

“The UA HOVR foam chemistry has a super-soft durometer that is contained by the UA Energy Web for ultimate energy return and responsiveness.”

Buy Now

I should mention at the outset that running shoes are a matter of individual preference. Whether a shoe works for you will depend on a number of subjective factors, including your gait, the shape of your foot, and how much cushioning you need. (For what it’s worth, I’m an unapologetic heel-striking, neutral pronator who wears a regular—as opposed to wide—shoe.) This makes testing running shoes fundamentally different than testing, say, the thermoregulatory capabilities of different canteens, where an objective metric can be more easily applied. The running style of the wearer will always be the most significant variable in any running shoe test.

That said, when trying to compare the cushioning systems of various shoe models, an additional challenge arises: No cushioning system exists in isolation. If one really wanted to perform a test to assess only which shoe’s foam provides the best energy return, one would have to devise a way to neutralize all the other components of the shoe, like upper construction, weight, etc.

Some testers have taken great pains to mitigate such variables by subjecting shoes to mechanical testing methods in a lab. While impressive, it’s debatable how useful this information is for the everyday runner. After all, what matters most is how a cushioning system works in combination with all other aspects of a shoe.

With that in mind, I ran in the three shoes listed here at three different paces on three different surfaces. Rather than trying to come up with a definitive ranking (as in: “buy this shoe, not that one”), the idea was to determine which shoe was best suited for which activity.

For this test, I ran two sets of 800 meters (two laps) in each pair of shoes around a rubberized outdoor track. I wanted a pace that, while significantly quicker than my marathon tempo, would still feel comfortable enough that I wouldn’t have to strain too hard to run even splits. I settled on 2 minutes 40 seconds for each interval.

No big surprise here. With a weight of only 8.45 ounces, the Nike Epic React had the clear edge for this test, and overall, hitting my goal pace felt the most effortless when I wore these shoes. (Anticipating this, I made sure to run in the Nike shoes last, figuring it was only fair to run in the lightest shoes when my legs would be least fresh.) The 27-millimeter heel height was also a factor. I tend to run more up on my forefoot when I’m running short, fast stuff, and the Epic React gives you a noticeable, if slight, forward lean.

This is not to say that I couldn’t crank out decent 800s in the other two pairs of shoes, but both felt heavier on my feet. While I was expecting this from the Brooks Levitate, the Under Armour HOVR Sonic had a listed weight of only 9.6 ounces, which is almost racing-flat territory. When I went home and put the HOVR on the kitchen scale, my men’s size 10.5 shoe came in at 11.2 ounces. (Granted, the listed size is usually a men’s size 9 or 10, but this discrepancy shouldn’t manifest itself in an additional 1.6 ounces; both the other shoes were within a half-ounce of their listed weight when I weighed them on the scale.)

Recovery and easy runs are a crucial part of any runner’s routine, so I wanted to incorporate that into this test. I ran the same paved eight-mile course in each pair of shoes, going at a leisurely pace, between eight and 8.5 minutes per mile.

While the Brooks Levitate is, for my taste at least, a little too soft for more aggressive runs, I loved this shoe for a recovery day semi-jog. Of the three models on this list, the cushioning in the Levitate is the most noticeable to the wearer: There’s a discernable squish from the very first step, but still enough firmness to provide that elusive “snappy ride,” to borrow the most overused of all running shoe descriptors. For a luxurious amble of a run, the Brooks Levitate is your shoe.

Overall, the Under Armour HOVR Sonic felt rather firm for easy running (although I appreciated the way the shoe’s meshy sock liner encased my foot), while jogging in the Nike Epic React feels somehow off, like you’re idling through a school zone in a Lamborghini.

I’m not big on treadmills, but one advantage they offer is that they make it very easy to standardize testing conditions. I ran for 20 minutes in each pair at a 7:30 pace and a 1 percent incline. For me, this pace represents a moderate effort—not hard, but also not entirely relaxed.

Once again, I made sure to run in the Epic React last, and once again, these shoes provided the most effortless ride when the pace picked up. The extreme monotony of the treadmill experience can help you notice things you wouldn’t necessarily when running outside. Hence, this test amplified the characteristics of each shoe; the Brooks Levitate felt extra soft, while the Under Armour HOVR felt noticeably firm.


What it came down to was this: Despite each company making big claims on the energy-return front, the Nike model was the only one that gave me some palpable sense of flinging forward as I ran. Again, this sensation of bounciness could very likely just be due to the Epic React’s stack height or that it’s more than two ounces lighter than the other two models, as opposed to being the consequence of some magical property of the React foam. But of course the very fact that the shoe can simultaneously be so light and so cushioned is part of what makes the cushioning system so impressive.

I have to hand it to Nike. While I hate to be a cheerleader for the big dog on the running shoe scene, one should give credit where it’s due. The Epic React is a marvel, both from an aesthetic and functionality standpoint and, unlike the bank-breaking Vaporfly 4%, is reasonably priced at $150.

I haven’t run in the Epic React long enough to say much about its durability claims, but I think this shoe is going to be a trendsetter. Going forward, there will be increasing pressure on top brands to find a way to provide wearers with shoes that manage to add cushioning while reducing overall weight. Not easy, but I think the Swoosh lords have thrown down the gauntlet this time.

15 Gifts for the Outdoorsy Mom

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

It’s impossible to express the amount of gratitude your mom deserves, but a thoughtful Mother’s Day gift is a good start, especially one that helps her get outside.

Give your mom the gift of Zen with this ultracushiony yoga mat. Made from closed-cell foam in a nontoxic manufacturing process, it’s five millimeters thick and sticky enough to prevent downward-dog slippage.

Buy Now


Dare we say the perfect midlayer? This pullover from Ridge Merino is silky to the touch, thanks to the beautiful blend of merino and Tencel. It hangs lower than traditional hoodies, making it perfect to layer over leggings.

Buy Now


Want to give Mom something handmade but don’t have time to do the dirty work yourself? No judgments here. This hand-thrown candle from Uzumati Ceramics should do the trick. We like its notes of whiskey, campfire, and leather.

Buy Now


An invaluable layer in the outdoors, the Atom hooded jacket is a favorite around the Outside offices. Synthetic insulation keeps you warm even when you get wet. The side panels are made from open-weave fleece to release body heat.

Buy Now


One of our favorite coffee vessels, the stainless-steel Rambler is lined with copper for an added insulation boost. The bottle’s opening is ergonomically designed to fit over your nose as you drink.

Buy Now


For the mom on go, this kit has everything she needs to stay fresh on the trail or during a weekend adventure. Included is Ursa Major’s face wash, face balm, face tonic, and face wipes. The company’s products are all made from natural ingredients and don’t contain harmful chemicals like petrochemicals, sulfates, synthetic fragrances, or silicones.

Buy Now


Maui Jim is known for making high-quality sunglasses you won’t want to lose, but it’s hard to make the investment with your own dollar. Buy Mom something she wouldn’t buy herself, like these Koko sunglasses. The polarized glass lenses are 20 percent thinner and lighter than traditional ones.

Buy Now


Perfect for the office and gym, this lightweight tote from Patagonia won’t weigh your mom down. It can be used as a tote or backpack and keeps everything safe with a top zipper. The front panel has an additional zippered pocket, and the side is graced with a stretchy water bottle pocket.

Buy Now


Made of synthetic insulation and a Pertex shell, the Rumpl blanket packs the heat in a small, compact package. It’s perfect for hanging around a campfire or watching a movie on the couch.

Buy Now


Help Mom get a killer Chaco tan this summer with these Mega Z Cloud sandals. The straps are thicker than traditional Chacos and feature the extra-comfy Luvseat midsole to help relieve pressure.

Buy Now


Perfect for chilly nights around the campfire, the Mountain sweatshirt stitches together three different insulating layers for a comfortable fit. The face fabric is treated with DWR to resist water and stains.

Buy Now


This skort has extra-stretchy and supportive undershorts, so it’s less restrictive and more comfortable than traditional hiking shorts. The fabric is abrasion-resistant and treated with an antimicrobial layer to resist odors.

Buy Now


If Mom is less about stuff and more about experiences, treat her to an all-women REI Adventures trip (starting at $700). You can send your mom on an all-inclusive trip to the Pacific Crest Trail, Grand Canyon, or even Machu Picchu.

Buy Now


This smartwatch is water-resistant, has a wrist-based heart rate monitor, and receives texts and calls right on the watch. The battery lasts over four days and has more than 15 modes for tracking various types of exercise.

Buy Now


Every mom deserves a little pampering on Mother’s Day. Start her day off right with this ultrasoft waffle robe that’s hand-woven in Turkey from organic cotton and has two pockets in front to hold small items.

Buy Now

Sweet Deals on Gear That Will Help You Travel the World

>

When you buy something using the retail links in our stories, we earn an affiliate commission that helps pay for our work. Read more about Outside’s affiliate policy.

This month is REI’s 80th anniversary and to celebrate they’re having the biggest sale of the year, featuring markdowns on nearly 2,000 products. The deals are on from May 18 through May 28. Here are some of the ones that caught our eyes. 

About Our Deals Coverage

We work with top retailers and brands to find the best deals on outdoor gear. Then our editors and writers carefully review the sales to select the products we’ve used and trust. When you click a Buy Now button in this story, it will take you to the brand whose sale we're covering.

Read our affiliate link policy

A blend of cotton, polyester, and spandex, the Captive is lightweight and quick drying. The polo style is cool on hot days but can also be dressed up. Truly it's one shirt that you can wear anywhere.

Buy Now


The lightweight Capilene polyester jersey of this T-shirt has superior stretch and is smooth and comfortable against the skin for cool, non-bunching comfort. The fabric is treated with odor-fighting Polygiene so you can wear it for days without washing.

Buy Now


Take your yoga on the road with the Eko SuperLite Travel yoga mat. Made from biodegradable rubber, it contains no PVC and weighs only two pounds so it can be folded to fit in your travel bag.

Buy Now


The stretchiest baselayer Patagonia makes, the Daily tank is light, airy, and breathable—perfect for traveling in tropical places.

Buy Now


The Electra daypack features a women-specific back panel and shoulder straps with a hideaway sternum strap and soft, breathable mesh. The main compartment has a fleece-lined tablet sleeve and there’s a front stretch-mesh panel for easy stashing.

Buy Now


The Modern Travel bra is a one-bra quiver with tech fabric, fully adjustable straps, and a packable, shape-retaining design.

Buy Now


Rugged, durable, and versatile, the Gear Warrior has everything we look for in large travel bag. There’s a large main compartment with compression straps, a zip mesh organizer pocket, oversize super-tread wheels, and comfortable extendable handle.

Buy Now


This three-pouch set is made of washable, odor-resistant polyester with a mesh top so you can see what's inside. The cubes compress either folded or rolled clothing items. The smaller cube can also stow electronics cords and accessories.

Buy Now


Made from quick-drying ripstop fabric, the Traveler Cargo Hybrid shorts are fully loaded with features to make your adventures less complicated. They include tricks like a hidden passport pocket and a place to hold your knife and pliers.

Buy Now


Designed for globe-trotting women, the Fairview can be carried as a backpack, as a messenger bag, or as a duffel with a padded shoulder strap. A women-specific design ensures a comfortable fit, while dual front mesh pockets, a laptop sleeve, and large zippered main compartment keep everything organized.

Buy Now


This is the bag that most Outside editors travel with. The 60-liter size is perfect for everything from short weekend trips to longer monthlong ventures. The burly, water-resistant outer shell can withstand the harshest airplane baggers and the backpack straps make it easy to carry.

Buy Now


Bigger than it looks, the 28-liter Blink has water-resistant 420-denier ripstop nylon construction that's tough enough for years of travel. A large clamshell opening makes access easy to get into while external compression straps cinch down to stabilize and streamline your load, and a side stretch pocket is perfect for a water bottle or umbrella.

Buy Now


Lots of sandals will stay on your foot even if you end up swimming a rapid, but we prefer Keen's Newport's for one reason: the added protection that the toe bumper and beefy sidewalls provide.

Buy Now


If you want the fit of boxer briefs paired with the benefits of performance fabric, the Give-n-Go is your best bet. They’re quick to dry, super breathable, and treated with an antimicrobial that helps cut down on odors.

Buy Now

The Best Gear for Traveling with Kids

The adventure doesn’t stop just because your team has a few new members

Certain sacrifices have to be made when kids enter the picture. It’s a reality that can hit travel life especially hard, as trips we used to plan at the drop of the hat turn into nightmares of diaper bags and foldable strollers. That doesn’t mean you should ditch the family road trip—in fact, there have never been more options to keep our little ones happy on the road or in the big outdoors. For parents keen on starting them young, here are a few of our favorite tools.

Rumpl Jr. Original Puffy Blanket ($65)

(Courtesy Rumpl)

Keep Junior toasty through crisp fall nights with this Rumpl Jr. Original Puffy Blanket. Made with the same insulation as Rumpl’s premium sleeping bags, the mini puffy blanket is light, warm, and easily packable. It’s also machine-washable but will clean just as well with a good shake-and-dust.

BUY NOW

Guava Family Lotus Travel Crib ($209)

(Courtesy Guava)

Nap time is relaxation time, so make sure your little one is well tucked in with the Guava Family Lotus Travel Crib. Small enough to fit in an overhead bin and taking just 15 seconds to assemble, this crib features a side zip that allows you to comfortably place your kiddo inside without dropping him or her from above. Breathable mesh walls allow the crib to double as a playpen at the beach or in high places.

BUY NOW

Mountain Buggy Pod Portable High Chair ($60)

(Courtesy Mountain Buggy)

When it’s time to eat, don’t limit your trip to restaurant high chairs. From campground picnic tables to Airbnb dinner tables, the Mountain Buggy Pod Portable High Chair is one of the most portable and durable eating stations on the market. Featuring strong aluminum clamps to keep your youngster secure, the Pod is lightweight and folds into a tight-enough package to store in the bottom of a stroller or inside a packed trunk.

BUY NOW

Thule Sapling Elite Child Carrier ($320)

(Courtesy Thule)

Built for hiking but equally useful at the grocery store or a summer concert series, the Sapling Elite is designed for Mom and Dad, with adjustable hip and back panels and a mirror for letting you check on your monkey at all times. Maybe the best part of this child carrier is that it’s a legitimate pack, so you can store water, diapers, snacks, and whatever other goodies the trail requires.

BUY NOW

Willie Gear Daddy Diaper Bag ($125)

(Courtesy Willie Gear)

Keep the mess in check with a diaper bag built specifically for the outdoor parent. In addition to the organized interior storage system, Willie Gear’s bag is equipped with a built-in changing mat, giving Mom or Dad an easy, clean work surface, even when you’re out in the wilderness.

BUY NOW

Create Your Own Custom Brooks Running Shoe

>

On Wednesday, Brooks announced that its customizable running shoe will hit shelves in early 2019 with a limited run of 1,914 pairs. (Brooks was founded in 1914.) 

The shoe, called the Genesys, is the result of a partnership between Brooks, HP, and Superfeet. Customization begins with the HP FitStation, which analyzes gait and joint movementsas customers run on a treadmill, captures 3-D foot scans, and measures foot pressure via a sensor-equipped mat. FitStations will be located in select retailers, with sales associates performing the scans and asking customers about their preferences. According to Brooks, “The resulting data will be translated into specific fit and feel requirements,” and the shoes assembled in a new factory in Ferndale, Washington, using an injection-molding process.

The Genesys is reminiscent of another custom running shoe, Salomon’s Mesh, launched in Europe last year. The Mesh also begins with biomechanical analysis, and the data is used to optimize selection from among a fixed set of midsole, outsole, and heel-toe drop specifications. Solomon’s shoes are pricey, ranging from $250 to $327, and currently available only in Europe. (The company is considering bringing them to the U.S. later this year.)

According to Brooks, what sets its program apart is the level of customization. Instead of a shoe pieced together from a limited number of specs, customers receive a midsole and last molded to their unique shape and movement. Zones in the midsole are injected with varying densities of polyurethane based on pressure distribution through the foot and joints. Brooks has yet to release the price of the Genesys but says, “Our goal is to make our personalized footwear as accessible as possible.” To that end, according to the company, the fit process should take only a few minutes. 

We haven’t been able to test a pair yet to determine how much of a difference customization makes compared with Brooks’s off-the-shelf models. In theory, a pair of shoes custom-designed for your foot shape and movement pattern could be a game changer, especially for injury-prone runners faced with limited choices that meet their needs.